Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
04-03-23 | San Diego State v. Connecticut -7 | 59-76 | Win | 100 | 27 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UConn does everything better than San Diego State according to my power rating projections. Big East teams are 7-1 ATS in the championship round game. CONNECTICUT is 15-0-1 ATS after a non-conference game this season and are 15-0 SU and 14-0-1 ATS in non conference tilts this season. CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (SAN DIEGO ST) - after 2 straight close wins by 3 points or less against opponent after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more are 7-30 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 81% conversion rate for bettors. UConn to cover |
|||||||
04-01-23 | Miami-FL v. Connecticut UNDER 149.5 | 59-72 | Win | 100 | 25 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Thee teams can light up the board, but in this type of game defense is what will bring home the victory. Im betting on a grueling physical defensive event that will remain on the low side of the total. Under is 6-2 in Hurricanes last 8 vs. a team with a winning straight up record. Under is 6-1 in Huskies last 7 vs. a team with a winning straight up record. CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games this season with a combined average of 133.6 ppg scored. MIAMI is 15-6 UNDER in road games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 140.7 ppg scored. MIAMI is 10-1 UNDER in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 134.9 ppg scored. - Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (MIAMI) - off 2 or more consecutive upset wins as an underdog, top level team, winning 80% or more of their games on the season are 23-6 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 79% conversion rate. Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 5 or 6 days rest are 178-012 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 63% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
04-01-23 | Florida Atlantic v. San Diego State -2.5 | 71-72 | Loss | -110 | 35 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. San Diego State showed me they are a team that deserves a championship appearance after taking out a highly talented Alabama Crimson Tide program in this tournament. The Aztecs determination, and veteran presence along with a top tier defense first posture suits them well against a side like Florida Atlantic. The Aztecs have 16-3 record in non-conference play this season.Aztecs are 6-0 ATS in their last 6 neutral site games. Aztecs are 13-3-2 ATS in their last 18 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. SAN DIEGO ST is 12-0 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. SAN DIEGO ST is 6-0 ATS in road games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better ) after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons. SAN DIEGO ST is 6-0 ATS after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games this season. Dutcher is 18-4 ATS after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN DIEGO ST. Play on San Diego State to cover |
|||||||
03-30-23 | UAB v. North Texas OVER 127.5 | 61-68 | Win | 100 | 14 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Blazers are yet again one of the highest scoring teams in the country under Andy Kennedy and have successfully in their two most recent meetings this season been able to force N.Texas into opening up as is evident by a 76-69 Neutral court win last time they met in the Conference play offs, and their last regular season game that saw N.Texas procure a 82-79 victory. Both these teams are solid at the charity stripe, which is key to this over bet. UAB is 9-1 OVER versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game this season. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is 129.5 or less (N.TEXAS/UAB) - in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game).are 44-14 OVER L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors. Play OVER |
|||||||
03-28-23 | Wisconsin v. North Texas OVER 115 | 54-56 | Loss | -110 | 83 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Neutral court teams against the total (North TEXAS /WISCONSIN) - in a game involving two below average offensive teams (63-67 PPG) are 36-18 OVER L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate with the average combined score of 131.4 ppg going on the board. Play over |
|||||||
03-26-23 | Miami-FL +4.5 v. Texas | 88-81 | Win | 100 | 34 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Miami plays an explosive form of small ball , behind top tier guards , including a small ball super star in Norchad Omier and despite of the Longhorns current run are in danger of being upset. Note: In the elite 8 round Big 12 teams are 4-15 vs opp off ATS win. Longhorns are 3-11-1 ATS in their last 15 NCAA Tournament games. MIAMI in 23 games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons the Canes have a scoring edge on their favored opponent's by an average of 2.2 ppg. . Hurricanes are 6-1 ATS in their last 7 NCAA Tournament games.Hurricanes are 9-3 ATS in their last 12 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. Miami Fl to cover |
|||||||
03-25-23 | Connecticut -2 v. Gonzaga | 82-54 | Win | 100 | 14 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UConn behind a potent two way game have the edge here vs a strong offensive side with a average at best D. The Huskies are 14-0 SU and 13-0-1 ATS vs non conference opposition this season and Im betting nothing changes here today. GONZAGA is 2-8 ATS in road games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) this season. GONZAGA is 0-6 ATS in a neutral court game where the total is 150 to 154.5 over the last 2 seasons. CONNECTICUT is 7-1 ATS in all neutral court games this season. NBA favorite (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games against opponent after beating the spread by 54 or more points total in their last ten games are 53-21 ATS L/26 seasons for a 71% conversion rate for bettors. NBA underdog (GONZAGA) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games against opponent after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games are 28-7 ATS L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play on UConn to cover |
|||||||
03-24-23 | Princeton +10 v. Creighton | 75-86 | Loss | -110 | 53 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. PRINCETON is 8-1 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. PRINCETON is 6-0 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts this season.PRINCETON is 7-1 ATS as an underdog this season. McDermott is 27-40 ATS \in road games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CREIGHTON. Princeton to cover |
|||||||
03-24-23 | Miami-FL +7.5 v. Houston | 89-75 | Win | 100 | 51 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Miami plays an explosive form of small ball , behind top tier guards , including a small ball super star in Norchad Omier. I know Houston is a strong side, but have failed to cover 7 of 8 vs elite opp with a .750 win % or better like the Canes. Advantage Miami. MIAMI in 23 games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons with both themselves and their opponents scoring an average of 72.2 ppg. MIAMI is 8-1 ATS (versus very good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 39%or less over the last 3 seasons. MIAMI is 11-3 ATS vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 12+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. Play on Miami Fl to cover |
|||||||
03-24-23 | San Diego State v. Alabama -7.5 | 71-64 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Alabama HC Oats is 12-1 ATS as a neutral court favorite of 6.5 to 12 points in all games he has coached since 1997. ALABAMA is 8-0 ATS versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game this season. Alabama to cover |
|||||||
03-23-23 | Gonzaga +2 v. UCLA | 79-76 | Win | 100 | 39 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Gonzaga started fairly slow this season, but kept picking up their pace behind an explosive offense and are now on a 11 game win streak. Meanwhile, UCLA after a top tier season, have had a few issues of late that Im betting hamper them in this battle. Those problems stem from their top defender bering absent (Jaylen Clark) injury and , David Singleton who is limping around after the Bruins win vs Northwestern in the 2nd round of this season tournament. UCLA is 2-10 ATS in the "sweet 16" round of the NCAA tournament since 1997. UCLA is 0-7 ATS in road games versus very good shooting teams - making 48% or better of their shots over the last 2 seasons.UCLA is 0-6 ATS in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 84+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. |
|||||||
03-23-23 | Arkansas v. Connecticut -3.5 | 65-88 | Win | 100 | 37 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arkansas pulled the upset vs Kansas last time out in a grueling physical game and Im betting the Hawgs wont have the needed energy to knock off a UConn side with a 13-0 SU/12-0-1 ATS record vs non conference foes this season. Note:Sweet 16 teams off an upset win over a No. 1 seed are just 4-7 SU and 3-7-1 ATS L/11 opportunities dating back 27 seasons. CONNECTICUT is 14-6 ATS versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots this season with the average ppg diff clicking in at +9.2 .CONNECTICUT is 13-3 ATS after a win by 15 points or more this season. UConn to cover |
|||||||
03-23-23 | Michigan State v. Kansas State OVER 137 | 93-98 | Win | 100 | 10 h 23 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate both sides to eclipse the 70 point plateau giving us value with an over wager in todays NCAA matchup between Michigan State and Kansas State. MICHIGAN ST is 11-3 OVER after a game where they made 78% of their free throws or better this season with a combined average of 1461. ppg scored. KANSAS ST is 6-0 OVER in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 149.1 ppg scored. KANSAS ST is 8-1 OVER in road games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 148.3 ppg scored. KANSAS ST in their L/31 games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons have seen a combined average score of 147.6 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
03-22-23 | UAB v. Vanderbilt | 67-59 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Vanderbilt now on a 12-2 run since January owns a top-25 unit in Adjusted Offensive Efficiency and deserve respect against a UAB side that is considered to by offensively dynamic. Here against a Blazers team that allows alot of downtown action from beyond the arc, Im betting the Dores have the edge. Stackhouse is 31-19 ATS (versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of VANDERBILT. The Commodores are 4-1 in the all-time series versus UAB. The Commodores have won 14 home games, their most since the 2014-15 season. Play on Vanderbilt to cover |
|||||||
03-21-23 | North Texas v. Oklahoma State OVER 124 | 65-59 | Push | 0 | 12 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections mkae this total closer to 128 giving us value with on over wager. CBB teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (N.Texas OKLAHOMA ST) - in a game involving two excellent defensive teams (40% or better), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) are 30-6 OVER L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at 136.9 ppg. Play over |
|||||||
03-20-23 | Wisc-Milwaukee +6 v. Charlotte | 65-76 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Sanchez is 2-11 ATS in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHARLOTTE Wisconsin Milwaukee to cover |
|||||||
03-19-23 | TCU v. Gonzaga UNDER 156.5 | 81-84 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 20 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. TCU will not run and gun here today with a superior offense, and instead will be primed to turn this into a grinding physical affair . The Horn Frogs have slowed some of the most explosive offenses in the nation that come from the Big 12. TCU has allowed an average of 68 ppg this season. GONZAGA is 7-1 UNDER when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) after 15 or more games this season . GONZAGA is 6-0 UNDER in road games after scoring 75 points or more 5 straight games this season. TCU is 8-2 UNDER versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games this season. TCU is 10-1 UNDER in March games over the last 2 seasons. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (GONZAGA/TCU) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (42.5-45%) after 15+ games are 38-8 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
03-19-23 | Miami-FL +2 v. Indiana | 85-69 | Win | 100 | 21 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Absolutely respect the top guard play of this Miami Fl team. Watching them at the end of the last game vs Drake has me very much riding that momentum in this game .With that said, Im backing the Canes to cover vs what can sometimes be a very inconsistent Hoosiers side. . MIAMI is 11-3 ATS in road games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. MIAMI is 20-8 ATS when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 2 seasons. Hurricanes are 4-1 ATS in their last 5 NCAA Tournament games. Hurricanes are 7-3 ATS in their last 10 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record.Hurricanes are 35-16-1 ATS in their last 52 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. Play on Miami FL to cover |
|||||||
03-19-23 | St. Mary's v. Connecticut -3.5 | 55-70 | Win | 100 | 18 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Huskies are 12-0 SU and 11-0-1 ATS in their last eleven non-conference games. Rinse and repeat on what could surprisingly be a mismatch. ST MARYS-CA is 0-8 ATS in road games versus good passing teams, averaging 16 or more assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. Play on UConn to cover |
|||||||
03-19-23 | Pittsburgh +5.5 v. Xavier | 73-84 | Loss | -115 | 12 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Pittsburgh's been on my radar since early on this season and will not be surprised if they upset Xavier straight up. Since. we are getting points that makes for ultimate value with the underdog on this line offering. Capel III is 8-0 ATS after a game - where they allowed a shooting pct. of 28% or less in all games he has coached since 1997. PITTSBURGH is 7-1 ATS versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game this season. PITTSBURGH is 13-4 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game this season. PITTSBURGH is 20-6 ATS versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game this season. Pittsburgh to cover |
|||||||
03-18-23 | Penn State +5.5 v. Texas | 66-71 | Win | 100 | 12 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Penn State has won nine of its last 11 games and earned a 76-59 win over No. 7 seed Texas A&M in Thursday's first round game and deserve respect here as underdogs despite of how formidable their opponent Texas is. Nittany Lions are 21-8-1 ATS in their last 30 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. TEXAS is 0-6 ATS after scoring 75 points or more 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. TEXAS is 1-9 ATS in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. PENN ST is 8-0 ATS in all tournament games this season.. PENN ST is 7-1 ATS in road games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) after 15 or more games this season. PENN ST is 11-1 ATS versus good passing teams, averaging 16 or more assists/game over the last 2 seasons.PENN ST is 9-1 ATS as a neutral court underdog or pick over the last 2 seasons.Shrewsberry is 13-1 ATS in all neutral court lined games as the coach of PENN ST. Play on Penn State to cover |
|||||||
03-18-23 | Auburn +5.5 v. Houston | 64-81 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Auburn is the winningest program, by wins and percentage, over the last six years in the SEC with an impressive 75-15 overall record (.833) versus non-conference opponents. Auburn to cover |
|||||||
03-18-23 | Arkansas +3.5 v. Kansas | 72-71 | Win | 100 | 9 h 6 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arkansas head coach Eric Musselman is 15-1 SU and 14-1-1 ATS as HC in NCAA hoops vs .800 to .875 or better opposition when his team is coming off a win of 5 or more points. Arkansas took out Illinois by DD in round 1 of this tournament and according to my projections are formidable opponents for the Jayhawks here today. ARKANSAS is 28-16 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons. KANSAS is 0-6 ATS after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games this season. Arkansas to cover |
|||||||
03-18-23 | Furman +5.5 v. San Diego State | 52-75 | Loss | -105 | 4 h 42 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Furman has momentum after upsetting Virginia in the opening round of the tournament, and according to my projections matchup well vs San Diego State. Paladins are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. Paladins are 10-1 ATS in their last 11 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. FURMAN is 10-2 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games this season.FURMAN is 9-1 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games this season. Furman to cover |
|||||||
03-18-23 | USC Upstate v. Indiana State UNDER 158 | 62-67 | Win | 100 | 3 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. USC UPSTATE is 7-1 UNDER in road games after 3 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers this season with a combined average of 134 ppg going on the board. Dickerson is 6-0 UNDER after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls as the coach of USC UPSTATE with a combined average of 128,5 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (USC UPSATE/INDIANA ST) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (42.5-45%) after 15+ games are 36-8 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
03-17-23 | Drake +2.5 v. Miami-FL | 56-63 | Loss | -110 | 59 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Drake to cover |
|||||||
03-17-23 | NC State +5.5 v. Creighton | 63-72 | Loss | -110 | 55 h 23 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. NC State to cover |
|||||||
03-17-23 | Vermont +11 v. Marquette | 61-78 | Loss | -110 | 95 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Vermont to cover |
|||||||
03-17-23 | VCU v. St. Mary's -4 | 51-63 | Win | 100 | 52 h 7 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Saint Mary's to cover |
|||||||
03-17-23 | UC-Santa Barbara +11 v. Baylor | 56-74 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Pasternack is 17-4 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of UC-SANTA BARBARA. UC-SANTA BARBARA is 11-1 ATS in a neutral court game where the total is 140 to 149.5 since 1997. UC Santa Barbara to cover |
|||||||
03-17-23 | Kennesaw State v. Xavier UNDER 152 | 67-72 | Win | 100 | 93 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play UNDER |
|||||||
03-16-23 | Colgate +13.5 v. Texas | 61-81 | Loss | -110 | 34 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Colgate enters this tourney game on a 20-1 SU run and deserve respect against a highly ranked Longhorns program that has a history of sub par tourney appearances going just 3-9 SU and 1-11 ATS L/12 . COLGATE is 7-0 ATS in March games over the last 2 seasons. Colgate to cover |
|||||||
03-16-23 | Oral Roberts v. Duke UNDER 146.5 | 51-74 | Win | 100 | 82 h 37 m | Show | |
Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ORAL ROBERTS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after game - allowing a shooting pct. of 33% or less are 35-8 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate. |
|||||||
03-16-23 | Oral Roberts +6.5 v. Duke | 51-74 | Loss | -110 | 34 h 4 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. ACC tourney champions in the NCAA Tournament, 0-7 ATS as a No. 3 or worse seed. Oral Roberts to cover |
|||||||
03-16-23 | College of Charleston +5.5 v. San Diego State | 57-63 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MWC is 1-8 SU and 0-8-1 ATS in first round games since 2010. Charleston to cover |
|||||||
03-16-23 | Howard +22 v. Kansas | 68-96 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. HOWARD is 7-0 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) this season. Howard to cover |
|||||||
03-16-23 | Utah State v. Missouri +1.5 | 65-76 | Win | 100 | 6 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Missouri has wins against Illinois and Kentucky this season, and are more than capable of upending Utah State in this tilt. Mountain West Conference Mountain hoops programs 10th or worse seeds have lost 20 straight times in this NCAA tournament. Play on Missouri to cover |
|||||||
03-16-23 | Furman +5.5 v. Virginia | 68-67 | Win | 100 | 28 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Furnan to cover |
|||||||
03-15-23 | Alcorn State +17.5 v. North Texas | 53-69 | Win | 100 | 13 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this line closer to -13 giving us a more than 2 possession value with the underdog. Bussie is 32-18 ATS in road games as the coach of ALCORN ST. Bussie is 27-14 ATS as a road underdog or pick as the coach of ALCORN ST. Bussie is 9-2 ATS when the total is 129.5 or less as the coach of ALCORN ST. Alcorn State to cover |
|||||||
03-15-23 | Texas Southern v. Fairleigh Dickinson +2.5 | 61-84 | Win | 100 | 9 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Surprise , surprise look who made it into NCAA play in game. FDU behind a high-powered offense that led the conference in points, assists and threes per game will be primed to compete here, after a miraculous come back from last seasons 4-22 debacle. Jones is 7-19 ATS vs. teams who are called for 3+ more fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of TEXAS SOUTHER TEXAS SOUTHERN is 4-11 ATS as a favorite this season. FARLEIGH DICKINSON is 10-1 ATS L/11 versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making 31% or less of their attempts after 15+ games . Fairleigh Dickson to cover |
|||||||
03-14-23 | Seton Hall +4.5 v. Colorado | 64-65 | Win | 100 | 14 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Holloway is 12-2 ATS as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points in all games he has coached since 1997. Seton Hall to cover |
|||||||
03-14-23 | Mississippi State v. Pittsburgh +2 | 59-60 | Win | 100 | 39 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Miss state enters this game having lost 4 straight games and are fade material in their current form against a hard working Pittsburgh side with top tier team chemistry. Play on Pittsburgh to cover |
|||||||
03-12-23 | Penn State v. Purdue OVER 134 | 65-67 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Purdue has defeated the Nittany Lions twice this year (76-63 at The Palestra on Jan. 8; 80-60 in Mackey Arena on Feb. 1). Im betting on a output somewhere in the same range which gives us an edge with a over bet.Painter is 15-3 OVER in a neutral court game where the total is 135 to 139.5 as the coach of PURDUE.Shrewsberry in his L/23 games versus excellent teams - shooting 45% or better with a defense of 42% or better as the coach of PENN ST has seen a combined average score of 139.7 ppg scored. Play on the over |
|||||||
03-12-23 | Princeton v. Yale -3 | 74-65 | Loss | -110 | 2 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ivy League Tournament - Championship - Jadwin Gymnasium - Princeton, NJ Yale, the league's top defensive team, is set to meet Princeton in Sunday's championship game. Defense wins championships and nothing changes today. Yale won both games against Princeton this season and matchup well here once again.YALE is 8-0 ATS when playing their 2nd road game in 3 days over the last 2 seasons.YALE is 9-1 ATS in road games when playing with one or less days rest over the last 2 seasons. Play on Yale to cover |
|||||||
03-11-23 | Arizona +1.5 v. UCLA | 61-59 | Win | 100 | 14 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. These teams split the season series with each winning on their own home court. UCLA took the final meeting. Note: ARIZONA is 6-0 ATS revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons. Arizona beat the Bruins 84-76 last year for the title and a rinse and repeat scenario Im betting is now on board. UCLA has been forced to adjust in the Pac-12 Tournament without wing Jaylen Clark, the Pac-12’s Defensive Player of the Year and he will be missed in this big game. UCLA is 0-6 ATS in road games versus very good shooting teams - making 48% or better of their shots over the last 2 seasons. Play on Arizona to cover |
|||||||
03-11-23 | Utah State +2 v. San Diego State | 57-62 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Utah state rolls into this tilt having won 7 straight all by DD deficits, and are well prepared to take down the San Diego state Aztecs in the MWC championship game . No. 2's seeds in this tourney like the Aggies are 11-3 SU and 10-3-1 ATS L/14 opportunities in MWC title tilts. UTAH ST is 8-1 ATS after 4 straight wins by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. UTAH ST is 6-0 ATS in road games in March games over the last 2 seasons. Odom is 12-2 ATS in all neutral court games as the coach of UTAH ST. Play on Utah State to cover |
|||||||
03-11-23 | Cornell +6.5 v. Yale | 60-80 | Loss | -110 | 2 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ivy League's most explosive offense owned by Yale will meet the most stifling defense (Cornell), and the rubber game will move the winner one step closer to the NCAA Tournament. In post season games like this D, top tier Ds, almost always have an edge. Cornell to cover |
|||||||
03-10-23 | Iowa State +4.5 v. Kansas | 58-71 | Loss | -105 | 14 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Iowa State held all but one (Texas Tech-Overtime) Big 12 opponent below its season scoring average. That total includes holding No. 8 Kansas to 53 points, the lowest conference total under Bill Self. The Cyclones are holding their opponents to a league-best 62.5 points per game this season and deserve respect here in the underdog role. Iowa State os 16-1-1 ATS L/18 post season games. Iowa State to cover |
|||||||
03-10-23 | Temple +5.5 v. Cincinnati | 54-84 | Loss | -115 | 10 h 20 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The teams split the season series with each winning on their own court. The Owls defeated the Bearcats, 70-61, on New Year's Day at the Liacouras Center with Cincinnati defeating Temple, 88-83 in overtime, on Feb. 22 at Fifth Third Arena. TEMPLE in 13 games as an underdog this season have seen a 1 ppg diff. . TEMPLE is 6-0 ATS after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. TEMPLE is 9-1 ATS revenging a road loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons. Miller is 0-6 ATS in road games off a win by 10 points or more over a conference rival as the coach of CINCINNATI. Miller is 0-6 ATS in road games off a win by 10 points or more over a conference rival as the coach of CINCINNATI. Temple to cover |
|||||||
03-10-23 | Mississippi State +7.5 v. Alabama | 49-72 | Loss | -100 | 8 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Bulldogs have plenty of experience against this top ranked Crimson Tide squad after the two teams squared off twice already this season in close matchups and Im betting this one will close as well. MSU has proven that it can matchup well against any hoops program in this country, making nearly every matchup a competitive game which includes wins vs top-25 opponents such as TCU and Texas A&M over the past few weeks. Jans is 9-0 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.Jans is 20-2 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. ALABAMA is 4-15 ATS versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game after 15+games over the last 3 seasons. Play on Mississippi State to cover |
|||||||
03-09-23 | TCU v. Kansas State +2.5 | 80-67 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This will be the sixth meeting (2015, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021) with TCU at the Big 12 Championship, including the fifth in the last 6 seasons, with K-State winning each of the last 4 such meetings. Rinse and repeat on board here. Ive been saying this is a special version of this hoops program and Im betting they leave everything on the floor tonight. Note: KState was a perfect 5-0 SU this season against .833 or better opposition. KANSAS ST is 6-0 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) after 15 or more games this season.KANSAS ST is 7-0 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) this season. CBB Neutral court teams (KANSAS ST) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG), after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more are 35-7 ATS L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play on K State to cover |
|||||||
03-09-23 | Western Kentucky +11 v. Florida Atlantic | 51-75 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. When these teams played last , Hilltoppers battled for a full 40 minutes, but an uneven 3-point shooting night caused the Hilltoppers to fall 70-63 to No. 21 Florida Atlantic. Im betting they find a way to stay close here again today. WKU has advanced to the semi-finals of its conference championship in 14 of the last 17 seasons. Western Kentucky is 17-1 ATS as an underdog in postseason play. Play on Western Kentucky to cover |
|||||||
03-09-23 | Iowa State +4.5 v. Baylor | 78-72 | Win | 100 | 4 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Entering this tourney Iowa State just came off beating up on their first round opponents Baylor in their final regular season game . It was a complete no show for the Bears, and Im once again betting they matchup well against them. From a historical standpoint the Cyclones have covered 6 straight meetings vs Baylor and are 15-1-1 ATS L/17 in this the Big 12 Tournament, Baylor is 0-6 L/6 ATS in the Big 12 Tournament going back 3 seasons. I know Iowa State has been very inconsistent in Big 12 play, but they always seem to bring their A game to tilts facing top tier opponents as is evident by wins vs TCU, Kansas, Kansas State and of course Baylor. Im betting on another big effort here from the underdogs in this tilt. Play on Iowa State to cover |
|||||||
03-09-23 | Miami-OH +13.5 v. Toledo | 75-91 | Loss | -105 | 2 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Miami University currently ranks 10th in the nation in free throw shooting percentage which is important in what Im betting will be a very physical tourney game. Im not saying the Redhawks will win this game, but a cover is a viable wagering opportunity. Toledo is 0-9 ATS L/9 in MAC Tourney and 0-6 ATS as the No.1 seed. Play on Miami O to cover |
|||||||
03-08-23 | South Carolina State +8 v. Howard | 55-91 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The last time these teams played S Carolina St lost a 82-78 loss at home to Howard and here in a neutral court environment Im expecting another affair that favors the underdog getting points. Howard should once again squeeze past S Carolina St , but while looking at some previous matchup stats they are favored by to many points in a tourney game. S CAROLINA ST is 10-0 ATS L/10 versus good 3 point shooting teams - making 37% or better of their attempts after 15+ games. S CAROLINA ST is 17-4 ATS L/21 revenging a home loss vs opponent. S CAROLINA ST is 20-8 ATS L/28 as a neutral court underdog or pick HOWARD is 4-12 ATS when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons.HOWARD is 0-9 ATS in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.HOWARD is 4-12 ATS in road games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. Play on South Carolina State to cover |
|||||||
03-08-23 | Colorado v. Washington +4 | 74-68 | Loss | -116 | 8 h 56 m | Show | |
Pac Twelve Tournament - First Round - T-Mobile Arena - Paradise, NV Washington swept the season series against Colorado . The Huskies have now won three consecutive games in the series and nine of the last 12 and once again look like a viable opponent for the Buffaloes in the first round of the PAC 12 tourney.Washington is tied for the Pac-12 lead and ranks 10th in the NCAA in blocks per game (5.3). The Huskies also have the second-best success at the free throw line of any team in the conference. Their three-point defense ranks atop the league leaderboard and is 16th nationally and matchup well here. COLORADO is 1-8 ATS versus poor passing teams, averaging 12 or less assists/game this season. WASHINGTON is 6-0 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons.WASHINGTON is 22-8 ATS versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.WASHINGTON is 8-0 ATS in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. Play on Washington to cover |
|||||||
03-08-23 | Fresno State v. Colorado State -135 | 65-67 | Win | 100 | 9 h 40 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Mountain West Tournament - First Round - Thomas & Mack Center - Paradise, N Colorado State closed out its regular season schedule with a 92-84 win over New Mexico on Senior Night and now with momentum on their sides look like viable bets here to advance in the MWC tourney vs Fresno State. COLORADO ST is 6-0 straight up/ATS against FRESNO ST over the last 3 seasons including a 70-67 win at Fresno State a few weeks ago. FRESNO ST is 4-16 ATS L/20 in a neutral court game where the total is 130 to 139.5 . Play on Colorado State to win |
|||||||
03-07-23 | Georgia Tech -110 v. Florida State | 61-60 | Win | 100 | 6 h 18 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. ACC Tournament - First Round - Greensboro Coliseum - Greensboro, NC Georgia Tech is riding the second-longest winning streak in the ACC, winning their last three games and obviously enter this ACC Tournament game against Florida State with momentum and from a bettors perspective have cashed 8 straight times . GEORGIA TECH is 7-1 ATS after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season. GEORGIA TECH is 17-4 ATSL/21 after 3 straight games committing 11 or less turnovers . I know Florida State won the first meeting between these teams, but since that game both went in different directions. With revenge as an added incentive Im betting on the Yellowjackets to advance in this tourney. Note: Tech’s offensive efficiency rating is 104.3, they're highest for in seven seasons under HC Josh Pastner. Tech’s season turnover rate of 10.8 per game is its lowest on record dating back to the 1992-93 season when turnovers became an official NCAA statistic. The Jackets have turned it over just 9.5 times per game in its last eight ACC tilts and deserve respect here in this spot play vs a Seminoles side that has lost 6 of their L/7 with the lone win coming a miraculous buzzer beater vs Miami Fl. FLORIDA ST is 0-6 ATS in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. FLORIDA ST is 0-6 ATS in a neutral court game where the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 3 seasons . Georgia Tech to win |
|||||||
03-06-23 | San Francisco v. Gonzaga UNDER 160.5 | 73-84 | Win | 100 | 27 h 30 m | Show | |
West Coast Tournament - Semifinals - Orleans Arena - Paradise, NV My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. SAN FRANCISCO is 6-0 UNDER after scoring 80 points or more 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. SAN FRANCISCO is 10-2 UNDER in all tournament games over the last 3 seasons. GONZAGA is 12-4 UNDER after 7 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. Neutral court teams where the total is between 150 and 160 points (GONZAGA /SAN FRANCISCO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (42.5-45%) after 15+ games are 28-4 L/5 seasons for a 88% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
03-06-23 | San Francisco +14.5 v. Gonzaga | 73-84 | Win | 100 | 15 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Few is 9-19 ATS as a neutral court favorite of 12.5 to 18 points as the coach of GONZAGA. SAN FRANCISCO is 13-3 ATS in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games . CBB Neutral court teams (SAN FRANCISCO) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG), after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more are 32-7 ATS L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate. CBB Favorites of 10 or more points (GONZAGA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team ( 80% or more ) playing a good team (60% to 80%) are 27-62 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 69% conversion rate. Play on SF Dons to cover |
|||||||
03-06-23 | CS Sacramento v. Weber State -2 | 64-70 | Win | 100 | 13 h 28 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Big Sky Tournament - Quarterfinals - Idaho Central Arena - Boise, ID WEBER ST is 10-2 ATS in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. CBB Neutral court teams (WEBER ST) - after going over the total by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, in March games are 69-32 ATS L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate. WEBER ST is 6-0 straight up against SACRAMENTO ST over the last 3 seasons. Weber State to cover |
|||||||
03-05-23 | Northwestern v. Rutgers OVER 126.5 | 65-53 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this total closer to 131 which gives us a full two plus possession value on this totals offering. NORTHWESTERN in their L/34 games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons have seen a combined average of 137.1 ppg scored. Pikiell L/34 versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game as the coach of RUTGERS have seen a combined average of 129.5 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (RUTGERS /NORTHWESTERN) - off an upset loss to a conference rival as a favorite against opponent off an upset loss as a favorite are 49-16 OVER L/5 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors. Play OVER |
|||||||
03-05-23 | Temple +5.5 v. Tulane | 82-83 | Win | 100 | 7 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Owls (16-14, 10-7 AAC) and Green Wave (17-10, 10-6 AAC) will be in a winner take all battle for the third seed in the American Athletic Conference Championship that begins next week at Dickies Arena in Fort Worth, Texas. Im betting this tilt will be closely contested. Temple also have revenge on board for a loss to Tulane earlier this season.Temple is 7-3 SU overall in games at Tulane and had won seven straight meetings in New Orleans before losing last season's meeting. Hunter is 0-8 ATS after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of TULANE.TULANE is 1-10 ATS after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.TULANE is 0-6 ATS off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. TULANE is 9-23 L/32 ATS in home games versus sub par pressure defensive teams - forcing 12 or less turnovers/game . TEMPLE is 10-1 ATS after playing a game as a home favorite this season. TEMPLE is 15-6 ATS as a road underdog or pick over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at 3.7 . TEMPLE is 16-6 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking at -.07. CBB road team (TEMPLE) - average shooting team (42.5-45%) against an average defensive team (42.5-45%), average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) against a sub par rebounding team (-6 or less Reb/G) - 15+ games are 63-27 ATS L/26 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Temple to cover |
|||||||
03-05-23 | Houston v. Memphis +6 | 67-65 | Win | 100 | 5 h 4 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Tigers have revenge on board for a loss to the Cougars earlier this season and will be primed for an upset in revenge mode in their final home game of the season. Note: Memphis is 13-3 ATS series, including 6-0 ATS at home and 6-0 ATS when in revenge mode. The Tigers have played their best hoops at home this season going 13-1 SU and deserve respect here getting points at home vs a top tier side. Play on Memphis to cover |
|||||||
03-04-23 | Arizona v. UCLA -5 | 73-82 | Win | 100 | 11 h 27 m | Show | |
UCLA has revenge on board for a loss they suffered on the road to Arizona earlier this season. With this being the Wildcats 2nd straight road game Im betting their legs may not be able to handle a all out attack by an explosive Bruins side . In the Wildcats last game they had to play strong and hard vs a USC side that is not an easy out , and mustering that same kind of energy again will be difficult in my opinion.Cronin is 9-1 ATS in home games versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of UCLA with the average ppg diff clicking in at +20. UCLA is 9-0 ATS in home games versus teams who average 40 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. Play on UCLA |
|||||||
03-04-23 | Creighton v. DePaul +12.5 | 84-70 | Loss | -115 | 12 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. DePauls last home game of the season, should see them play very competitive ball. CREIGHTON is 1-10 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season DePaul to cover |
|||||||
03-04-23 | Connecticut v. Villanova +2.5 | 71-59 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 18 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Villanova has won 6 of their L/7 overall while, UConn after a 14-0 start this season are just 9-6 L/15 overall. With their NCAA tourney appearance prob guaranteed there will be no urgency for them. On the flipside the Cats need a win here and prob a conference tourney championship to turn the trick . Also with revenge on board for a loss to the Huskies earlier this season, Im betting we see a never say die type of performance from Villanova here at home this Saturday . VILLANOVA is 6-0 ATS in home games revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 3 seasons. CONNECTICUT is 0-6 ATS in road games after 2 straight games making 78% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.CONNECTICUT is 1-8 ATS in road games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. Villanova has won 6 of the L/8 meetings and are 6-1-1 ATS , and have achieved victory in 9 of their their Last 10 Home finales. CBB Home teams where the line is +3 to -3 (VILLANOVA) - off 3 straight wins against conference rivals, in March games are 32-12 L/5 seasons for a 73% conversion rate for bettors. Villanova to cover |
|||||||
03-04-23 | Kansas State v. West Virginia -4.5 | 81-89 | Win | 100 | 6 h 49 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Huggins West Virginia team needs this game badly. It's their last home game of the season, and they are definitely on the NCAA tourney bubble. Add in revenge for a loss they suffered to Kansas State earlier this season, and you have one very motivated side. Huggins has also had time to prepare his team for this tilt. Note: HC Bob Huggins is 15-0 SU in last home Games in his carreer when playing with three or more days of rest, including 7-0 SU/ATS as the main man at West Virginia. CBB road team (KANSAS ST) - after beating the spread by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games are 27-61 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 69% conversion rate for bettors. Play on West Virginia to cover |
|||||||
03-04-23 | Georgia v. South Carolina +1.5 | 55-61 | Win | 100 | 5 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. South Carolina to cover |
|||||||
03-04-23 | South Alabama +1.5 v. Southern Miss | 78-61 | Win | 100 | 4 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. South Alabama blasted Southern Miss by a 85-54 score on Feb 16th. The matchup discrepancies were obvious and now even with adjustments and revenge on board, my projections still estimate South Alabama has the edge. SOUTHERN MISS is 1-8 ATS revenging a blowout loss vs opponent of 20 points or more over the last 3 seasons. Play on South Alabama to cover |
|||||||
03-03-23 | Central Michigan v. Western Michigan -4.5 | 65-81 | Win | 100 | 12 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. In this season's first meeting, Western Michigan led for the vast majority of the game and held a double-digit advantage over CMU for much of the contest before falling asleep at the proverbial wheel as the Chippewas stormed back late and narrowly got by the Broncos, 70-69. Im betting Western Michigan will be wide awake here on Seniors night and will be prepared to take a conclusive win. The Broncos own a dominant 50-15 mark against Central Michigan in Kalamazoo, and have won back-to-back meetings at University Arena, including a 77-63 win on Feb. 12, 2022 Chippewas are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 games overall. Favorite is 8-2 ATS in the last 10 meetings. Home team is 5-1 ATS in the last 6 meetings. Western Michigan to cover |
|||||||
03-03-23 | Campbell v. Longwood OVER 131 | 81-68 | Win | 100 | 11 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a score closer to 136 which gives us plenty of value to cash an over ticket . CAMPBELL is 10-3 OVER in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game this season with a combined average of 137.3 ppg scored. Aldrich is 22-12 OVER when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of LONGWOOD with a combined average of 144.6 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams against the total (LONGWOOD) - off a home loss against a conference rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team are 26-3 OVER L/5 seasons for a 89% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score of those tilts clicking in at 150.2 ppg. Play over |
|||||||
03-03-23 | Indiana State -3 v. Belmont | 94-91 | Push | 0 | 6 h 28 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The fifth-seeded Indiana State Sycamores made history Thursday afternoon as they recorded the largest margin of victory ever in the history of the Missouri Valley Conference Tournament with a 97-58 win over No. 12 Evansville in the first round of Arch Madness inside the Enterprise Center. Looks like they mean business and with momentum on their sides will be hard to stop. BELMONT is 1-8 ATS in road games versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. Sycamores are 10-0 ATS L/10 overall. Play on Indiana State to cover |
|||||||
03-03-23 | Gardner-Webb v. USC Upstate UNDER 135 | 76-77 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 7 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. GARDNER WEBB is 6-0 UNDER in road games revenging a road loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 118.7 ppg scored.GARDNER WEBB is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 114.8 ppg. Play UNDER |
|||||||
03-02-23 | Pepperdine -1.5 v. Pacific | 71-84 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Favorites of less than 12 points in this Tourney have had alot of success in the past especially playing with revenge (cashed 13 of the L/14 times). Pepperdine has revenge on board for a loss they suffered earlier this season at Pacific. Romar is 20-7 ATS in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts as the coach of PEPPERDINE. Romar is 9-1 ATS as a neutral court favorite or pick as the coach of PEPPERDINE. Pepperdine has cashed 9 of their L/11 tilts in this tournament. PACIFIC is 8-22 ATS in conference tournament games since 1997 Pepperdine to cover |
|||||||
03-02-23 | Arizona -1.5 v. USC | 87-81 | Win | 100 | 6 h 12 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona owned USC in the first meeting this season winning by 81-66 count and Im betting nothing changes tonight. Enfield is 3-15 ATS in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making 37% or better of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of USC. Play on. Arizona to cover |
|||||||
03-02-23 | Michigan +4 v. Illinois | 87-91 | Push | 0 | 12 h 8 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Illinois Star Freshman Epps is expected to be out for tonights game after hitting the floor in practice. The events leading up to him suffering the concussion are unclear. He will be missed in a key game down the stretch. Advantage Michigan. ILLINOIS is 9-20 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. Fighting Illini are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 games overall. MICHIGAN is 34-21 ATS versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less over the last 3 seasons. Michigan is 6-1 SU L/7 overall. Michigan to cover |
|||||||
03-02-23 | Appalachian State v. South Alabama OVER 129 | 61-68 | Push | 0 | 7 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play over |
|||||||
03-01-23 | Southern Indiana +2 v. SIU-Edwardsville | 54-68 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. These teams split the season series with both sides winning on the others home court. SIUE won the first game but two weeks later Southern Indiana had adjusted and have the momentum and game plan needed to turn the trick again. SIU EDWARDSVL is 5-13 ATS in road games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. SIU EDWARDSVL is 1-8 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons.SIU EDWARDSVL is 2-10 ATS in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. CBB Neutral court teams (S INDIANA) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more are 23-4 ATS L/5 seasons for a 85% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Southern Indiana to cover |
|||||||
03-01-23 | Southeastern Louisiana -3 v. Houston Christian | 80-64 | Win | 100 | 3 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. SE Louisisana took the first meeting between these sides this season by a 71-59 count. Cottrell is 1-11 ATS in home games revenging a road loss vs opponent of 10 points or more as the coach of HOUSTON CHRISTIAN. HOUSTON CHRISTIAN is 2-9 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record this season with the average ppg diff clicking in at -20. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (SE LOUISIANA) - an average team (+/- 3.5 PPG diff.) against a poor team (-3.5 to -8 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a close win by 3 points or less are 97-47 ATS L/26 seasons for a 68% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Southeastern Louisiana to cover |
|||||||
03-01-23 | Auburn +10 v. Alabama | 85-90 | Win | 100 | 12 h 19 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Alabama played an exhausting back and forth game vs Arkansas last time out, and could easily find their energy levels depleted , especially with all the controversy surrounding the team of late. With that said, Im betting on Auburn being competitive tonight . Note: The Tigers are 10-2 ATS as a underdog of 10 points or more points in this series, including 8-0 ATS when the Tide are coming off a SU victory. I know Auburn was beaten up by Kentucky last time out, but it must also be noted that in their three previous games against Tennessee, Vanderbilt and Texas A&M on the road they lost by combined 8 points ( 2.66 ppg) . ALABAMA is 0-6 ATS off a close home win by 3 points or less over the last 3 seasons. ALABAMA is 1-11 ATS after allowing 75 points or more 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.ALABAMA is 0-10 ATS after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more over the last 2 seasonsALABAMA is 2-15 ATS after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. AUBURN is 22-12 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. Play on Auburn to cover |
|||||||
03-01-23 | Tulsa +14 v. South Florida | 56-72 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 19 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Bulls grabbed its first win against Tulsa ever two weeks ago in convincing fashion, beating TU 96-69 . However, now with revenge on board and this being the Canes last game of the season, Im betting they come out here and leave everything on the court in revenge mode, and to try to salvage a little bit of self respect after a horrendous season and play above themselves. S FLORIDA is 0-6 ATS in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. S FLORIDA is 2-11 ATS in home games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. CBB Road underdogs of 10 or more points (TULSA) - revenging a home blowout loss vs opponent of 20 points or more, off 2 consecutive home losses are 25-5 ATS L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors. TULSA is 6-0 against the spread versus S FLORIDA since 1997 in Florida. TULSA is 6-0 straight up against S FLORIDA since 1997 in Florida. Tulsa to cover |
|||||||
02-28-23 | Texas A&M -5 v. Ole Miss | 69-61 | Win | 100 | 14 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Aggies, who sit alone in second place in the Southeastern Conference, Im betting will continue their winning ways when they face a sub prime Ole Miss side on the road. The national leaders in free throws made and attempted, Texas A&M averages 1.5 more FTM/G than any other team in Div. I college basketball. Thats important when looking for a road cover .OLE MISS is 1-8 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games this season.OLE MISS is 3-11 ATS as an underdog this season and 4-13 ATS in home games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.TEXAS A&M is 15-7 ATS as a favorite this season and is 33-18 ATS L/51 as a road favorite or pick . Texas A&M to cover |
|||||||
02-28-23 | Buffalo -1 v. Northern Illinois | 85-75 | Win | 100 | 13 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Off playing Toledo last time out in a DD loss, this will seem like a walk in the park for Buffalo.Buffalo won the first meeting on Saturday, Jan. 7 by a score of 80-62 and a rinse and repeat situation is not out of the question according to my head to head matchup stats. In his career Head Coach Jim Whitesell is 7-1 against the Huskies.Whitesell is 8-0 ATS after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of BUFFALO. Play on Buffalo to cover |
|||||||
02-27-23 | West Virginia +4.5 v. Iowa State | 72-69 | Win | 100 | 11 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Mountaineers own five Quad 1 wins and a 12-1 record against Quad two, three and four opponents and deserve respect here in this line vs Iowa State in a game I have pegged to be very competitive. CBB team (IOWA ST) - an excellent defensive team (63 or less PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 55 points or less are 42-70 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 63% conversion rate for bettors. Play on West Virginia to cover |
|||||||
02-27-23 | Norfolk State v. North Carolina Central OVER 140.5 | 75-76 | Win | 100 | 14 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. NC CENTRAL is 7-1 OVER versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game this season with a combined average of 147.7 ppg scored. NORFOLK ST is 20-7 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5. NORFOLK ST is 6-0 OVER in road games in February games over the last 2 seasons with a combined 151.5 ppg scored. Road teams against the total (NORFOLK ST) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or more ) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 54-19 OVER L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
02-27-23 | Bellarmine v. North Florida OVER 140.5 | 76-74 | Win | 100 | 14 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play over |
|||||||
02-26-23 | Rutgers v. Penn State -2.5 | 59-56 | Loss | -115 | 10 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Penn State brings a three-game win streak into this home tilt against the Scarlet Knights, which has lost four of five including an ugly loss last time out. Penn State needs wins and might also need a top tier Big 10 tourney performance to secure a place in the big dance so you can bet they will be ready to perform here tongiht. Penn State also has redemption on board as well as revenge for a nasty loss at Rutgers 65-45 on Jan. 24. Since that defeat the Lions have awoken from their slumber and are now in full steam ahead mode. Pikiell is 0-7 ATS in road games off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 60 points as the coach of RUTGERS. RUTGERS is 5-16 ATS L/21 in road games after scoring 50 points or less . RUTGERS is 4-12 ATS in road games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots over the last 2 seasons. Shrewsberry is 7-0 ATS in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PENN ST.Shrewsberry is 7-0 ATS in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game as the coach of PENN ST. Shrewsberry is 10-1 ATS in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of PENN ST.Shrewsberry is 6-0 ATS off an upset win over a conference rival as an underdog as the coach of PENN ST.PENN ST is 10-1 ATS in home games after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. CBB Home teams where the line is +3 to -3 (PENN ST) - off 2 straight wins against conference rivals against opponent off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 60 points are 26-7 ATS L/5 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Penn State to cover |
|||||||
02-26-23 | UCLA v. Colorado +7 | 60-56 | Win | 100 | 7 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Colorado completely fell asleep at the proverbial wheel last time out losing to USC, 84-65, at the CU Events Center on Feb. 23. It must be noted however, that Boyle has proved resilient after an ugly loss going 6-0 ATS off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite as the coach of COLORADO. Colorado has played it best hoops at home winning 11 of 14 games . note: The Buffaloes have enjoyed a plus-10.9 scoring margin at home. Colorado is shooting 46.3 percent at home, compared to 40.1 percent in road games. The Buffaloes are holding opponents to 62.4 points on 41.9 percent from the field at home compared to 71.5 points and 45.4 percent in road contests and Im betting are capable of being competitive vs a powerful UCLA side. Colorado has made 63 of its last 75 free throws over the last five games (.840) which is significant for a physical side like the Buffs. Remember despite of their inconsistencies this Colorado team showed their abilities in a win at Tennessee earlier this season and deserve respect here in an cover opportunity this Sunday. Boyle is 6-0 ATS off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite as the coach of COLORADO.Boyle is 61-45 ATS in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game as the coach of COLORADO with the average ppg diff clicking in at +6.2. Play on Colorado to cover |
|||||||
02-26-23 | Wisconsin +5 v. Michigan | 79-87 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 60 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Considering the line offering from the books it must be noted that Wisconsin has played 17 games this season decided by five points or less (five in overtime), holding a 10-7 record in those contests. UW is now 22-8 in games decided by five or fewer points over the last two seasons.Sunday will mark the second meeting between Wisconsin and Michigan this season, as the Badgers earned a 64-59 victory over the Wolverines in the first meeting on Feb 14. That first meeting proved to me the Badgers matchup well vs the Wolverines.WISCONSIN is 8-1 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 3 seasons. Right now the Badgers D, is playing at a top tier level, and in an important game like this defense is key.WISCONSIN is 7-0 ATS after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. I also feel Michigan is being over rated here on this line, after their big upset win vs Iowa last time out. Note: MICHIGAN is 2-11 ATS in home games off an upset win by 10 points or more as an underdog. Wisconsin to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Santa Clara v. San Diego +7 | 81-63 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Santa Clara is in a letdown spot after a senior night win at home vs Pepperdine last time out and are now vulnerable here in this road game. I know San Diego may not inspire bettors but they have been competitive overall as compared to how the books have lined their games as is evident by covering 8 of their L/11 overall. San Diego to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Oral Roberts v. South Dakota State +4.5 | 69-65 | Win | 100 | 7 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Since the 2005 season, South Dakota State has recorded a 71-40-1 ATS (64%) at home in conference play and must not be underestimated to compete here vs a Oral Roberts. ORAL ROBERTS is 0-8 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons.S DAKOTA ST is 0-8 ATS after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.CBB Home teams as an underdog or pick (S DAKOTA ST) - good shooting team (45-47.5%) against an good defensive team (40-42.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making 47% or better of their shots are 42-16 ATS L/27 seasons for a 73% conversion rate for bettors. Play on South Dakota State to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Arkansas +8.5 v. Alabama | 83-86 | Win | 100 | 6 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. To many points here to lay with Alabama. I know their 14-1 in SEC play and loaded, but with all the crap thats happening around the program right now Im sure this team wont be as focused as they need to be against what is now a fully healthy Razorbacks side. I know Alabama beat up on the Arkansas in their first meeting winning by DDs, but it must be noted that ARKANSAS is 8-0 ATS revenging a loss vs opponent of 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. ARKANSAS is 26-13 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons. ARKANSAS is 16-3 ATS in February games over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (ALABAMA) - off a close win by 3 points or less over a conference rival, with 3+ more starters returning from last year than opponent are 32-66 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 67% conversion rate for bettors. Arkansas to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Maine v. Binghamton -2.5 | 71-67 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Binghamton to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Texas v. Baylor -3.5 | 72-81 | Win | 100 | 5 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Baylor looking to bounce back off two straight losses to Kansas and Kansas state will be primed to play hard here at home in a revenge spot vs Texas who has not played all that well on the road of late losing 3 of their L/4. In the first meeting between these two teams that essentially went down to the wire the Bears were missing some key players, but now their healthy and motivated and ready to lay down the hammer in a building they have accumulated a 13-2 record in this season. TEXAS is 0-8 ATS off 2 straight wins against conference rivals over the last 2 seasons.TEXAS is 4-15 ATS in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. Play on Baylor to cover |
|||||||
02-25-23 | Missouri v. Georgia +3.5 | 85-63 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Georgia after strong season, have lost back to back games by big DD margins, but from a long term trends standpoint it must be noted that sides like the Dawgs that are playing as underdogs at home with an above .500 record and off consecutive losses of 28 or more points are 7-1 ATS dating back 43 seasons. Georgia has covered 5 of their L/6 as home dogs and is also 3-0 ATS hosting as a pup or a chalk of 4 points or less in this series, and also 3-0 SU/ATS as a conference home dog when after suffering a defeat of 30 or more points. Georgia to cover. Meanwhile, Missou off a hard fought 66-64 win vs Miss State last time out. Note: Missouri is 0-6 ATS off a close win by 3 points or less over a conference rival over the last 3 seasons MISSOURI is 3-11 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 3 seasons. GEORGIA is 6-0 ATS in home games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. Play on Georgia to cover |
|||||||
02-24-23 | South Alabama +4.5 v. UL - Lafayette | 64-74 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Lafayette beat S.Alabama 79-76 in their first meeting this season, and now its redemption time for the visitors who are 6-0 ATS (revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. CBB Road teams as an underdog or pick (S ALABAMA) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Friday nights are 35-9 ATS L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. South Alabama to cover |
|||||||
02-24-23 | Fairfield v. Niagara OVER 124.5 | 68-76 | Win | 100 | 14 h 40 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play on the over |
|||||||
02-23-23 | San Diego v. Gonzaga UNDER 165.5 | 72-97 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a combined score of closer to 161 which gives us a two possesion edge on this totals offering. GONZAGA is 8-1 UNDER in home games after 2 straight games where they made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 148.3 ppg scored.GONZAGA is 6-0 UNDER after a road game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 149 ppg scored. Lavin is 17-5 UNDER versus very good shooting teams - making 48% or more of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997 with a combined average of 147.8 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is greater than or equal to 160 (GONZAGA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 84+ points/game on the season, after allowing 85 points or more are 30-5 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 86% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
02-23-23 | Northeastern v. Drexel -5.5 | 48-75 | Win | 100 | 11 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Dragons have won four in a row vs Northeastern, including a 76-55 win in Boston back in January proving to me from a data standpoint that they matchup well in tonights confrontation. I know Drexel has been slumping of late, losing three straight , but that is a good thing as we get to buy low here in this spot play ( Two of the losses came by 1 point and 3 points) The /Dragons can clinch 5th place with a win here in their final regular season game so a top tier effort is to be expected. Huskies are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. Dragons are 3-0-1 ATS in their last 4 home games. Dragons are 5-1-1 ATS in their last 7 home games vs. a team with a losing road record. Dragons are 5-1-1 ATS in their last 7 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of less than .400.Dragons are 22-7 ATS in their last 29 games following a straight up loss. Spiker is 12-3 ATS as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points in all games he has coached since 1997. Coen is 18-31 ATS L/49 versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NORTHEASTERN. CBB Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (DREXEL) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a bad team (20 to 40%) are 75-5 SU L/5 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +10.9 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on Drexel to cover |