Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-25-23 | Santa Clara v. San Diego +7 | 81-63 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Santa Clara is in a letdown spot after a senior night win at home vs Pepperdine last time out and are now vulnerable here in this road game. I know San Diego may not inspire bettors but they have been competitive overall as compared to how the books have lined their games as is evident by covering 8 of their L/11 overall. San Diego to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Oral Roberts v. South Dakota State +4.5 | 69-65 | Win | 100 | 7 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Since the 2005 season, South Dakota State has recorded a 71-40-1 ATS (64%) at home in conference play and must not be underestimated to compete here vs a Oral Roberts. ORAL ROBERTS is 0-8 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons.S DAKOTA ST is 0-8 ATS after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.CBB Home teams as an underdog or pick (S DAKOTA ST) - good shooting team (45-47.5%) against an good defensive team (40-42.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making 47% or better of their shots are 42-16 ATS L/27 seasons for a 73% conversion rate for bettors. Play on South Dakota State to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Arkansas +8.5 v. Alabama | 83-86 | Win | 100 | 6 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. To many points here to lay with Alabama. I know their 14-1 in SEC play and loaded, but with all the crap thats happening around the program right now Im sure this team wont be as focused as they need to be against what is now a fully healthy Razorbacks side. I know Alabama beat up on the Arkansas in their first meeting winning by DDs, but it must be noted that ARKANSAS is 8-0 ATS revenging a loss vs opponent of 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. ARKANSAS is 26-13 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons. ARKANSAS is 16-3 ATS in February games over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (ALABAMA) - off a close win by 3 points or less over a conference rival, with 3+ more starters returning from last year than opponent are 32-66 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 67% conversion rate for bettors. Arkansas to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Maine v. Binghamton -2.5 | 71-67 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Binghamton to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Texas v. Baylor -3.5 | 72-81 | Win | 100 | 5 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Baylor looking to bounce back off two straight losses to Kansas and Kansas state will be primed to play hard here at home in a revenge spot vs Texas who has not played all that well on the road of late losing 3 of their L/4. In the first meeting between these two teams that essentially went down to the wire the Bears were missing some key players, but now their healthy and motivated and ready to lay down the hammer in a building they have accumulated a 13-2 record in this season. TEXAS is 0-8 ATS off 2 straight wins against conference rivals over the last 2 seasons.TEXAS is 4-15 ATS in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. Play on Baylor to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Missouri v. Georgia +3.5 | 85-63 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Georgia after strong season, have lost back to back games by big DD margins, but from a long term trends standpoint it must be noted that sides like the Dawgs that are playing as underdogs at home with an above .500 record and off consecutive losses of 28 or more points are 7-1 ATS dating back 43 seasons. Georgia has covered 5 of their L/6 as home dogs and is also 3-0 ATS hosting as a pup or a chalk of 4 points or less in this series, and also 3-0 SU/ATS as a conference home dog when after suffering a defeat of 30 or more points. Georgia to cover. Meanwhile, Missou off a hard fought 66-64 win vs Miss State last time out. Note: Missouri is 0-6 ATS off a close win by 3 points or less over a conference rival over the last 3 seasons MISSOURI is 3-11 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 3 seasons. GEORGIA is 6-0 ATS in home games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. Play on Georgia to cover |
|||||||
02-24-23 | South Alabama +4.5 v. UL - Lafayette | 64-74 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Lafayette beat S.Alabama 79-76 in their first meeting this season, and now its redemption time for the visitors who are 6-0 ATS (revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. CBB Road teams as an underdog or pick (S ALABAMA) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Friday nights are 35-9 ATS L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. South Alabama to cover |
|||||||
02-24-23 | Fairfield v. Niagara OVER 124.5 | 68-76 | Win | 100 | 14 h 40 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play on the over |
|||||||
02-23-23 | San Diego v. Gonzaga UNDER 165.5 | 72-97 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a combined score of closer to 161 which gives us a two possesion edge on this totals offering. GONZAGA is 8-1 UNDER in home games after 2 straight games where they made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 148.3 ppg scored.GONZAGA is 6-0 UNDER after a road game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 149 ppg scored. Lavin is 17-5 UNDER versus very good shooting teams - making 48% or more of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997 with a combined average of 147.8 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is greater than or equal to 160 (GONZAGA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 84+ points/game on the season, after allowing 85 points or more are 30-5 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 86% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
02-23-23 | Northeastern v. Drexel -5.5 | 48-75 | Win | 100 | 11 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Dragons have won four in a row vs Northeastern, including a 76-55 win in Boston back in January proving to me from a data standpoint that they matchup well in tonights confrontation. I know Drexel has been slumping of late, losing three straight , but that is a good thing as we get to buy low here in this spot play ( Two of the losses came by 1 point and 3 points) The /Dragons can clinch 5th place with a win here in their final regular season game so a top tier effort is to be expected. Huskies are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. Dragons are 3-0-1 ATS in their last 4 home games. Dragons are 5-1-1 ATS in their last 7 home games vs. a team with a losing road record. Dragons are 5-1-1 ATS in their last 7 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of less than .400.Dragons are 22-7 ATS in their last 29 games following a straight up loss. Spiker is 12-3 ATS as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points in all games he has coached since 1997. Coen is 18-31 ATS L/49 versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NORTHEASTERN. CBB Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (DREXEL) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a bad team (20 to 40%) are 75-5 SU L/5 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +10.9 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on Drexel to cover |
|||||||
02-22-23 | Wake Forest +6 v. NC State | 74-90 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. NC Carolina State got by Wake Forest 79-77 in the first closely contested meeting this season and Im betting on another close match here today. The Deacons 3 point shooting is what gives them the capability to be a force here tonight. In. a hard fought loss to top tier Miami Fl last time out Wake Forest showed off their downtown skills and are the only team this season to make more than 12 triples against Miami. note: WAKE FOREST is 7-0 ATS after a game where they made 13 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons. Keatts is 9-19 ATS in home games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of NC STATE. Keatts is 5-14 ATS in home games versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of NC STATE. NC STATE is 2-11 ATS in home games versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. Play on Wake Forest to cover |
|||||||
02-22-23 | South Florida v. UCF -8.5 | 82-75 | Loss | -112 | 12 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UCF has revenge on board for a loss they suffered to South Florida earlier this season and now its redemption time. After two one possession point losses to Memphis and Cincinnati the home side will be well prepared to take on this lesser talented school and hungry as hell to get back into the win column. The Knights are 3-0 SU/ATS L/3 when seeking same season revenge vs USF. Home side is 14-3 ATS in this series. UCF to cover |
|||||||
02-22-23 | Eastern Kentucky v. North Florida +2.5 | 64-77 | Win | 100 | 12 h 8 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This N.Florida is a dangerous and explosive side thats being under rated here at home where they are 9-2 SU this season North Florida ranks 10th in the nation in three-pointers made per game at 10.1 per contest. The Ospreys have poured in double-digit three-pointers in 15 games, including four games of at least 15 treys. Eastern Kentucky Colonels despite of a strong record are 4-8 in road games this season. N FLORIDA is 6-0 ATS in home games after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.N FLORIDA is 9-1 ATS in home games after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals over the last 3 seasons.N FLORIDA is 23-9 ATS L/32 in home games after playing a road game. E KENTUCKY is 5-16 ATS in road games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.E KENTUCKY is 4-12 ATS in road games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.E KENTUCKY is 1-10 ATS in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. CBB Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (E KENTUCKY) - an explosive offensive team (76 or more PPG) against a good offensive team (74-76 PPG), after a combined score of 175 points or more are 6-27 L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate. Play on North Florida to cover |
|||||||
02-21-23 | Indiana v. Michigan State -3 | 65-80 | Win | 100 | 16 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MSU is 20-2 SU L/22 at home in this series, including 4-0 SUATS when seeking same-season revenge from DD defeat. Note: Indiana beat up on the Spartans 82- 69 at home last month. I know Indiana has played well recently, but despite of this have only cashed in only 2 of their L/10 road games. INDIANA is 0-7 ATS in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. Spartans are 6-1 ATS in their last 7 home games. Home team is 26-10 ATS in the last 36 meetings. Play on Michigan State to cover Michigan State to cover |
|||||||
02-21-23 | Kent State v. Ball State +4 | 70-82 | Win | 100 | 12 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Ball State Cardinals are averaging 24.4 free throws per game, which is third in the NCAA and leads the MAC. Ball State is averaging 16.4 free-throws made per contest, which is tied for 19th in the nation and is second in the conference.The Cardinals are also currently shooting 47.3 percent from the field, which is tied for 41st in the NCAA and is second in the MAC. Ball State has been profecient from behind the arc with a 37.6 percent from the land of the trey, which is tied for 27th in the country and third in the MAC. This is the kind of shooting and conversion rates a team needs to compete with a explosive Kent State side. The Cards also have revenge on board for a ugly DD loss at Kent earlier this season, so this side will be extremely motivated to pull off the upset on their own home floor. Underdog is 5-2 ATS in the last 7 meetings.Home team is 4-0 ATS in the last 4 meetings. Play on Ball State to cover |
|||||||
02-21-23 | Bowling Green v. Miami-OH -1.5 | 65-74 | Win | 100 | 11 h 47 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Miami heads into this match against the Falcons with revenge on board for a loss to Bowling Green after falling 73-83 earlier in the year on the road. Home court advantage and being in redemption mode Im betting will propel Miami O to a cover this evening. The RedHawks hold a lifetime 51-18 home record vs Bowling Green who are 4-9 on the road this season.Falcons are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 road games. In a game that the linesmakers consider to be a close one, taking a team like Miami that can convert at the charity stripe is a key. Miami University currently ranks 12th in the nation in free throw shooting percentage. BOWLING GREEN is 0-11 ATS after 2 straight games giving up 9 or less offensive rebounds this season.BOWLING GREEN is 3-15 ATS versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. Play on Miami O |
|||||||
02-20-23 | Cal-Irvine v. Cal Poly +11 | 59-56 | Win | 100 | 13 h 49 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UC Irvine's 78-76 Saturday home victory against UC Davis was a hard fought affair and now against a Cal Poly side on a ugly 15 game losing streak, are being over rated on this line. No doubt in my mind that Cal Irvine is the superior side, but they will Im betting be in a letdown situation against a side they could easily be overlooking. Its of interest to note that in their first meeting this season, the Anteaters barley go by the Mustangs 55-54. Smith is 6-0 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CAL POLY-SLO.CAL POLY-SLO is 6-0 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game this season.CAL POLY-SLO is 10-3 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record this season. Mustangs are 22-7 ATS in their last 29 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. CBB Favorites of 10 or more points (UC-IRVINE) - after a close win by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 65 points or less 3 straight games are 13-45 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Cal Poly to cover |
|||||||
02-20-23 | UC San Diego +8.5 v. UC-Davis | 66-76 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Tritons enter Monday's contest against Cal Davis fresh off a 1-1 week after a closely contested loss to Cal State Fullerton, 76-73 on Wednesday, before defeating CSUN 75-62 on Saturday. Cal Davis is off a hard fought loss to Cal Irvine last time out by just 2 points and could easily find themselves in a letdown spot. Tritons are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 road games.Tritons are 7-1 ATS in their last 8 road games vs. a team with a home winning % of greater than .600. Aggies are 2-7 ATS in their last 9 games following a straight up loss. Aggies are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 home games. Cal San Diego to cover |
|||||||
02-19-23 | Memphis +14 v. Houston | 64-72 | Win | 100 | 7 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Houston smashed Memphis, 71-53, in the finals of the AAC title game last season and now the Tigers have revenge on board . Note: Memphis is 12-3 ATS L/13 vs the Cougars, including 5-0 ATS when seeking revenge. Considering the Cougars current top form having won 8 of their L/9 with the one loss coming by 1 point to Tulane, Im betting they are capable of being very competitive vs their ranked opponent. Hardaway is 15-4 ATS versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MEMPHIS. Play on Memphis to cover |
|||||||
02-19-23 | Ohio State +13 v. Purdue | 55-82 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ohio State had a 69-66 with under a minute to play but Purdue rallied to score the final five points and escape Columbus with a 71-69 in their first meeting this season. Im betting the slumping Buckeyes find a way to stay competetive here as they try to save some face from a disappointing season. Boilermakers are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games vs. a team with a losing straight up record. Road team is 4-0-1 ATS in the last 5 meetings. Underdog is 3-1-1 ATS in the last 5 meetings. Ohio State to cover |
|||||||
02-18-23 | Colorado +13 v. Arizona | 68-78 | Win | 100 | 11 h 40 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Colorado is a side that is not easily intimidated , as was the case when they took out Tennessee on the road earlier this season. Arizona has a game with Arizona state up next, and they could easily find themselves looking ahead to that tilt. It must also be noted Colorado has revenge on board for a loss to the Wildcats in last years PAC 12 tourney. Boyle is 14-3 ATS as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. CBB Home favorites of 10 to 19.5 points (ARIZONA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, top level team, winning 80% or more of their games on the season are 44-79 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 64% conversion rate for bettors. Colorado to cover |
|||||||
02-18-23 | Georgia v. Alabama -18.5 | 59-108 | Win | 100 | 10 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. After losing at Tennessee last time out you can bet this ultra talented Alabama side will be primed to bounce back in a big way this week vs a Georgia side that defeated them in Athens last season as underdogs. So Im betting on bounce back and revenge minded home side to really come out here and lay down an ugly and merciless beatdown. Note: Georgia is 0-4/WU ATS L/4 on the road with the average ppg diff clicking in at -22 . GEORGIA is 1-8 ATS in road games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. Alabama to cover |
|||||||
02-18-23 | Winthrop -140 v. Charleston Southern | 75-67 | Win | 100 | 9 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Winthrop beat Charleston Southern by 74-64 count earlier this season at home and Im betting on a rinse and repeat situation taking pace on the road . CHARLESTON SO is 1-9 ATS in home games revenging a road loss vs opponent over the last 3 seasons. CHARLESTON SO is 2-11 ATS when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons. CHARLESTON SO is 1-11 ATS as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick since 1997. CBB Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (WINTHROP) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or better ) against a poor 3PT defense (>=36.5%), after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 33-5 ATS L/27 seasons for a 87% conversion rate for bettors. Winthrop has won 5 straight meetings in this series. Play on winthrop |
|||||||
02-18-23 | Old Dominion +4 v. Appalachian State | 74-63 | Win | 100 | 8 h 43 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Payback on board for Old Dominion as they are in revenge mode for a loss to App State earlier this season. Old Dominion is also off a loss last time out, and are viable team to back under those circumstances as they are 11-1 ATS L/12 off a SU loss . OLD DOMINION is also 6-0 ATS off a loss against a conference rival this season. These two sides are tied in the Sun Belt standings right now and Im betting on a dog fight with the points proving to be golden. OLD DOMINION is 6-0 ATS in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 18 or less free throws/game this season. Play on Old Dominion to cover |
|||||||
02-18-23 | Queens NC +8.5 v. Kennesaw State | 83-76 | Win | 100 | 5 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Queens enters Saturday afternoon averaging 79.4 points per game on 45 percent shooting from the field and 35 percent from behind the arc. The Royals are the league's leading scoring offense and hold a 1.103 offensive efficiency rating. What I look for in this type of dog , is their ability to be able to back door a side in a losing effort and or being able to comnsistently get to the FT line. Note: The ASUN leads all NCAA Conferences in three-point attempts this season with a combined 9,445 attempts. The Royals are averaging 27.2 three-pointers per game which is the third most in the league. Queens is sinking an average of 9.6 three-pointers per game. Queens has gotten to the free throw line the second most in the ASUN and made the most free throws in the league. The Royals are top 50 in the nation in free throw attempts per game. Queens to cover |
|||||||
02-18-23 | Bucknell v. Boston University -4.5 | 61-77 | Win | 100 | 5 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Boston beat Bucknell 69-61 on the road earlier this season and matchup very well in this spot play at home vs a BUCKNELL side that is 0-8 ATS revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. Boston U to cover |
|||||||
02-17-23 | Utah Tech v. Southern Utah -8 | 71-81 | Win | 100 | 14 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Utah Tech beat Southern Utah 86-79 last month at home, but now revenge is on board here in the rematch on Southern Utahs home court where they almost always play their best hoops garnering a 11-1 record this season with the average ppg diff clicking in at +31.8 ppg. Southern Utah is 5-0 ATS in their last 5 home games. CBB Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (UTAH TECH) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game are 7-33 ATS L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Southern Utah to cover |
|||||||
02-17-23 | Niagara v. Mt. St. Mary's | 66-70 | Win | 100 | 6 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
02-16-23 | Weber State v. CS Sacramento OVER 126 | 52-49 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 18 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. WEBER ST is 44-14 OVER at road when the line is +3 to -3 with a combined average of 144.4 ppg scored. Weber has gone over in 6 straight games. Sacramento state has gone over in 4 of their L/5 overall. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (WEBER ST) - off an upset loss to a conference rival as a favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 33-9 OVER L/5 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
02-16-23 | Ohio State v. Iowa -7 | 75-92 | Win | 100 | 11 h 20 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Iowa is tops in the Big Ten and 22nd nationally in scoring offense (80.6). The Hawkeyes have led the league in scoring five of the last nine seasons, including the last four and here tonight vs a Buckeyes side that has shown itself to be offensively challenged of late scoring 70 or less points in 9 of their L/10 Im betting on Iowa getting a conclusive victory.After starting league play 0-3, Iowa has won eight of its last 11 games since Jan. 5. Hawkeyes are 35-16-3 ATS in their last 54 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of less than .400. Hawkeyes are 45-21-3 ATS in their last 69 home games. Hawkeyes are 38-18-4 ATS in their last 60 home games vs. a team with a losing road record. Buckeyes are 0-6 ATS in their last 6 road games vs. a team with a home winning % of greater than .600. Buckeyes are 0-6 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. Buckeyes are 1-11 ATS L/12 overall. Iowa to cover |
|||||||
02-16-23 | Jacksonville v. Austin Peay OVER 125 | 60-56 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 19 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a total in low 130s giving us a substantial edge on this Totals offering. AUSTIN PEAY is 33-18 OVER L/51 when the total is 120 to 129.5 with a combined average of 135.8 ppg scored. CBB Road teams where the total is 129.5 or less (JACKSONVILLE) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 48-11 OVER L/5 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors. CBB Home teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (AUSTIN PEAY) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 20% to 40% of their games on the season are 43-23 OVER L/5 seasons for a 65% conversion rate. Play on the over |
|||||||
02-16-23 | St Francis PA v. St Francis NY UNDER 136 | 72-64 | Push | 0 | 5 h 42 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
02-15-23 | TCU +4 v. Iowa State | 59-70 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Baylor made five of its last six field goal attempts to facilitate TCU third straight loss * a 72-68 heart breaker) last time out which will make the Frogs all the more hungry this week vs a Iowa State hoops program that has lost 4 of their L/5 overall. TCU has won eight of the last 11 meetings in this series, including four of five in Ames and get the nod again to cover. Last season, TCU won in Ames, 59-44, over the No. 15 Cyclones. Dixon is 8-1 ATS versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of TCU.TCU is 6-0 ATS off a home loss over the last 2 seasons. Play on TCU to cover |
|||||||
02-15-23 | South Florida v. Tulsa +4.5 | 96-69 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Both these sub par sides do not inspire many bettors, but it must be noted that Tulsa is undefeated in the series against South Florida, wining all 12 of the previous matchups, six of which have happened in the Reynolds Center. According to my projections this tilt should be closer to. a pickem, so getting points with the home side in my humble opinion makes for a viable wagering opportunity.Bulls are 2-6 ATS in their last 8 road games vs. a team with a home winning % of less than .400. Play on Tulsa to cover |
|||||||
02-15-23 | St. Joe's +8 v. Duquesne | 62-76 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Saint Joseph's enters Wednesday on a two-game win streak, and have won seven of its last nine and have revenge on board for a loss suffered to Dequesene earlier this season. Hawks are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 road games. Hawks are 8-1 ATS in their last 9 games overall. Hawks are 8-2-1 ATS in their last 11 road games vs. a team with a winning home record. Hawks are 6-2-1 ATS in their last 9 road games vs. a team with a home winning % of greater than .600. Dambrot is 5-14 ATS in home games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DUQUESNE.Dambrot is 10-20 ATS in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of DUQUESNE. DUQUESNE is 4-15 ATS L/19 in home games versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games . Play on St.Joe's to cover |
|||||||
02-14-23 | Buffalo v. Ohio -5 | 61-85 | Win | 100 | 12 h 0 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ohio is coming off a 90-81 win against Akron last Friday and have momentum on their side vs a Buffalo side that beat them earlier this season and the Bobcats now have the added incentive of redemption. Ohio U is 13-2 SU and 14-1 ATS as hosts in MAC games when seeking same-season loss revenge. Ohio is 11-1 in the Convo this season. • Last season Ohio finished 15-2 in the Convo. BUFFALO is 2-9 ATS versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (OHIO U) - an excellent offensive team (76 or more PPG) against a horrible defensive team (76 or better PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more are 25-6 ATS L/5 seasons for a 79% conversion rate. Play on Ohio to cover |
|||||||
02-14-23 | Missouri +6.5 v. Auburn | 56-89 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 47 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Tigers have won five of their last six, including an 86-85 win at No. 6 Tennessee Saturday. Mizzou ranks 13th in the country with a scoring offense of 82.1, while allowing 75.2 points.MU has won its last 22 games when scoring at least 70, including a perfect 18-0 mark this year and with my projections estimating a offensive total of 70 plus I feel confident in a underdog wager backing Mizzou vs Auburn who are off 3 straight losses and fade material in their current form. MISSOURI is 6-0 ATS as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points over the last 3 seasons.MISSOURI is 11-1 ATS after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. CBB team (AUBURN) - off 3 straight losses against conference rivals against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog of 12 points or more are 18-52 L/26 seasons for a go against 74% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Missouri to cover |
|||||||
02-14-23 | Kent State v. Western Michigan +11.5 | 82-58 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Western Michigan suffered a 80-72 loss in Kent back in Jan. Im betting the Broncos bounce back off a ugly effort at NIU last time out in a sleepy DD loss.Im betting ti will be their tenacious rebounding that keeps them competitive in this tilt. The Broncos enter the week atop the MAC in both rebounding margin (+5.6) and offensive rebounding (12.5).WMU is 25th in the nation in rebounding margin and 26th in offensive rebounding. Golden Flashes are 2-5 ATS in their last 7 games vs. a team with a winning % below .400. Golden Flashes are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 road games vs. a team with a losing home record. Broncos are 9-2-1 ATS in their last 12 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (KENT ST) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a top-level team (80% or more ) playing a team with a losing record are 9-36 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Western Michigan to cover |
|||||||
02-14-23 | Georgetown +12 v. Seton Hall | 68-76 | Win | 100 | 11 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. In their last contest earlier this season, the Hoyas lost 66-51 in Washington, D.C. Spears. Im betting they make the needed adjustments to be more competitive today in revenge mode. GEORGETOWN is 7-0 ATS revenging a home loss vs opponent of 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. GEORGETOWN is 7-0 ATS in road games revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons. SETON HALL is 9-22 ATS in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games since 1997.SETON HALL is 2-9 ATS ( in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.SETON HALL is 4-12 ATS in home games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. CBB Underdogs of 10 to 19.5 points (GEORGETOWN) - revenging a home loss vs opponent of 10 points or more, off 3 straight losses against conference rivals are 23-5 ATS this season. Play on Georgetown to cover |
|||||||
02-13-23 | West Virginia v. Baylor -6 | 67-79 | Win | 100 | 13 h 42 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Bears have a quick turnaround, hosting West Virginia for Big Monday just 48 hours after their 72-68 victory over TCU. Then they travel up to Lawrence to play Kansas on Saturday. Some might think this sandwich game, will have them in a letdown spot and looking ahead, but I beg to differ as Im betting at this time of the year, the team will be prepared to play at a high level, no matter the situation at hand. W VIRGINIA is 2-9 ATS versus good rebounding teams - out-rebounding opponents by 4+ per game after 15+games over the last 2 seasons. W VIRGINIA is 2-9 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons/W VIRGINIA is 5-13 ATS as a road underdog or pick over the last 2 seasons. W VIRGINIA is 17-33 ATS revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a home favorite since 1997 BAYLOR is 8-1 ATS vs. teams who are called for 3+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. CBB Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (W VIRGINIA) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game are 7-32 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Baylor to cover |
|||||||
02-13-23 | Hartford v. South Alabama UNDER 134.5 | 53-77 | Win | 100 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
02-13-23 | Morgan State -1 v. South Carolina State | 62-74 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. South Carolina State enters Monday night's coming off a 94-84 win against Coppin State on Saturday afternoon at S-H-M Arena. With the win, the Bulldogs snapped a 7-game losing streak and improve to 4-20 and 1-7 in conference play, but Im betting that short lived win wont carry into this tilt vs Morgan who has won the last six meetings against the Bulldogs since the 2019-20 season.Bulldogs are 2-10 ATS in their last 12 games following a ATS win. Play on Morgan State to cover |
|||||||
02-13-23 | Northeastern +16.5 v. College of Charleston | 63-99 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Coen is 16-7 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NORTHEASTERN. CBB Road underdogs of 10 to 19.5 points (NORTHEASTERN) - revenging a home loss vs opponent of 10 points or more, off 3 straight losses against conference rivals are 122-69 ATS L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate. CBB Home teams as a favorite or pick (COLL OF CHARLESTON) - an explosive offensive team (78 or more PPG) against a poor offensive team (63-67 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more 3 straight games are 9-32 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Northeastern to cover |
|||||||
02-12-23 | Michigan State +3.5 v. Ohio State | 62-41 | Win | 100 | 5 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ohio State has not looked good in Big 1o play going 3-10 SU and 2-11 ATS and here vs a NCAA bubble team Michigan state Im betting things wont get much better as Tom Izzo will have his troops ready to compete as victories are paramount to his programs chances of making 25 consecutive NCAA tourney appearances. OHIO ST is 0-6 ATS versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or better after 15+ games this season.OHIO ST is 1-8 ATS (-7.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing !4 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. OHIO ST is 1-11 ATS after a conference game this season. MICHIGAN ST is 6-0 ATS after scoring 65 points or less 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. CBBH ome teams as a favorite or pick (OHIO ST) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against a good defensive team (63-67 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less are 40-71 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 64% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Michigan State to cover |
|||||||
02-12-23 | Michigan State v. Ohio State OVER 136.5 | 62-41 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 12 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MICHIGAN ST is 9-2 OVER in road games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 148.1 ppg scored. OHIO ST is 12-4 OVER versus teams who average 6 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 142.6 ppg scored. CBB Road teams against the total (MICHIGAN ST) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or more ) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 54-18 OVER l/5 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 149.3 ppg. Play on the OVER |
|||||||
02-12-23 | Temple +9 v. Memphis | 77-86 | Push | 0 | 4 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Temple will be looking to rebound after falling for the first time on the road as favs in conference play against SMU (72-71) Wednesday. The loss snapped a streak of five straight road wins to open league play. Im betting they were in a letdown situation after Houston beat up on them in their previous tilt in a revenge situation for the Cougars. Now I expect they will be in the mood for redemption against a Memphis side my power rankings suggest they matchup well against. In their first meeting this season, the Tigers beat the Owls 61-59 and Im betting on another closely contested affair. Note: McKie is 11-3 ATS revenging a same season loss vs opponent as the coach of TEMPLE. TEMPLE is 8-0 ATS after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. TEMPLE is 11-1 ATS after playing a game as favorite this season. TEMPLE is 15-5 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -0.1. MEMPHIS is 0-6 ATS in home games after scoring 80 points or more 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.MEMPHIS is 1-7 ATS when the total is 140 to 149.5 this season. Play on Temple to cover |
|||||||
02-11-23 | Sam Houston State -1 v. Abilene Christian | 77-62 | Win | 100 | 11 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Sam Houston had a 5 game winning streak end last time out at Texas Arlington, by a 70-58 count and now are in bounce back mode. SAM HOUSTON ST is 9-0 ATS after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. Hooten is 13-4 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15 or more games as the coach of SAM HOUSTON ST. ABILENE CHRISTIAN is 1-7 ATS versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots this season. Play on Sam Houston |
|||||||
02-11-23 | Prairie View A&M v. Southern -5 | 65-79 | Win | 100 | 10 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Woods is 8-0 ATS as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points as the coach of SOUTHERN U. Woods is 15-2 ATS in home games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making 31% or less of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SOUTHERN U. CBB Favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (SOUTHERN U) - good FT shooting team (69-73%) against an average FT shooting team (65-69%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (14.5 or less TO) after 15+ games are 40-12 ATS L/5 seasons for. a 77% conversion rate for bettors. Southern U to cover |
|||||||
02-11-23 | Connecticut v. Creighton UNDER 142.5 | 53-56 | Win | 100 | 5 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UConn defeated Creighton, 69-60, at Gampel Pavilion on Jan. 7 and Im betting on another grinding affair here this Saturday. CREIGHTON is 8-0 UNDER in home games on Saturday games over the last 2 seasons. CREIGHTON is 10-3 UNDER versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game this season. Play UNDER |
|||||||
02-11-23 | James Madison v. Coastal Carolina +6.5 | 73-66 | Loss | -115 | 5 h 47 m | Show | |
02-11-23 | Kansas v. Oklahoma +3.5 | 78-55 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oklahoma has lost 3 straight overall and 5 straight conference games and are in desperation mode . Considering how well they played overall in a close 4 point loss in Lawrence earlier this season I can see them being competitive once again. OKLAHOMA is 10-1 ATS as a home underdog of 6 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons. OKLAHOMA is 6-0 ATS as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons. KANSAS is 6-15 ATS versus good shooting teams - making 45% or more of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 season. Play on Oklahoma to cover |
|||||||
02-10-23 | Robert Morris v. Cleveland State OVER 134.5 | 55-57 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CLEVELAND ST is 24-12 OVER against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 147 ppg scored.CLEVELAND ST is 6-0 OVER in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game this season with a combined average of 152.5 ppg scored. CLEVELAND ST is 12-1 OVER when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average 149.5 ppg scored. Toole is 8-1 OVER off a home loss by 10 points or more as the coach of ROBERT MORRIS with a combined average of 138,8 ppg scored. CBB Home teams against the total (CLEVELAND ST) - an average offensive team (67-74 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 90 points or more are 87-40 OVER L/5 seasons for a 69% conversion rate for bettors. Play on the OVER |
|||||||
02-10-23 | Xavier -6.5 v. Butler | 67-69 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 8 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Xavier has revenge on board for being knocked out in the donkey round of last year’s Big East tourney, by a 89 -82 score and Im betting they come here spitting bullets. BUTLER is 2-11 ATS as an underdog this season. BUTLER is 4-11 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game this season. Play on Xavier to cover |
|||||||
02-10-23 | VMI +10.5 v. East Tennessee State | 65-69 | Win | 100 | 11 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. E TENN ST is 0-8 ATS as a home favorite or pick this season. E TENN ST is 0-8 ATS in a home game where the total is 135 to 139.5 over the last 3 seasons. E TENN ST is 1-8 ATS in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game this season. CBB Favorites of 10 or more points (E TENN ST) - average defensive team (67-74 PPG) against a poor defensive team (74-78 PPG) after 15+ games, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half are just 6-28 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play on VMI to cover |
|||||||
02-09-23 | Arizona v. California +19 | 85-62 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona took out California by 15 points at home last time out, and my projections estimate a similar diff here which gives us an almost 2 full possession value with taking points here. CALIFORNIA is 18-8 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. CALIFORNIA is 22-12 ATS after 2 straight games giving up 9 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. Fox is 18-8 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CALIFORNIA. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (ARIZONA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 6-33 L/5 seasons for a go against 86% conversion rate for bettors. |
|||||||
02-09-23 | UCLA v. Oregon State +15 | 62-47 | Push | 0 | 13 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UCLA is 1-8 ATS in road games after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 3 seasons. UCLA is 3-12 ATS after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half over the last 2 seasons. Cronin is 4-13 ATS in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) after 15 or more games in all games he has coached since 1997. OREGON ST is 9-2 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better ) over the last 2 seasons.OREGON ST is 32-19 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (UCLA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 11-46 ATS L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate. Play on Oregon state to cover |
|||||||
02-09-23 | Middle Tennessee +1.5 v. Western Kentucky | 89-93 | Loss | -115 | 12 h 4 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MTSU has won three straight and seven of the last 11 matchups vs W. Kentucky and Im betting they turn the trick again. MIDDLE TENN ST is 11-3 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. MIDDLE TENN ST is 15-0 ATS after 2 straight games with 12 or less assists over the last 2 seasons.MIDDLE TENN ST is 8-1 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons. Play on Midd Tennessee state to cover |
|||||||
02-08-23 | UCF v. Wichita State -125 | 72-67 | Loss | -125 | 13 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Wichita state is moving up in my power rankings while UCF has moved down after 5 straight losses.Some injury issues have been hampering the Knights. The Knights remain without their starting big man in the middle, Michael Durr, and have been 1-5 in his absence since being diagnosed with a thumb injury after the contest against SMU on Jan. 8. Since then, UCF has allowed an average of 83 points per game, including 76.2 points in regulation. Prior to Durr's injury, the Knights were ranked top 25 in the country in scoring defense, allowing 60.3 points a contest. Both teams are hungry, but Im betting on the home side prevailing. Wichita State is 5-0 SU all time at home vs UCF. UCF is 0-7 ATS in road games versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less after 15+ games over the last 2 seasonsUCF is 1-10 ATS in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. Play on Wichita State to cover |
|||||||
02-08-23 | Creighton v. Seton Hall +4 | 75-62 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Seton Hall is out looking for revenge after an ugly 22 point blowout loss to the Blue Jays on the road earlier this season. Creighton is a fine team, but away from home seem average at best . Note: Since that loss the Pirates have won 7 of their L/8 overall are 8-3 at Prudential Center this season and their average margin of victory in Newark coming by 21.4 points per game. Im betting it will be Seton Halls top tier D, that is the difference maker tonight. Seton Hall has one of the top defenses in the country as it ranks 14th in KenPom's adjusted defensive efficiency and it tops the BIG EAST in scoring defense (64 ppg), field goal percentage defense (40.4 pct) and three-point field goal defense (29.4 pct). Seton Hall has played one of the most difficult schedules in the country as KenPom ranks the Pirates' slate as the 15th toughest in Division I and its NET SOS ranks 21st. Holloway is 20-6 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) in all games he has coached since 1997.Holloway is 39-21 ATS ) as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Seton Hall to cover |
|||||||
02-08-23 | Hofstra v. Northeastern OVER 142 | 72-53 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
02-07-23 | Cincinnati v. Tulane UNDER 153.5 | 94-101 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 44 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a total closer to 148 giving us a full two possession plus advantage to the under on this offering. TULANE is 36-20 UNDER in home games versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game with a combined average of 133.5 ppg in that 56 game sampling size.
CINCINNATI in their L/149 road games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) have seen a combined average of 133.2 ppg scored.
CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (TULANE) - after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more, with all five starters returning from last season are 45-14 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors. CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (CINCINNATI) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread against opponent hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread are 60-31 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 66% conversion rate for bettors. Play under |
|||||||
02-07-23 | Toledo +2.5 v. Akron | 84-74 | Win | 100 | 14 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Toledo has won 10 of its last 13 meetings vs. Akron but dropped a 70-62 decision to the Zips in last year's MAC semifinals and now have some extra motivation with revenge on board . TOLEDO is 8-1 ATS in a road game where the total is 145 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons.TOLEDO is 11-3 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.TOLEDO is 11-3 ATS versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. Toledo to cover |
|||||||
02-07-23 | Rutgers +4.5 v. Indiana | 60-66 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Rutgers and Indiana will meet for the 16th time, with RU leading the series, . RU has ran its winning streak against the Hoosiers to six straight and eight of the past nine game and Im betting on a rinse and repeat situation here this evening. Pikiell is 13-3 ATS as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points in all games he has coached since1997. Its going to be Rutgers extremely strong defense that gets us the cover. Note:Rutgers has been moving upward this season thanks to an outstanding defense. The Scarlet Knights are 16-1 when holding its opponent to 65 or fewer points and 8-0 when doing so in Big Ten games. Rutgers has allowed 65 points or fewer in all but 3 games this year.Scarlet Knights are 9-1 ATS in their last 10 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. Play on Rutgers to cover |
|||||||
02-06-23 | Weber State v. Northern Colorado OVER 141.5 | 54-88 | Win | 100 | 15 h 6 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. WEBER ST is 23-7 OVER L/30 versus sub par defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 48% or worse after 15+ games with a combined average of 152.9 ppg scored. N COLORADO is 8-1 OVER in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 18 or less free throws/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 157.8 ppg scored. N COLORADO is 21-8 OVER l/29 as a home underdog of 6 points or less or pick with a combined average of 150.8 ppg scored. Road teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (WEBER ST) - off a road no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team are 74-25 OVER L/26 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 152.9 ppg. Play over |
|||||||
02-06-23 | Idaho State +3.5 v. Northern Arizona | 75-70 | Win | 100 | 11 h 43 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. After a heart breaking OT loss last time out, Im betting Idaho state will be out looking for quick redemption and who better to get it against other than a N.Arizona program they have defeated in their L/3 visits here. CBB underdog (IDAHO ST) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 consecutive road losses of 5 points or less are 103-59 ATS L/26 seasons for a 64% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Idaho State to cover |
|||||||
02-06-23 | Duke +4 v. Miami-FL | 59-81 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. These teams have a recent history of playing closely contested games. Duke defeated Miami fl 68-66 earlier this season at home, and the three previous meetings have been decided by 4. 2, 2 points and Im betting on another. tight affair , with getting points being golden . It must also be noted that the Canes are off a hard fought win on the road vs Clemson last time out, and getting up and putting out the needed energy here as this game progresses may be a problem.MIAMI is 1-8 ATS in home games off a win against a conference rival over the last 2 seasons. Underdog is 4-0 ATS in the last 4 meetings. CBB Home teams where the opening line is +3 to -3 (MIAMI) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving 2 very good teams - outscoring opponents by 8+ PPG in the 2nd half of the season are 20-34 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 63% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Duke to cover |
|||||||
02-05-23 | Stanford v. Colorado -4.5 | 62-84 | Win | 100 | 10 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Colorado plays their very best hoops at home and are averaging 73.0 points , nearly eight points per game more than on the road (65.3 ppg). The Buffaloes have enjoyed a plus-12.4 scoring margin at home. Colorado is shooting 46.7 percent at home, compared to 40.4 percent in road games. The Buffaloes are holding opponents to 60.6 points on 40.6 percent from the field at home compared to 72.1 points and 45.7 percent in road contests. I know Stanford has won 5 straight, but all good and bad runs must come to end . The Buffaloes have won five straight and 15 of the last 17 over the Cardinal and as hosts here in Boulder have won the last eight. Rinse and repeat. Play on Colorado to win |
|||||||
02-05-23 | Houston -10.5 v. Temple | 81-65 | Win | 100 | 9 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Houston Cougars were home chalk vs Temple in their first meeting this season and lost by a 56-55 effort. It was a sleepy effort for a Cougars team that was considered one of the strongest in the nation. Now in redemption mode Im betting we really see the Cougars bring the heat here today in a what Im betting is a one way contest favoring the Cougars. Houston is 8-0 ATS on the road this season. Note: Temple when they lose SU at home vs a revenging opponent are 0-38-1 ATS. HOUSTON is 9-0 ATS in road games after a game where they made 78% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.HOUSTON in their L/ 58 games as a favorite of 10 or more points over the last 3 seasons have seen a average ppg diff click in at +22.6 ppg. Play on Houston to cover |
|||||||
02-05-23 | California v. Utah OVER 127.5 | 46-61 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. After losing two straight games Im betting Utah will out of frustration play a start to finish game here today and really bring the heat in a more wide open tilt that the pundits might expect. These teams played a very low scoring sleeper the last time they met earlier this season with Utah winning by a 58-43 count. Note: CALIFORNIA is 9-1 OVER in road games revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 3 seasons. with a combined average of 138.8 ppg scored. CALIFORNIA is 9-2 OVER versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 133.3 ppg going on the scoreboard.CALIFORNIA is 7-0 OVER after scoring 65 points or less 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average off 144.2 ppg scored. UTAH is 25-12 OVER L/37 in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games with a combined average of 140.4 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (UTAH) - off an upset loss as a favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 40-10 OVER L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
02-05-23 | DePaul +11 v. Seton Hall | 64-69 | Win | 100 | 2 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. SETON HALL is 1-8 ATS when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons. Stubblefield is 14-2 ATS when playing only their 2nd game in 8 days as the coach of DEPAUL.DEPAUL is 6-0 ATS in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. DePaul to cover |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Gonzaga +3.5 v. St. Mary's | 70-78 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This may not be one of Gonzaga's best teams, but they are still explosive offensively eclipsing the 100 point plateau 6 times this season behind one of College Hoops top players, Drew Timme. They must not be underestimated, vs a strong Saint Marys side, that is coming off a grueling game against USF last time out that seen them win late with a hard to believe shot. This is a huge letdown situation for the Gaels at an inopportune time. Few is 51-37 ATS as an underdog as the coach of GONZAGA with the average ppg diff clicking in at -2.9. Advantage Gonzaga . ST MARYS-CA is 17-35 ATS L/52 when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better ) after 15 or more games. Play on Gonzaga to cover |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Stony Brook +15 v. Hofstra | 58-79 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Hofstra is lazy around the rim and are often outworked which is not a good omen against a side like Stoney Brook who are exact opposite around the basket with the height to get the job done. Im betting on the visitors to smash and grab their way to a cover on a bloated line. Play on Stoney Brook to cover |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Miami-FL v. Clemson -1.5 | 78-74 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Home court advantage will be Im betting the decisive edge between two evenly matched sides.Clemson owns. a perfect 12-0 100% record this season at Littlejohn Coliseum. Meanwhile, Miami is 0-12 SU playing in this venue since becoming an ACC member. CLEMSON is 13-2 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +5.4 ppg.CLEMSON is 12-3 ATS at home when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +3.6 . Clemson to win |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Miami-OH v. Ohio OVER 151.5 | 68-78 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a combined score of 155 points giving us a almost full 2 possession edge on this number. MIAMI OHIO is 9-2 OVER versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 164.9 ppg scored. OHIO U is 7-0 OVER as a home favorite of 6.5 to 12 points over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 160.6 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (MIAMI OHIO) - after a home game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a road favorite are 30-4 OVER L/26 seasons for a 88% conversion rate for bettors. Play on the OVER |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Kansas v. Iowa State +2 | 53-68 | Win | 100 | 4 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Kansas barley got by Iowa State at home in their first meeting this season 62-60 , but will now be hard pressed to get a cover here on the road vs a Iowa State program that is 5-0 ATS L/5 opportunities with same season revenge from a loss of 20 points or less. Also Kansas has played a tiring schedule of late against top tier opposition and now could easily find the grind very rough vs a tenaciously physical Iowa State side that has won the rebound battle in 8 straight tilts. Iowa State is a perfect 12-0 this season at the Hilton Coliseum and Im betting will hit lucky 13 here today vs the visiting Jayahwks. IOWA ST is 13-5 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better) over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +2.3 . Play on Iowa State to cover |
|||||||
02-03-23 | Air Force +11.5 v. Nevada | 52-72 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Nevada because of a perfect 11-0 home record are being over priced here according to my own projections that make this line closer -9 for the home side, thus giving us a full possession advantage taking points. Nevada beat air force by 6 on the road earlier this season, but it must be noted that AIR FORCE is 10-3 ATS revenging a loss vs opponent this season. Scott is 41-24 ATS as a road underdog of 10 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Air Force to cover |
|||||||
02-03-23 | Kent State +2.5 v. Akron | 55-67 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Zips took the 2022 MAC Championship defeating Kent State 75-55 at Rocket Mortgage center. Now its redemption time for Kent State . I know Akron is undefeated at home this season, but Kent State snapped Akron's 30-game home-court winning streak at the JAR and swept the regular season series last season and are capable of pulling an upset tonight. KENT ST is 6-0 ATS as a road underdog of 3 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons.KENT ST is 6-0 ATS versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game this seasonKENT ST is 9-0 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 season. KENT ST is 10-1 ATSversus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.KENT ST is 9-1 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record this season. Play on Kent State to cover |
|||||||
02-02-23 | Lamar v. McNeese State OVER 139 | 70-63 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Mcneese has averaged over 77 points in offensive production at home this season while LaMars D has allowed over 81 ppg in offense while on the road (11 games)/ and their most recent 5 road games have allowed more than that average . Im betting on McNeese eclipsing their season average at home in offense while Lamar doing enough damage offensively to get us over this offered total. MCneese has won the two most recent meetings- Note: LAMAR is 9-1 OVERwhen playing with double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 151.7 ppg going on the board. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (LAMAR/ MCNEESE ST) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (42.5-45%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) are 32-4 OVER with a combined average of 161.3 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
02-02-23 | Lamar v. McNeese State -8 | 70-63 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 38 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MCNeese to cover |
|||||||
02-02-23 | Kennesaw State v. Bellarmine OVER 132.5 | 90-84 | Win | 100 | 12 h 4 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Two different types of hoops systems are employed by these sides. Kenn state is very aggressive and efficient offensively as is evident by eclipsing the 81 plus point offensive plateau in 7 of their L/9 trips to the hardwood. Meanwhile, Bellermaine is a D, first team. However, tonight against a very efficient offense , their slow down tactics could see them have to open up or handily lose. HC Davenport in 6 home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making 37% or better of their attempts as the coach of BELLARMINE has seen a combined average of 138 ppg go on the board. My projections also estimate a combined score of 137 points giving us a full 2 possession edge to the over on the current total offering. KENNESAW ST is 6-0 OVER versus teams who average 6 or less steals/game on the season this season with a combined average of 155.4 ppg scored. KENNESAW ST is 12-1 OVER in February games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 148.8 ppg scored. KENNESAW ST in their L/28 games when the total is 130 to 139.5 over the last 3 seasons have seen a combined average of 139.5 ppg scored. BELLARMINE is 24-12 ATS (+10.8 Units) versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 135.7 ppg scored. CBB Road teams where the total is between 130 and 139.5 points (KENNESAW ST) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a conference rival, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a team with a losing record are 53-19 OVER L/26 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
02-02-23 | Kennesaw State -3 v. Bellarmine | 90-84 | Win | 100 | 10 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. KENNESAW ST is 6-0 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. BELLARMINE is 0-6 ATS in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making 37% or more of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. Kennesaw State to cover |
|||||||
02-02-23 | NC-Greensboro v. Mercer +3.5 | 69-49 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. These two teams met in Greensboro on January 21 where UNCG narrowly edged Mercer in a defensive battle.UNCG and Mercer are the best defensive teams in the conference currently, allowing only 63.5 PPG and 68.3 PPG, respectively. Im betting on another close contested tilt with home court advantage being the difference maker and a prime cover opportunity for the host getting points. Mercer has won 7 of 11 home games vs Greensboro. Jones is 7-20 ATS as a favorite as the coach of UNC-GREENSBORO. CBB Home teams where the line is +3 to -3 (MERCER) - off 2 straight wins against conference rivals against opponent off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 60 points are 26-5 ATS L/5 seasons for a 84% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Mercer to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Georgia v. Auburn OVER 140.5 | 73-94 | Win | 100 | 13 h 44 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My totals projection comes in at 146 giving us a full two possession edge to the over on this totals offering. AUBURN is 8-0 OVER versus good rebounding teams - out-rebounding opponents by 4+ per game after 15+games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 147.9 ppg scored.AUBURN is 20-8 OVER when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 148.9 ppg scored.Pearl is 17-7 OVER in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of AUBURN with a combined average of 151.4 ppg scored. GEORGIA is 14-5 OVER in road games versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or better over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 154.6 ppg going on the board.GEORGIA is 8-1 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 156.5 ppg scored.GEORGIA is 12-4 OVER as a road underdog or pick over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 148.5 ppg going on the scoreboard. CBB Road teams against the total (GEORGIA) - excellent free throw shooting team (73% or better ) against a good free throw shooting team (69-73%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 50-17 OVER L/5 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 149.3 ppg going on the scoreboard. Play over |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Army v. Lehigh -1.5 | 71-69 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Army defeated the Lehigh Mountain Hawks 80-78 in their last meeting on Dec. 30. Lehigh has however claimed the last two meetings inside Stabler Arena, the recent one coming in the Patriot League Quarterfinal where the Mountain Hawks came out on top, 91-77. Im betting on Lehigh getting revenge here tonight and to notch their 10th straight win overall. CBB underdog (ARMY) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games against opponent after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games are 4-26 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 87% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Lehigh to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Tennessee v. Florida +5.5 | 54-67 | Win | 100 | 10 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Florida Gators, despite of a 64-50 loss at fifth-ranked Kansas State in SEC/Big12 competition , have won five of six in league play and deserve respect here at home vs Tennessee.Florida has held 11 of its previous 13 opponents to under 40-percent shooting, including seven of its eight SEC opponents and Im betting it will once again be their defense that keeps them competitive against this top tier Vols program. FLORIDA is 7-0 ATS after scoring 55 points or less over the last 2 seasons. TENNESSEE is 0-6 ATS in road games after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. Play on Florida to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Albany +14 v. UMass Lowell | 50-66 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Albany despite of a sub par record matches up well against Umass -Lowell beating tem January at home by a 89-63 count. I know revenge is now on board for the home side , but it must be noted UMASS-LOWELL is 0-7 ATS revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -6.7. ALBANY is 34-16 ATS in road games against conference opponents.ALBANY is 19-6 ATS in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game. CBB Home teams as a favorite or pick (UMASS-LOWELL) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average offensive team (67-74 PPG), after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less are 8-34 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 81% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Albany to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Fresno State +4.5 v. Wyoming | 62-85 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 23 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Fresno State is second in the MW in scoring defense in conference play (65.22 points allowed per MW game) Im betting it will be the Bulldogs D, that makes life difficult for the Wyoming Cowboys. Also in a game that the linesmkaers have pegged to be closely contested Fresno State top tier charity stripe shooting will give them a needed edge. Bulldogs enter this tilt having made 73.7 percent of its free throws (205-278), which has a chance to track down the school record for single-season free throw percentage (74.2 percent, 484-652, 1991-92). WYOMING is 0-6 ATS versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game this season. Fresno State defeated Wyoming 58-53 in both teams' MW opener back on Dec. 28 at the Save Mart Center- Wyoming's L/11 revenge opportunities have seen an average 1.1 ppg diff. Four of the last five games in the series have been decided by five points or fewer. Play on Fresno State to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Kansas State v. Kansas -6.5 | 78-90 | Win | 100 | 12 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Revenge and redemption on board for Kansas tonight at home after a 83-82 loss on the road earlier this season in these rivals only meeting. The Kansas Jayhawks are 4-0 SU/ATS L/4 opportunities when seeking same-season revenge against the Kansas State, with every victory coming by by double-digit margins.Self is 26-12 ATS revenging a same season loss vs opponent as the coach of KANSAS with the average ppg margin clicking in just around under 10 ppg. Kansas is No. 8 in the NET Rankings through games played on Jan. 29. Kansas is No. 1 in NET Strength of Schedule and its eight Quadrant 1 wins are the most in NCAA Division I. Play on Kansas to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Akron -2 v. Buffalo | 81-64 | Win | 100 | 10 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. AKRON is 8-1 ATS versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. Whitesell is 1-10 ATS in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. Akron to cover |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Alabama State v. Florida A&M UNDER 127 | 58-69 | Push | 0 | 15 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Alabama State has the fourth-best scoring defense in the SWAC, allowing 66.4 PPG. The Rattlers have one of the best defenses in the SWAC, allowing 64.5 PPG (2nd best). CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (ALABAMA STATE/FLORIDA A&M) - in a game involving two poor rebounding teams (-3 to -6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 32-4 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 89% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Jackson State v. Southern -8 | 62-73 | Win | 100 | 14 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Southern matches up very well here at home vs visiting Jackson State. This season Southern is 6-0 vs common opponents winning by an average of 11.7 ppg. My projections are estimating a DD win for the hosts, giving us a viable edge on this line offering. Woods is 12-0 ATS n home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 45% or worse after 15+ games as the coach of SOUTHERN U with the average ppg diff clicking at +19. Woods is 10-0 ATS in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SOUTHERN U which was the case last time out with the average ppg diff clicking in at +17.5/ Woods is 9-1 ATS in a home game where the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of SOUTHERN U with the average ppg diff clicking in at +21.1 . Play on Southern to cover |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Iowa State v. Texas Tech +1.5 | 77-80 | Win | 100 | 14 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Tech's 34-point loss in Ames is its biggest margin of defeat this season and came after the Red Raiders beat ISU by 31 (72-41) in the Big 12 Championship quarterfinals last season. Iowa State got their revenge, but now its payback time for the Raiders in the rematch. Quote:"We've got payback on Monday," Obanor said. "It's the second half of Big 12 and it starts over. It's an 18-round fight and is truly exciting to see what we can do and what we can become. February is when players become players. The season is not over and I'm excited to show the world who we are and what we can become." End Quote. Tech had a 29-game home winning streak end with its first Big 12 home game this season after going 8-0 at home in non-conference play…. Its a prime opportunity to end a 4 game home losing streak here tonight vs a side that has lost 5 of 9 road games this season and in a look ahead situation to playing Kanas in their next tilt. Note: Iowa State is 3-22 SU L/25 away prior to facing Jayhawks. IOWA ST is 20-39 ATS L/59 on the road when the line is +3 to -3 . CBB home team (TEXAS TECH) - good free throw shooting team (69-73%) against an average free throw shooting team (65-69%), after a game where a team made 50% of their 3 point shots or better are 92-54 ATS L/5 seasons for a 63% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Texas Tech to cover |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Detroit v. Youngstown State -8.5 | 63-73 | Win | 100 | 5 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Youngstown State led the nation as the highest team offensive efficiency rating, per teamrankings.com. The Penguins ranked first with 1.145 points per possession. Over the last three games. The offensive efficiency of Youngstown State was 1.150 points per possession and its obvious to me that they matchup very well against a Jesuit group that is 0-6 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -11.2. This is Detroit Mercy's 2nd road game in 3 nights and fatigue could easily set in here this tilt progresses. CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (DETROIT) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 85 points or more are 19-52 L/5 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -11.1 ppg. Play on Youngstown State to cover |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Oakland v. Robert Morris OVER 140 | 63-68 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a combined score of 145 giving us a full 2 plus possession cushion to the over on the offered number. ROBERT MORRIS is 7-0 OVER versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 155 ppg scored. OAKLAND is 32-18 OVER versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 150.8 ppg going on the scoreboard.OAKLAND is 9-1 OVER after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 160.5 ppg scored.Kampe is 21-8 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 144.5 as the coach of OAKLAND. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ROBERT MORRIS) - off a home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season are 93-38 OVER L/26 seasons for a 71% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Michigan State +8 v. Purdue | 61-77 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Michigan State has won nine of its last 12 games and enters the game on Sunday with a 14-7 overall record, including a 6-4 mark in Big Ten play and must not be underestimated in their ability to compete here this afternoon vs streaking Purdue. The Spartans, have played one of the nation's toughest schedules to open the season, having faced the No. 1 toughest slate of opposing offenses in the country, the 19th-toughest slate of opposing defenses and rank No. 3 overall in strength of schedule. They are battle tested and get my backing to cover . MSU is 3rd in the B1G in scoring defense (64.10 ppg), 2nd in FG% defense (41.3%) and 1st in 3-point defense (28.5%).Tom Izzo is 28-22 in his career against Purdue.Spartans are 7-3 ATS in their last 10 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. PURDUE is 4-12 ATS in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. Purdue is 0-6 ATS in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. Boilermakers are 1-6-1 ATS in their last 8 home games. Boilermakers are 1-9-2 ATS in their last 12 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of less than .400. CBB Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (MICHIGAN ST) - revenging a home loss vs opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive close wins by 5 or less over a conference rival are 79-39 ATS L/26 seasons for a 67% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Michigan State to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Utah v. Oregon -4 | 56-68 | Win | 100 | 10 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oregon matches up very well vs Utah and beat them by 10 points on the road a few weeks ago and have are 22-2 SU overall record against Utah under Coach Altman including winning 10 in a row against Utah. I know Oregon despite of alot top tier talent does not always play up to expectations, but are more than capable of a big game here vs the Utes at home. UTAH is 0-6 ATS in road games revenging a home loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.UTAH is also 2-9 ATS versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. CBB road team (UTAH) - revenging a home loss vs opponent of 10 points or more, with 2 more starters returning from last year than opponent are 279-399 L/26 seasons for a go against 59% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Oregon to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Chattanooga +3 v. East Tennessee State | 73-64 | Win | 100 | 8 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. E TENN ST is 0-9 ATS in home lined games this season.E TENN ST is 0-7 ATS as a home favorite or pick this season. E TENN ST is 0-6 ATS in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game this season. UT-CHATTANOOGA is 7-0 ATS after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. Play on Chattanooga to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Northern Colorado +2 v. Northern Arizona | 73-83 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N.Arizona has lost 9 of their L/10 with their lone victory coming by 1 point, and they are a sub 500 side. I know N.Colorado may not inspire bettors either, but according to my power rankings matchup well here overall, and have won 2 of their L/3 games, while showing passing discipline. N COLORADO is 10-0 ATS after a game committing 8 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. .N ARIZONA is 1-9 ATS as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.N ARIZONA is 1-8 ATS in home games when playing against a sub par team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. Play on N.Colorado to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Illinois -1.5 v. Wisconsin | 61-51 | Win | 100 | 6 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Illinois has won five in a row over Wisconsin and Im betting on the 6th in a row comes here today.
Illinois has won its last two road game by an average margin of 22.0 points. Illinois leads all Big Ten teams with 22 road wins in league play over the last four years and are more than capable of turning the trick here again in this key Big 10 showdown. In its five Big Ten wins, Illinois is averaging 75.4 points while holding opponents to 61.0 points. Underwood is 6-0 ATS in road games versus sub par foul drawing teams - attempting 15 or less free throws/game as the coach of ILLINOIS. Play on Illinois to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Alabama v. Oklahoma +6.5 | 69-93 | Win | 100 | 6 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oklahoma has lost 3 straight and have struggled in Big 12 competition against some of the best teams in the nation, while Alabama is streaking the other way winning 9 straight tilts . But from a matchup perspective the Sooners have the capabilities to slow Alabama down and to use the crowed noise to their advantage. The Sooners have nine players on the roster average 10 minutes or more so their depth will help them. Oklahoma is about the same offensively and defensively nationally in efficiency per 100 possessions. I know Sooners dont look remarkable, while the Tide have opened eyes with their fast paced take no prisoners style, but like I said the Sooners can compete. Oklahoma plays at about the same pace as Mississippi state which Alabama barley got by last time out with a late 3 pointer. ALABAMA is 1-9 ATS L/10 after 8 or more consecutive wins since 1997. OKLAHOMA is 9-1 ATS as a home underdog or pick over the last 3 seasons. OKLAHOMA is 13-3 ATS L/16 in home games against SEC opponents. ALABAMA is 4-16 ATS L/20 in road games against Big 12 conference opponents. Oklahoma is 3-0 SU/ATS L/3 at home in this series. Oklahoma to cover |