Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-01-23 | Georgia v. Auburn OVER 140.5 | 73-94 | Win | 100 | 13 h 44 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My totals projection comes in at 146 giving us a full two possession edge to the over on this totals offering. AUBURN is 8-0 OVER versus good rebounding teams - out-rebounding opponents by 4+ per game after 15+games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 147.9 ppg scored.AUBURN is 20-8 OVER when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 148.9 ppg scored.Pearl is 17-7 OVER in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of AUBURN with a combined average of 151.4 ppg scored. GEORGIA is 14-5 OVER in road games versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or better over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 154.6 ppg going on the board.GEORGIA is 8-1 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 156.5 ppg scored.GEORGIA is 12-4 OVER as a road underdog or pick over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 148.5 ppg going on the scoreboard. CBB Road teams against the total (GEORGIA) - excellent free throw shooting team (73% or better ) against a good free throw shooting team (69-73%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 50-17 OVER L/5 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 149.3 ppg going on the scoreboard. Play over |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Army v. Lehigh -1.5 | 71-69 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Army defeated the Lehigh Mountain Hawks 80-78 in their last meeting on Dec. 30. Lehigh has however claimed the last two meetings inside Stabler Arena, the recent one coming in the Patriot League Quarterfinal where the Mountain Hawks came out on top, 91-77. Im betting on Lehigh getting revenge here tonight and to notch their 10th straight win overall. CBB underdog (ARMY) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games against opponent after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games are 4-26 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 87% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Lehigh to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Tennessee v. Florida +5.5 | 54-67 | Win | 100 | 10 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Florida Gators, despite of a 64-50 loss at fifth-ranked Kansas State in SEC/Big12 competition , have won five of six in league play and deserve respect here at home vs Tennessee.Florida has held 11 of its previous 13 opponents to under 40-percent shooting, including seven of its eight SEC opponents and Im betting it will once again be their defense that keeps them competitive against this top tier Vols program. FLORIDA is 7-0 ATS after scoring 55 points or less over the last 2 seasons. TENNESSEE is 0-6 ATS in road games after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. Play on Florida to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Albany +14 v. UMass Lowell | 50-66 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Albany despite of a sub par record matches up well against Umass -Lowell beating tem January at home by a 89-63 count. I know revenge is now on board for the home side , but it must be noted UMASS-LOWELL is 0-7 ATS revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -6.7. ALBANY is 34-16 ATS in road games against conference opponents.ALBANY is 19-6 ATS in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game. CBB Home teams as a favorite or pick (UMASS-LOWELL) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average offensive team (67-74 PPG), after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less are 8-34 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 81% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Albany to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Fresno State +4.5 v. Wyoming | 62-85 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 23 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Fresno State is second in the MW in scoring defense in conference play (65.22 points allowed per MW game) Im betting it will be the Bulldogs D, that makes life difficult for the Wyoming Cowboys. Also in a game that the linesmkaers have pegged to be closely contested Fresno State top tier charity stripe shooting will give them a needed edge. Bulldogs enter this tilt having made 73.7 percent of its free throws (205-278), which has a chance to track down the school record for single-season free throw percentage (74.2 percent, 484-652, 1991-92). WYOMING is 0-6 ATS versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game this season. Fresno State defeated Wyoming 58-53 in both teams' MW opener back on Dec. 28 at the Save Mart Center- Wyoming's L/11 revenge opportunities have seen an average 1.1 ppg diff. Four of the last five games in the series have been decided by five points or fewer. Play on Fresno State to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Kansas State v. Kansas -6.5 | 78-90 | Win | 100 | 12 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Revenge and redemption on board for Kansas tonight at home after a 83-82 loss on the road earlier this season in these rivals only meeting. The Kansas Jayhawks are 4-0 SU/ATS L/4 opportunities when seeking same-season revenge against the Kansas State, with every victory coming by by double-digit margins.Self is 26-12 ATS revenging a same season loss vs opponent as the coach of KANSAS with the average ppg margin clicking in just around under 10 ppg. Kansas is No. 8 in the NET Rankings through games played on Jan. 29. Kansas is No. 1 in NET Strength of Schedule and its eight Quadrant 1 wins are the most in NCAA Division I. Play on Kansas to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Akron -2 v. Buffalo | 81-64 | Win | 100 | 10 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. AKRON is 8-1 ATS versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. Whitesell is 1-10 ATS in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. Akron to cover |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Alabama State v. Florida A&M UNDER 127 | 58-69 | Push | 0 | 15 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Alabama State has the fourth-best scoring defense in the SWAC, allowing 66.4 PPG. The Rattlers have one of the best defenses in the SWAC, allowing 64.5 PPG (2nd best). CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (ALABAMA STATE/FLORIDA A&M) - in a game involving two poor rebounding teams (-3 to -6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 32-4 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 89% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Jackson State v. Southern -8 | 62-73 | Win | 100 | 14 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Southern matches up very well here at home vs visiting Jackson State. This season Southern is 6-0 vs common opponents winning by an average of 11.7 ppg. My projections are estimating a DD win for the hosts, giving us a viable edge on this line offering. Woods is 12-0 ATS n home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 45% or worse after 15+ games as the coach of SOUTHERN U with the average ppg diff clicking at +19. Woods is 10-0 ATS in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SOUTHERN U which was the case last time out with the average ppg diff clicking in at +17.5/ Woods is 9-1 ATS in a home game where the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of SOUTHERN U with the average ppg diff clicking in at +21.1 . Play on Southern to cover |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Iowa State v. Texas Tech +1.5 | 77-80 | Win | 100 | 14 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Tech's 34-point loss in Ames is its biggest margin of defeat this season and came after the Red Raiders beat ISU by 31 (72-41) in the Big 12 Championship quarterfinals last season. Iowa State got their revenge, but now its payback time for the Raiders in the rematch. Quote:"We've got payback on Monday," Obanor said. "It's the second half of Big 12 and it starts over. It's an 18-round fight and is truly exciting to see what we can do and what we can become. February is when players become players. The season is not over and I'm excited to show the world who we are and what we can become." End Quote. Tech had a 29-game home winning streak end with its first Big 12 home game this season after going 8-0 at home in non-conference play…. Its a prime opportunity to end a 4 game home losing streak here tonight vs a side that has lost 5 of 9 road games this season and in a look ahead situation to playing Kanas in their next tilt. Note: Iowa State is 3-22 SU L/25 away prior to facing Jayhawks. IOWA ST is 20-39 ATS L/59 on the road when the line is +3 to -3 . CBB home team (TEXAS TECH) - good free throw shooting team (69-73%) against an average free throw shooting team (65-69%), after a game where a team made 50% of their 3 point shots or better are 92-54 ATS L/5 seasons for a 63% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Texas Tech to cover |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Detroit v. Youngstown State -8.5 | 63-73 | Win | 100 | 5 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Youngstown State led the nation as the highest team offensive efficiency rating, per teamrankings.com. The Penguins ranked first with 1.145 points per possession. Over the last three games. The offensive efficiency of Youngstown State was 1.150 points per possession and its obvious to me that they matchup very well against a Jesuit group that is 0-6 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -11.2. This is Detroit Mercy's 2nd road game in 3 nights and fatigue could easily set in here this tilt progresses. CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (DETROIT) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 85 points or more are 19-52 L/5 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -11.1 ppg. Play on Youngstown State to cover |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Oakland v. Robert Morris OVER 140 | 63-68 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a combined score of 145 giving us a full 2 plus possession cushion to the over on the offered number. ROBERT MORRIS is 7-0 OVER versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 155 ppg scored. OAKLAND is 32-18 OVER versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 150.8 ppg going on the scoreboard.OAKLAND is 9-1 OVER after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 160.5 ppg scored.Kampe is 21-8 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 144.5 as the coach of OAKLAND. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ROBERT MORRIS) - off a home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season are 93-38 OVER L/26 seasons for a 71% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Michigan State +8 v. Purdue | 61-77 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Michigan State has won nine of its last 12 games and enters the game on Sunday with a 14-7 overall record, including a 6-4 mark in Big Ten play and must not be underestimated in their ability to compete here this afternoon vs streaking Purdue. The Spartans, have played one of the nation's toughest schedules to open the season, having faced the No. 1 toughest slate of opposing offenses in the country, the 19th-toughest slate of opposing defenses and rank No. 3 overall in strength of schedule. They are battle tested and get my backing to cover . MSU is 3rd in the B1G in scoring defense (64.10 ppg), 2nd in FG% defense (41.3%) and 1st in 3-point defense (28.5%).Tom Izzo is 28-22 in his career against Purdue.Spartans are 7-3 ATS in their last 10 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. PURDUE is 4-12 ATS in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. Purdue is 0-6 ATS in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. Boilermakers are 1-6-1 ATS in their last 8 home games. Boilermakers are 1-9-2 ATS in their last 12 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of less than .400. CBB Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (MICHIGAN ST) - revenging a home loss vs opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive close wins by 5 or less over a conference rival are 79-39 ATS L/26 seasons for a 67% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Michigan State to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Utah v. Oregon -4 | 56-68 | Win | 100 | 10 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oregon matches up very well vs Utah and beat them by 10 points on the road a few weeks ago and have are 22-2 SU overall record against Utah under Coach Altman including winning 10 in a row against Utah. I know Oregon despite of alot top tier talent does not always play up to expectations, but are more than capable of a big game here vs the Utes at home. UTAH is 0-6 ATS in road games revenging a home loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.UTAH is also 2-9 ATS versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. CBB road team (UTAH) - revenging a home loss vs opponent of 10 points or more, with 2 more starters returning from last year than opponent are 279-399 L/26 seasons for a go against 59% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Oregon to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Chattanooga +3 v. East Tennessee State | 73-64 | Win | 100 | 8 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. E TENN ST is 0-9 ATS in home lined games this season.E TENN ST is 0-7 ATS as a home favorite or pick this season. E TENN ST is 0-6 ATS in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game this season. UT-CHATTANOOGA is 7-0 ATS after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. Play on Chattanooga to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Northern Colorado +2 v. Northern Arizona | 73-83 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N.Arizona has lost 9 of their L/10 with their lone victory coming by 1 point, and they are a sub 500 side. I know N.Colorado may not inspire bettors either, but according to my power rankings matchup well here overall, and have won 2 of their L/3 games, while showing passing discipline. N COLORADO is 10-0 ATS after a game committing 8 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. .N ARIZONA is 1-9 ATS as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.N ARIZONA is 1-8 ATS in home games when playing against a sub par team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. Play on N.Colorado to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Illinois -1.5 v. Wisconsin | 61-51 | Win | 100 | 6 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Illinois has won five in a row over Wisconsin and Im betting on the 6th in a row comes here today.
Illinois has won its last two road game by an average margin of 22.0 points. Illinois leads all Big Ten teams with 22 road wins in league play over the last four years and are more than capable of turning the trick here again in this key Big 10 showdown. In its five Big Ten wins, Illinois is averaging 75.4 points while holding opponents to 61.0 points. Underwood is 6-0 ATS in road games versus sub par foul drawing teams - attempting 15 or less free throws/game as the coach of ILLINOIS. Play on Illinois to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Alabama v. Oklahoma +6.5 | 69-93 | Win | 100 | 6 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oklahoma has lost 3 straight and have struggled in Big 12 competition against some of the best teams in the nation, while Alabama is streaking the other way winning 9 straight tilts . But from a matchup perspective the Sooners have the capabilities to slow Alabama down and to use the crowed noise to their advantage. The Sooners have nine players on the roster average 10 minutes or more so their depth will help them. Oklahoma is about the same offensively and defensively nationally in efficiency per 100 possessions. I know Sooners dont look remarkable, while the Tide have opened eyes with their fast paced take no prisoners style, but like I said the Sooners can compete. Oklahoma plays at about the same pace as Mississippi state which Alabama barley got by last time out with a late 3 pointer. ALABAMA is 1-9 ATS L/10 after 8 or more consecutive wins since 1997. OKLAHOMA is 9-1 ATS as a home underdog or pick over the last 3 seasons. OKLAHOMA is 13-3 ATS L/16 in home games against SEC opponents. ALABAMA is 4-16 ATS L/20 in road games against Big 12 conference opponents. Oklahoma is 3-0 SU/ATS L/3 at home in this series. Oklahoma to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Stetson v. Queens NC OVER 154.5 | 65-71 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projection's make this total closer to 158 giving a 2 possession edge to the over. Queens is averaging just under 90 points per game on offense at home this season, and will attack again with wreck-less abandon at a fast pace, and force Stetson into opening up. This Im betting results in a fairly high scoring affair that eclipses this total. QUEENS U - CHAR is 6-0 OVER versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 18 or less free throws/game after 15+ games this season with a combined average of 169.2 ppg scored. STETSON is 6-0 OVER after 1 or more consecutive losses this season with a combined average of 157.8 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (STETSON) - in a game involving two sub standard defensive teams (45-47.5%), after a game where a team made 20% of their 3 point shots or worse are 44-12 OVER L/26 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 161.5 ppg scored. Play on the over |
|||||||
01-27-23 | North Dakota v. North Dakota State OVER 140 | 75-91 | Win | 100 | 13 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Both these teams have eclipsed the offered total in their L/4 games and Im betting on another higher scoring affair than the Totals number being offered. North Dakota State has allowed just under 77 points on the road this season while N.Dakota has averaged 77 points on offense in their home games, and Im betting that this aggregate average continues with the visitors doing more than enough damage offensively to get us over this number. Sather is 12-4 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 144.5 as the coach of N DAKOTA with a combined average of 149.6 ppg scored. Sather is 6-0 OVER in road games after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more as the coach of N DAKOTA with a combined average of 151.3 ppg scored. N DAKOTA ST in their L/7 home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons have seen a combined average of 149.1 ppg scored. NBA Road teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (N DAKOTA) - revenging a blowout loss vs opponent of 20 points or more against opponent off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival are 32-10 OVER L/26 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
01-27-23 | Detroit +1 v. Robert Morris | 77-85 | Loss | -110 | 27 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This will be just the seventh all time meeting between the two schools as the Titans are 6-0 all-time, 5-0 since the Colonials joined the Horizon League including a 87-75 win at home this season . Im now betting behind the nations top scorer at 26.4 points per game, graduate senior (Antoine Davis) will be the difference maker for the road side.The Titans have shot over 50.0% as a team in each of the last five meetings against Robert Morris posting 50.8%, 50.9% and 55.6% in 2021, 50.9% last year and 52.7% in the match-up two weeks ago. Rinse and repeat on the agenda. ROBERT MORRIS is 1-8 ATS as a home favorite of 6 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons. Play on Detroit Mercy to cover |
|||||||
01-27-23 | Manhattan v. Niagara -5.5 | 62-68 | Win | 100 | 11 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Niagara was upset by Manhattan as road favs back on Jan 8th and will now be in revenge and redemption mode and ready for payback on their own home floor tonight. NIAGARA is 6-0 ATS in home games revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +15.3 ppg. Niagara has momentum after a win last time out, - beating St.Peters by a 59-57 count - NIAGARA is 6-0 ATS after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons with a average ppg diff clicking in at +13 ppg. Play on Niagara to cover |
|||||||
01-26-23 | Arizona -5.5 v. Washington State | 63-58 | Loss | -105 | 15 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona has revenge on board for a embarrassing loss to Washington State at home 74-61 earlier in league play this season as 12 plus point chalk. Now with redemption at hand you can bet the Wildcats will be wide awake in the rematch and ready to lay down a beating of mammoth proportions. Arizona is 9-1 ATS L/10 at Wash State, and Im betting on another cover this evening by the powerful visitors. It must also be noted that the Cougars are off a another tepid offensive showing last time out and Im expecting more output issues against this type of shut down D.WASHINGTON ST is 0-8 ATS in home games after scoring 60 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The Cougars have averaged 63.1 ppg in their L/5 games and that just wont get the job done tonight against a side that will be flying in transition. Play on Arizona to cover |
|||||||
01-26-23 | Tennessee State v. SE Missouri State OVER 153.5 | 75-92 | Win | 100 | 13 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My totals projections come in at 157 which gives us a two possession edge on this total being eclipsed. SE MISSOURI ST is 9-2 OVER versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season with a combined average of 159.1 ppg going on the board. TENNESSEE ST is 8-0 OVER after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 159 ppg going on the scoreboard. CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (SE MISSOURI ST) - after a home game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a road favorite are 29-4 OVER L/26 seasons for a 86% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 164.1 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
01-26-23 | SIU-Edwardsville v. Tennessee Tech +2 | 68-80 | Win | 100 | 12 h 44 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. SIUE comes into this road matchup following back-to-back home defeats last weekend.. The Cougars dropped a 67-58 decision to Morehead State last Thursday before falling to Southern Indiana in an 82-72 contest on Saturday and lack momentum at a critical time vs a Tennessee Tech side that has revenge on board for a earlier loss this season to SIUE on the road. Tenn Tech has won 5 of their L/6 overall, and have owned this series at home winning 6 of the L/7 matchups.Im betting home court advantage prevails in a cover opportunity. SIU EDWARDSVL is 0-6 ATS when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons. CBB team (SIU EDWARDSVL) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or more ) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, after a game - attempting 20+ less free throws than opponent are 6-23 L/5 seasons for. go against 79% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Tennessee Tech to cover |
|||||||
01-25-23 | Indiana v. Minnesota OVER 136.5 | 61-57 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this total closer to 141 giving us a full 2 possession value to the over on the current offering. Ben is 8-1 OVER in home games versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA with a combined average of 141.9 ppg scored.Ben is 8-1 OVER in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA with a combined average of 142.6 ppg scored.MINNESOTA is 11-2 OVER in home games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 142.8 ppg scored. CBB Road teams where the total is between 130 and 139.5 points (INDIANA) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a conference rival, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a bad team (20% to 40%) are 33-7 OVER L/26 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors. CBB Road teams where the total is between 130 and 139.5 points (INDIANA) - after beating the spread by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a team with a losing record are 51-18 OVER L/26 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
01-25-23 | Texas A&M v. Auburn -4 | 79-63 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Auburn’s 28-game home win streak is the longest in the nation and Im betting it continues tonight against Texas A&M as the home side has revenge for a loss they suffered in the SEC tourney last season. Note: Auburn has cashed 8 of their L/9 ATS revenge scenarios from a SEC tourney defeat. Tigers beat Texas A&M at home last season 75-58 . AUBURN is 9-2 ATS in home games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots over the last 2 seasons. Play on Auburn to cover |
|||||||
01-25-23 | Houston v. UCF OVER 127 | 82-71 | Win | 100 | 12 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Temple upset Houston last time out, and now Im expecting Houston to be in full blown redemption mode , and to open up their offense in more aggressive fashion after a grinding 56-55 defeat. This will force a capable UCF offense into opening up or be blown off the court. When these teams met back in the end of the December the Cougars took a 71-65 victory and a rinse and repeat type of offensive output by both sides is expected Sampson is 12-4 OVER in a road game where the total is 129.5 or less as the coach of HOUSTON with a combined average of 133.4 ppg scored. CBB Road teams where the total is 129.5 or less (HOUSTON) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 39-9 OVER L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 133.2 ppg scored. CFB Home teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (UCF) - revenging a same season loss vs opponent, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite are 39-13 L/26 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 133.5 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
01-25-23 | Lehigh -2 v. Holy Cross | 74-68 | Win | 100 | 12 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Lehigh has won 6 straight games and enter this tilt with momentum. According to my power rankings the Mountain Hawks matchup well here. The Mountain Hawks claimed the first meeting inside Stabler Arena on Jan. 11 (76-58) and are a viable short fav to earn the season sweep of the Crusaders.Lehigh had won four straight matchups before falling to the Crusaders last year in the Hart Center on Jan. 28, 2022 (67-65) to split the season series a year ago.LEHIGH is 7-1 ATS against conference opponents this season.LEHIGH is 7-0 ATS versus teams who average 33 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+games over the last 2 seasons.LEHIGH is 6-0 ATS versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. Play on Lehigh to cover |
|||||||
01-24-23 | Air Force v. San Jose State OVER 126 | 52-82 | Win | 100 | 17 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. AIR FORCE is 8-2 OVER after playing a game as an underdog this season with a combined average score of 139 ppg scored. CBB Road teams where the total is 129.5 or less (AIR FORCE) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 38-9 OVER L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (SAN JOSE ST) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%) are 41-18 OVER L/5 seasons for a 71% conversion rate for bettors. Play OVER |
|||||||
01-24-23 | Georgia Tech +11 v. Clemson | 51-72 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned The last three meetings between Tech and Clemson at Littlejohn Coliseum have been decided by a total of eight points. The game-winning winning points were scored with 15, 1 and 14 seconds on the clock, respectively. Mark Twain once said that “History never repeats itself, but it does often rhymes. Note:Tech leads the ACC in three-point defense, allowing 29.2 percent from distance this season in all games and Im betting it is this that will help them stay within the number tonight. GTech to cover |
|||||||
01-24-23 | Kent State v. Northern Illinois +14 | 76-86 | Win | 100 | 15 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.
CBB road team (KENT ST) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or more ) playing a team with a losing record are just 6-33 L/5 seasons for a go against 84% conversion rate for bettors. Northern Illinois to cover |
|||||||
01-24-23 | Eastern Michigan +19.5 v. Toledo | 79-84 | Win | 100 | 14 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Eastern Michigan has found great success from the free throw line this year with the Eagles converting 74.3 percent, which ranks fourth in the MAC. Through 19 games played (Jan. 21), the Eagles have made their way to the charity stripe 20+ times in 10 games, including in five of the last six games, in which Eastern is converting at 75.6 percent clip. This will be a key component for us to get the cover tonight.
Eastern Michigan to cover |
|||||||
01-23-23 | Delaware State v. South Carolina State UNDER 147 | 88-85 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 7 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned DELAWARE ST is 13-4 UNDER L/17 vs. teams who are called for 3+ more fouls/game than their opponents with a combined average of 130.7 ppg scored. S CAROLINA ST is 12-2 UNDER L/14 versus teams who average 33 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+games with a combined average of 132.4 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (DELAWARE ST) - after 5 or more consecutive losses, in a game involving two struggling teams (20% or worse ) are 31-9 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 135.8 ppg scored. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-23-23 | Norfolk State v. Morgan State +4.5 | 71-77 | Win | 100 | 9 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Morgan State had a 6 game win streak end abruptly end last time out in DD, beatdown vs Howard on the road. However, now here t home in a big game against conference front runner Norfolk State Im expecting a big bounce back and competitive tilt from the Bears. Note: Morgan has started the 2022-23 season 7-0 at home and now have 10 consecutive victories at the Hill Field House. Jones is 1-9 ATS in road games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of NORFOLK ST. ( The Bears are No. 3 in the MEAC shooting 47.1 percent from the field and No. 2 from beyond the arc (.376).) Play on Morgan St to cover |
|||||||
01-23-23 | Chicago State v. Coastal Carolina UNDER 144.5 | 74-70 | Win | 100 | 10 h 4 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections suggest a combined score of 140 points which gives us a two possession advantage to the under. CHICAGO ST is 8-1 UNDER versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season with a combined average of 137.3 ppg scored. CHICAGO ST is 11-3 UNDER when the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 138.3 ppg scored. CHICAGO ST is 10-2 UNDER L/12 in a road game where the total is 140 to 144.5 with a combined average of 135.3 ppg scored. Ellis is 22-11 UNDER in home games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of COASTAL CAROLINA with a combined average of 138.6 ppg going on the scoreboard in that 33 game sample size. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (COASTAL CAROLINA) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a conference rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a bad team (20 to 40%) are 25-8 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 85% conversion rate with a combined average of 133.5 ppg scored. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-23-23 | Duke +3 v. Virginia Tech | 75-78 | Push | 0 | 10 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned Coach K’ is no long er at the helm of this top tier Duke program but the team is still viable and must not be underestimated as dogs with revenge on board for a regular season 15-point beatdown they took VTech last season in the beloved coaches farewell campaign. Now with redemption on hand look for the Blue Devils to get the job done in revenge mode vs a Hokies side that has lost 7 straight games. Young is 4-15 ATS after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of VIRGINIA TECH. Duke has held 17 of the 19 opponents to below their season scoring average and is 14-3 in those games. Seven scored their then-season low for points, including holding Iowa to a then-season-low 62, Xavier to 64 (20 points below its average) and Miami to a season-low tying 66 (12 off its scoring average).Duke's strong defensive numbers come against a schedule rated 24th-toughest versus opponent offenses . Defense Im betting gets us the cover. Young is 3-14 ATS (-12.4 Units) versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less after 15+ games as the coach of VIRGINIA TECH. VIRGINIA TECH is 0-9 ATS off a road loss against a conference rival over the last 2 season. VIRGINIA TECH is 0-7 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. VIRGINIA TECH is 1-11 ATS versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game this season. DUKE in 8 tilts against conference opponents this season have seen aggregate scores that are essentially even at 70 points each. Play on Duke to cover |
|||||||
01-22-23 | Wichita State +2 v. SMU | 71-69 | Win | 100 | 6 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Shockers have won five straight in this series have won all three AAC era visits to Moody. Note: WSU had held 12 of its first 17 opponents under 40% shooting (.372 collectively). Against a SMU side that owns 39.1% FG conversion rate over their L/5 the Shockers have an edge.
WICHITA ST is 10-0 ATS in a road game where the total is 130 to 134.5 over the last 3 seasons Play on Wichita State to cover . |
|||||||
01-22-23 | NJIT v. Vermont -12 | 69-85 | Win | 100 | 4 h 6 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Catamounts have won by an average margin of 14.7 points per game in their three conference victories and have held opponents to a 38.8% field goal percentage, and 25.4% three-point percentage.The Cats are 4-1 at home, and have outscored opponents by 14.4 points per game at Patrick Gym.Vermont earned victories in all three games against NJIT last season, including a 98-59 victory in the 2022 America East Quarterfinals. Key players tonight , Aaron Deloney averaged 13.7 points per game and a 63.6% three-point percentage against Tech last seasons, and he will be key what Im betting will be another conclusive victory in this series. VERMONT is 10-2 ATS in home games when playing against a struggling team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) after 15 or more games with the average ppg diff clicking in at +15.4 ppg. Play on Vermont to cover |
|||||||
01-22-23 | Central Connecticut State v. Long Island UNDER 142.5 | 58-42 | Win | 100 | 4 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this total closer to 139 giving us a full one possession plus edge to the under. C CONN ST is 11-2 UNDER when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 128 ppg scored C CONN ST is 8-1 UNDER in road games versus struggling teams - outscored by their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 128.3 ppg scored. C CONN ST is 10-1 UNDER in January games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average score of 130.2 ppg scored. C CONN ST is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 128.4 ppg going on the board. LONG ISLAND is 16-7 UNDER when the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons, LONG ISLAND is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) after a game giving up 5 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 134.9 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (LONG ISLAND) - after 5 or more consecutive losses, in a game involving two terrible teams (20% or less) are 30-9 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-21-23 | Gonzaga v. Pacific +18.5 | 99-90 | Win | 100 | 2 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Pacific to cover (LATE STEAM) |
|||||||
01-21-23 | Texas A&M Corpus Christi v. Houston Christian +9 | 78-90 | Win | 100 | 12 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB team (TEXAS A&M CC) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or better ) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, after a game - attempting 20+ less free throws than opponent are 6-22 L/5 seasons for a go against 79% conversion rate for bettors. Houston Christian to cover |
|||||||
01-21-23 | Texas Southern v. Alabama A&M OVER 142 | 70-59 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (TEXAS SOUTHERN /ALABAMA A&M) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (42.5-45%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) are 32-2 OVER L/26 seasons for a 94% conversion rate for bettors. Play OVER |
|||||||
01-21-23 | UCLA +1.5 v. Arizona | 52-58 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UCLA is an explosive side and deserve respect here vs Arizona . The Bruins are unbeaten in conference play with an 8-0 record and are in revenge mode for a loss they suffered to the Wildcats in last years PAC 12 tournament. Note:0-9 SU S at home in this series when UCLA is in revenge mode and Im betting that trend stays alive when the final buzzer goes off this afternoon. Play on UCLA to cover |
|||||||
01-21-23 | Jacksonville State v. Stetson -5.5 | 81-87 | Win | 100 | 6 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (STETSON) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a bad team (20 to 40%) are 71-5 L/5 seasons for a 94% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at +10.9 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on Stetson |
|||||||
01-21-23 | TCU +7.5 v. Kansas | 83-60 | Win | 100 | 5 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Both these sides are off losses. Kansas lost to Kansas state and TCU who previously beat Kansas State lost on a letdown effort vs West Virginia . Both will be primed for a bounce back. TCU is being under rate here while Kansas despite of big time winning record have taken part in a lot of close affairs lately are looking mortal.
CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (KANSAS) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against a good defensive team (63-67 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less RE 15-36 ATS L/5 SEASONS for a go against 71% conversion rate. Play on TCU |
|||||||
01-21-23 | College of Charleston v. Northeastern +9.5 | 87-61 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 19 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Kelsey is 2-10 ATS L/12 after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more in all games he has coached . Coen is 16-6 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NORTHEASTERN. CBB road team (COLL OF CHARLESTON) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 5-32 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against for a 87% go against conversion rate. Play on Northeastern to cover |
|||||||
01-20-23 | Boise State +2 v. New Mexico | 79-81 | Push | 0 | 14 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Boise State is currently the top hoops program in the Mountain West at both ends of the floor and Im betting nothing changes tonight. I know New Mexico has played some top level ball of late, and have a signature win vs San Diego State , but it was Aztecs foul troubles that doomed them in that tilt and help New Mexico get the win. Here tonight against the disciplined Broncos they wont have that advantage. Broncos are 22-7-1 ATS in their last 30 road games vs. a team with a winning home record. Broncos are 20-7-1 ATS in their last 28 road games vs. a team with a home winning % of greater than .600. Lobos are 3-9 ATS in their last 12 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of greater than .600. CBB Road teams as an underdog or pick (BOISE ST) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Friday nights are 32-8 ATS L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate. Play on Boise State to cover |
|||||||
01-20-23 | Toledo v. Buffalo UNDER 168 | 86-77 | Win | 100 | 12 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a combined score closer to 163 giving us a 2 full possession value to the under in what should be a fairly physical MAC clash. Both these sides are off huge offensive outputs last time out with Toledo hitting the 90 point plateau on top tier 3 point shooting while Buffalo smashed out 100 plus points. Now Im betting on offensive regression. Note: TOLEDO L/51 games after a game where they made 50% of their 3 point shots or better haver seen a combined average score of 142.3 ppg going on the board. BUFFALO is 11-3 UNDER versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 147.1 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points (BUFFALO) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games are 32-8 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at 154.2 ppg. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-20-23 | Villanova v. St. John's -4 | 57-49 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This game has important implications for Big East Tournament seeding and NCAA tournament placement. The advantage however, goes to St.Johns as hosts playing a uptempo pace, creating a chaotic situation for most teams, and that will be especially evident vs a side like the Wildcats who continually looked flustered on D, allowing open shot after open shot. Note: The /Storm have covered 71% of their L/17 games as hosts in this series vs Villanova ... Add in revenge for a loss on the road to Villanova earlier this season, and you have a viable opportunity to lay points and cash a ticket. CBB team (ST JOHNS) - revenging a same season loss vs opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog of 12 points or more are 108-59 ATS L/26 seasons for a 65% conversion rate. Play on St.Johns to cover |
|||||||
01-19-23 | UC San Diego v. Cal Poly OVER 124.5 | 71-64 | Win | 100 | 13 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CAL SAN DIEGO is 25-12 OVER against conference opponents over the last 3 seasons with the average combined score clicking in at 143.2 ppg. CAL POLY-SLO is 22-7 OVER in home games after 4 or more consecutive losses with a combined average of 149.4 ppg scored. CBB Road teams where the total is 129.5 or less (CAL SAN DIEGO) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 36-9 OVER L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
01-19-23 | Florida Atlantic v. Texas-San Antonio +16.5 | 83-64 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. FL Atlantic is on a roll but this according to my projections is just to many points to lay with them on the road vs a UTSA side that has a buy low sign written all over them. FLA ATLANTIC is 14-28 ATS L/42 in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 4+ points/game. TX-SAN ANTONIO is 27-13 ATS L/40 in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. TX-SAN ANTONIO is 9-0 ATS after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. CBB road team (FLA ATLANTIC) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (>=80%) playing a team with a losing record are 4-33 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 89% conversion rate for bettors. Play on UTSA to cover |
|||||||
01-19-23 | UMKC v. North Dakota OVER 125.5 | 60-77 | Win | 100 | 11 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N DAKOTA is 16-6 OVER L/22 versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or better after 15+ games with a combined average of 150.4 ppg scored.N DAKOTA is 7-1 OVER after playing a road game this season with a combined averageof MISSOURI-KC is 11-1 OVER versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average score of 155.2 ppg scored.MISSOURI-KC is 6-0 OVER in road games versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game this season with a combined average of 143.8 ppg scored. MISSOURI-KC is 6-0 OVER in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game this season with a combined average of 141.7 ppg going on the scoreboard. MISSOURI-KC is 16-3 OVER versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 season with a combined average of 147.2 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (MISSOURI-KC) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 32-8 OVER L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at 133.1 ppg. |
|||||||
01-18-23 | Cincinnati v. South Florida OVER 140.5 | 85-69 | Win | 100 | 10 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CINCINNATI is 14-4 OVER after allowing 55 points or less in a win against a conference rival last time out which was the case in a very physical grinding affair vs SMU last time out in a 54-52 victory. Now Im expecting a more wide open style of game as that tilt will exhausting and natural on the road against a USF side that plays a more wide open style of hoops. This Im betting leads to a much higher scoring tilt that the lines makers are estimating. S FLORIDA is 11-2 OVER versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game this season with a combined average of 145.4 ppg. S FLORIDA is 7-1 OVER as an underdog this season with a combined average of 174.4 ppg. CBB Road teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (CINCINNATI) - off a road no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a team with a losing record are 47-10 OVER L/26 seasons for a 84% conversion rate with a combined average of 155.7 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
01-18-23 | Furman v. Chattanooga | 77-69 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UTC ranks 26th in NCAA DI with a 38.3% three-point FG percentage and this will be key to getting by an explosive Furman offense.Entering NCAA DI action on Tuesday (1/17), Chattanooga ranks No. 1 in NCAA Division I behind an 11.9 three-pointers per game average.
CBB team (FURMAN) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or better) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, after a game - attempting 20+ less free throws than opponent are 5-23 L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate for bettors. Chattanooga to cover/win |
|||||||
01-18-23 | Connecticut v. Seton Hall +5.5 | 66-67 | Win | 100 | 8 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. After a fast start to their campaign Connecticut is finally fallen back down to earth. Im betting the decent continues tonight vs revenge minded and under rated Seton Hall that lost to the Huskies in last seasons big East tourney. If Uconn do win it wont come easily. CONNECTICUT is 1-9 ATS in road games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. CONNECTICUT is 3-15 ATS after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. Holloway is 10-2 AT versus good shooting teams - making >=45% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Seton Hall to cover |
|||||||
01-18-23 | Bucknell v. Army OVER 142 | 68-66 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 42 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a combined score of closer to 147 which gives us a full two possession advantage on this offering. BUCKNELL is 13-3 OVER in road games versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 157 ppg. BUCKNELL is 10-2 OVER versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 149.1 ppg scored.BUCKNELL is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) as a road underdog or pick over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 150 ppg scored. ARMY is 7-1 OVER when the total is 140 to 149.5 this season with a combined average of 157 ppg scored. CBB Road teams against the total (BUCKNELL) - excellent free throw shooting team (73% or better) against a good free throw shooting team (69-73%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 45-15 OVER L/5 seasons for a 75% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at 149.1 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
01-17-23 | UNLV v. Utah State -5.5 | 71-75 | Loss | -115 | 12 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned UNLV has struggled defensively in conference play so far, allowing 75,76,77, 84, and 82 points losing all 4 of 5 games so far, and now take on a home side Utah State that has scored at least 80 points in 10 of its 18 games, including a season-high 106 points against Westminster. Utah State is 31-9 under Odom when scoring at least 70 points and is a perfect 22-0 under Odom when scoring at least 80 points. My projections estimate a close to 80 point output by the Aggies and a DD win and cover. The L/3 meetings in this series have seen Utah State decisively win by scores of 90-75, 74-53, both at home and 83-74. Rinse and repeat on board for tonight. UTAH ST is 11-4 ATS as a favorite this season with the average ppg diff clicking in at +11.3 ppg. Utah state to cover |
|||||||
01-17-23 | Kent State v. Eastern Michigan +14.5 | 77-63 | Win | 100 | 11 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. In the last four games, the Eagles are averaging 20 trips to the free throw line and are converting at an 80.0 percent clip. For the year, EMU is hitting at 76.7 clip, which ranks second in the MAC and 14th nationally. The Eagles ability to get to the charity stripe Im betting gives us an edge on covering this number with the home dog.
CBB road team (KENT ST) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 9-36 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 80% conversion rate for bettors. |
|||||||
01-17-23 | Tennessee v. Mississippi State OVER 122.5 | 70-59 | Win | 100 | 11 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Tennessee is off a hard fought physical affair and upset 63-56 loss vs Kentucky last time out and will now be primed for a rebound and redemption minded effort . I know that Miss state will try to slow this game down to a grind, but the Vols will be hell bent on playing more aggressive and a more wide open style of hoops in transition, and Mississippi State will have to open up or be blown of the court. It must be noted Tennessee popped 87 points on the board at home in these teams first meeting this season. Barnes is 24-7 OVER in road games versus very good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 39% or better after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997 with a combined average of 148.1 ppg scored. TENNESSEE L/24 games after a combined score of 125 points or less over the last 3 seasons have seen a combined average score of 140.5 ppg scored. CBB home teams where the total is 129.5 or less (MISSISSIPPI ST) - poor shooting team (40-42.5%) against an excellent defensive team (40% or worse) after 15+ games are 43-12 OVER L/5 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors wtht a combined average of 134.5 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (TENNESSEE) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses are 31-8 OVER L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate with a combined average of 133.2 ppg scored. Play on the OVER |
|||||||
01-16-23 | Alabama State v. Alabama A&M OVER 140.5 | 69-61 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My rejections estimate a combined score of 144 or more giving us a full possession cushion this total with over position. CBB Road teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ALABAMA ST) - poor rebounding team (-3 to -6 Reb/G) vs. a horrible rebounding team (6 or less Reb/G) - 15+ games are 29-5 OVER L/26 seasons for a 85% conversion rate for bettors. Play OVER |
|||||||
01-16-23 | Purdue v. Michigan State +3.5 | 64-63 | Win | 100 | 5 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Michigan State lost to Purdue in the semifinals of the Big Ten tourney last season and Tom Izzo and company have this game circled on their calendar for a while now and will be primed for payback on their home court. Michigan State has won seven of its last eight games and enters the game on Monday with a 12-5 overall record, including a 4-2 mark in Big Ten play and will not easily fold here. PURDUE is 11-22 ATS versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. Play on Michigan State to cover |
|||||||
01-15-23 | Ohio State v. Rutgers -3 | 64-68 | Win | 100 | 7 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ohio State has lost 3 straight and playing in the difficult road environment Im betting will not see them stop the bleeding. After suffering a rare home loss to Iowa last time out Im expecting the Scarlet Knights to come out here with a top tier effort and get us the cover. RUTGERS is 11-0 ATS in home games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or more of their shots over the last 2 seasons. Play on Rutgers to cover |
|||||||
01-15-23 | St. John's +14.5 v. Connecticut | 85-74 | Win | 100 | 5 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Connecticut started strong this season with a 14-0 run but are just 4-3 in conference play . Meanwhile, St.Johns just ended a losing string with a win vs Butler last time out. Both sides need a win badly and Im betting that this will be a rock fight and hard fought battle. The Johnnies have had done well vs UConn lately cashing at a 6-0-1 ATS rate in their L/7 meetings and Im betting on a rinse repeat situation today.ST JOHNS is 9-2 ATSin road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or more of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.ST JOHNS is 6-0 ATS in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.CONNECTICUT is 3-14 ATS after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.Hurley is 5-16 ATS after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. Play on St.Johns to cover |
|||||||
01-15-23 | Marquette v. Xavier UNDER 164.5 | 76-80 | Win | 100 | 5 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My own projection makes this line closer to 160 giving us a two possession cushion on a under wager. Smart is 19-7 UNDER after 3 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997 with a combined average of 139 points per game going on the scoreboard. CBB Home teams where the total is greater than or equal to 160 (XAVIER) - explosive offensive team - scoring 84+ points/game on the season, after allowing 85 points or more are 29-5 UNDER L/5 seasons for 85% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-14-23 | Chattanooga +2.5 v. Samford | 74-75 | Win | 100 | 21 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (UT-CHATTANOOGA) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or more ) against a poor 3PT defense (36.5% or better ), after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 32-5 ATS L/23 seasons for a 86% conversion rate for bettors. Chattanooga to cover |
|||||||
01-14-23 | North Dakota +5.5 v. Denver | 71-78 | Loss | -110 | 18 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. DENVER is 0-6 ATS against conference opponents this season. CBB underdog (N DAKOTA) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (65-69%), cold shooting team - 4 straight games making 40% or less of their shots are 32-8 L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. N Dakota State to cover |
|||||||
01-14-23 | Holy Cross v. Lafayette UNDER 125.5 | 48-62 | Win | 100 | 16 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (HOLY CROSS/ LAFAYETTE) - in a game involving two poor rebounding teams (-3 to -6 reb/game) after 15+ games are 28-4 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 88% conversion rate with the average ppg output ringing in at 113.8 ppg. Play UNDER |
|||||||
01-14-23 | Maine +8.5 v. Maryland-Baltimore County | 77-85 | Win | 100 | 10 h 31 m | Show | |
01-14-23 | Kentucky +12 v. Tennessee | 63-56 | Win | 100 | 15 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Wildcats had a 28 game home win streak smashed by South Carolina recently and you can bet Calipari will be primed for a bounce back vs a top tier side ( Tennessee) here in his own diggs. Add to that revenge for last years tourney loss and Im betting we see the Wildcats make a game of this this. Calipari is 31-16 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% lor better ) after 15 or more games as the coach of KENTUCKY. CBB Underdogs of 10 to 19.5 points (KENTUCKY) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games are 26-5 ATS L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors. Kentucky to cover |
|||||||
01-13-23 | Nebraska +16 v. Purdue | 55-73 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Purdue beat Nebraska 65-62 on the road back on Dec 10th and now with revenge on board Im betting the Cornhuskers make a game of this. Just to much of a point swing here not to be on the take. NEBRASKA is 11-3 ATS revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 3 seasons. PURDUE is 3-11 ATS in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. PURDUE is 0-6 ATS in home games after playing a game as favorite this season CBB Underdogs of 10 or more points (NEBRASKA) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 60 points, with just one or fewer starters returning from last season are 65-32 L/5 seasons for a 67% conversion rate for bettors.( Blasted by Illinois last time out in a ugly effort- redemption time ) Play on Nebraska to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Arizona v. Oregon State +15.5 | 86-74 | Win | 100 | 16 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. OSU leads the Pac-12 in free throw percentage at 74.9 percent , key to backing this underdog vs a top tier side. Also Oregon State is shooting 45.4 percent from the floor at home this season, compared to 41.2 percent away from Gill Coliseum. OREGON ST is 14-1 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better) over the last 3 seasons. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (ARIZONA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or more ) playing a team with a losing record are 31-4 ATS L/5 seasons for a 89% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Oregon State to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Utah +12.5 v. UCLA | 49-68 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UCLA and Utah are the top 2 scoring defenses in the Pac-12. The Bruins are ranked No.21 nationally, allowing around 60.8 PPG, and the Runnin’ Utes come in at No 26, allowing 61.5 PPG. Utah is 6th in the country in rebounding, UCLA is 197, which Im betting will be a key advantage. Five returning starters for Utah make them very experienced under fire and they wont be flustered tonight at UCLA in game I have pegged to be much closer than the linesmakers line might indicate.
Play on Utah to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | New Mexico State +5 v. Seattle University | 66-69 | Win | 100 | 14 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. For years, WAC Championships have run through Las Cruces and there appeared to be a gulf between NM State and the rest of the league, however, this season it looks as though the rest of the league has finally caught up. But after a 0-4 league start you can bet that New Mexico state will be primed for a all out effort as a 0-5 start would be the worst in their history. NEW MEXICO ST is 11-2 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons. NEW MEXICO ST is 6-0 ATSin road games after a game where they made 78% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. CBB teams where the line is +3 to -3 (NEW MEXICO ST) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road wins are 48-17 L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors. Take the points with New Mexico state to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Northern Colorado v. CS Sacramento -4.5 | 64-72 | Win | 100 | 14 h 38 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (SACRAMENTO ST) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a bad team (20 to 40%) are 70-5 L/5 seasons for a 93% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at +11 ppg which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on Sacramento to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | St. Thomas v. UMKC OVER 135 | 60-81 | Win | 100 | 12 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Tauer is 8-1 OVER when the line is +3 to -3 as the coach of ST THOMAS (MN) with a combined average of 157.2 ppg scored. MISSOURI-KC is 6-0 OVER versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 161.7 ppg scored. MISSOURI-KC is 10-1 OVER versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 162.4 ppg scored. CBB Road teams where the total is between 130 and 139.5 points (ST THOMAS (MN)) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a conference rival, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a bad team (20% to 40%) are 31-7 OVER L/26 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 144.1 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Northern Kentucky v. Wisc-Milwaukee -1 | 75-80 | Win | 100 | 12 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Milwaukee has proven proficient at both ends of the floor and are playing with alot of confidence, N.Kentucky has their hands full tonight. N KENTUCKY is 0-8 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. KENTUCKY is 0-6 ATS in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WI-MILWAUKEE) - off 2 straight wins against conference rivals, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) are 83-33 L/26 seasons for a 72% conversion rate. Play on Wisconsin Milwaukee to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Tex A&M Commerce -4 v. Houston Christian | 59-68 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make Texas A&M Commerce at -7 favs thus we have value laying this number. HOUSTON CHRISTIAN is 1-7 ATS after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog this season. CBB Home underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (HOUSTON CHRISTIAN) - off 2 consecutive losses of 10 or more to conference rivals, a bad team (20% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record are 28-6 ATS L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate. Play Texas A&M Commerce to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Youngstown State v. Detroit +1.5 | 84-79 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (YOUNGSTOWN ST) - an explosive offensive team ( 76 or better PPG) against a good offensive team (74-76 PPG), after a combined score of 175 points or more are 24-4 L/5 seasons for a 86% conversion rate. Play on Detroit to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | California +12 v. Washington State | 51-66 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. California has played well of late garnering wins in 3 of their L/4, while Washington state is off a huge road win vs Arizona last time out and will be in. major emotional letdown situation tonight vs a side they could easily be over looking.Smith is 0-6 ATS when playing against a sub par team (Win Pct. 20% or less) as the coach of WASHINGTON ST.WASHINGTON ST is 0-7 ATS b in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 season. California to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | TCU v. Texas -5.5 | 75-79 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Texas has won seven of the last eight and 24 of the last 32 meetings against the Horned Frogs entering Wednesday's contest. The Longhorns have won 18 of the last 20 meetings in Austin against TCU. Rinse and repeat. Note: Revenge on board for Longhorns after suffering neutral court tourney loss to TCU last season. Play on Texas to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Tulane v. SMU +5 | 97-88 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Tulane lost both meetings to SMU last season and despite of having revenge on board just dont deserve to be 5 point road favs in a place the program has lost its last 12 visits dating back to 1997. SMU was clobbered in back to back games vs very strong competition Houston and UCF, but now this will seem like a walk in the park compared to that over whelming opp. Play on SMU to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Abilene Christian v. UT-Rio Grande Valley +6.5 | 86-103 | Win | 100 | 14 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UTRGV is 6-0 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons. Play on UTRGV to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Gardner-Webb v. Presbyterian OVER 125.5 | 79-78 | Win | 100 | 12 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Home teams where the total is 129.5 or less (PRESBYTERIAN) - poor shooting team (40-42.5%) against an excellent defensive team (40% or less) after 15+ games are 41-12 OVER L/5 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play on the OVER |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Monmouth +20.5 v. Hofstra | 57-77 | Win | 100 | 11 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Hofstra has won five in a row, with four of them decided by a combined 17 points, including a one and two-point game and Im betting Monmouth finds a way to cover here this evening at Hofstra. HOFSTRA is 1-9 ATS in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 45% or less over the last 3 seasons. HOFSTRA is 1-9 ATS in home games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. HOFSTRA is 0-6 ATS in home games off a win against a conference rival over the last 2 seasons. CBB Road underdogs of 10 or more points (MONMOUTH) - terrible shooting team (40% or less) against an average defensive team (42.5-45%), after a game where a team made 33% of their shots or worse are 31-7 ATS L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Monmouth to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Mississippi State -2 v. Georgia | 50-58 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Through 15 games, the Bulldogs are among the nation's best surrendering 56.7 points per game (2nd SEC o 5th nationally) on a 38.7 opponent field goal per-centage (3rd SEC o 21st nationally).The Bulldogs D, will be the difference maker tonight. Georgia's top scoring duo is Terry Roberts (15.7 PPG, 4.2 APG, 3.8 RPG, 1.9 SPG) and Kario Oquendo (14.1 PPG, 3.8 RPG) are going to have their flow interrupted by an aggressive visitor. CBB Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (MISSISSIPPI ST) - after being beaten by the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 80%) are 43-18 ATS L/26 seasons for a 71% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Miss state to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Fresno State +3.5 v. San Jose State | 64-74 | Loss | -115 | 13 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. FRESNO ST is 5-0 straight up against SAN JOSE ST over the last 3 seasons. Play on Fresno State to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | North Carolina v. Virginia -5 | 58-65 | Win | 100 | 26 h 15 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N.Carolina is over rated here vs a Virginia side with revenge on board from last years ugly tournament loss to the Tar Heels. NC is 0-9 ATS L/9 as visitors in this series. Virginia 8-1 ATS L/9 when seeking revenge vs N.Carolina. The Cavaliers returning 5 man corps Im betting will come out on fire tonight in a conclusive redemption win. Virginia to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Oklahoma +10 v. Kansas | 75-79 | Win | 100 | 14 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oklahoma dropped their first game last season 67-64 to Kansas as hosts and then dropped the second 2022 Big 12 meeting against Kansas 71-69 at Allen Fieldhouse last Jan and Im betting another hard fought affair here this season with taking points proving to be golden. OKLAHOMA is 22-11 ATS as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. KANSAS is 2-10 ATS versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing 12 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (KANSAS) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (80% ore more) playing a good team (60% to 80%) are 16-46 L/5 seasons for a go against 74% conversion rate. Play on Oklahoma to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Seton Hall v. Georgetown +9 | 66-51 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 18 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (SETON HALL) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games are 9-42 ATS L/26 seasons for a 83% conversion rate. Georgetown to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Toledo v. Kent State -3 | 63-75 | Win | 100 | 10 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Toledo has been lighting it up offensively of late and are off scoring 102 points last time out. After that giant output Im betting on immediate regression against a strong program( Kent State). TOLEDO is 3-15 ATS in road games after scoring 80 points or more 3 straight games. KENT ST is 11-1 ATS versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. KENT ST is 16-3 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. KENT ST is 8-1 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons Kent State cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Akron v. Bowling Green OVER 140.5 | 74-70 | Win | 100 | 4 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Bowling Green has scored 93, 102, 91, 88 points respectively in their L/4 trips to the hardwood, and Im betting they drag Akron into a run and gun affair here this evening. Akron has eclipsed the 80 point plateau in half of their L/8 games and can light it up offensively when pushed which will be the case tonight. BOWLING GREEN is 11-1 OVER L/12 after scoring 85 points or more 2 straight games with a combined average score of 155.7 ppg going on the board. BOWLING GREEN is 12-2 OVER b when the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons with a combined score of 155.5 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (BOWLING GREEN) - off an upset win over a conference rival as an underdog, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%) are 38-12 OVER L/26 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average score of 149.6 ppg going on the board. Play over |
|||||||
01-09-23 | Texas Southern v. Mississippi Valley State UNDER 133 | 67-71 | Loss | -105 | 12 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Texas Southern has averaged 62.3 ppg on offense on the road this season while their hosts Miss Valley State have averaged 54.6 ppg on offense overall.
Miss Valley State HC Ivory is 9-0 UNDER after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. CBB Road teams where the total is between 130 and 139.5 points (TEXAS SOUTHERN) - off an upset loss as a road favorite, a bad team (20% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record are 30-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 125.5 ppg going on the scoreboard. Play on the UNDER |
|||||||
01-09-23 | Florida A&M +15.5 v. Grambling State | 57-62 | Win | 100 | 11 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. McCullum is 9-1 ATS versus excellent teams - shooting 45% or better with a defense of 42% or less as the coach of FLORIDA A&M. McCullum is 15-3 ATS as a road underdog of 12.5 to 18 points as the coach of FLORIDA A&M. GRAMBLING is 1-11 ATSwhen playing against a struggling team (Win Pct. 20% or less) over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (GRAMBLING) - average offensive team (67-74 PPG) against a horrible offensive team (63 or less PPG), after scoring 75 points or more 2 straight games are 55-104 ATS L/26 seasons for a 66% go against conversion rate. Play on Florida A&M to cover |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Washington v. Arizona State OVER 136.5 | 65-73 | Win | 100 | 8 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. WASHINGTON is 6-0 OVER in a road game where the total is 135 to 139.5 over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 155.9 ppg scored. WASHINGTON is 7-0 OVER versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. with a combined average of 150.5 ppg scored. WASHINGTON in their L/6 road games versus very good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 39% or less over the last 2 seasons have seen a combined average of 141.6 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Washington +9.5 v. Arizona State | 65-73 | Win | 100 | 8 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Canisius v. St. Peter's -3 | 67-60 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. ST PETERS is 6-0 ATS as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points over the last 2 seasons. Favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ST PETERS) - a poor offensive team (63-67 PPG) against a poor defensive team (74-78 PPG), after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more are 54-5 L/26 seasons for a 92% conversion rare with the average ppg diff clicking in at +7.8 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on St.Peters to cover |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Mt. St. Mary's v. Marist OVER 126.5 | 56-63 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MARIST is 7-0 OVER at home when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 141.2 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (MARIST) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more, a bad team, winning 20% to 40% of their games on the season are 32-9 OVER L/26 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Ohio State -1.5 v. Maryland | 73-80 | Loss | -115 | 5 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ohio State comes into the game at 10-4 overall and 2-1 in conference play. The four losses have come at the hands of No. 17 San Diego State, No. 17 Duke, previously No. 1 North Carolina and No. 1 Purdue last time out. OHIO ST is 11-3 ATS after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. MARYLAND is 3-11 ATS in home games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The Buckeyes are No. 9 in the NET rankings and have the second-most efficient offense in the country and deserve respect here as short road favs. Play on Ohio State to cover |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Iowa v. Rutgers -6.5 | 76-65 | Loss | -105 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Things dont seem quite right from a chemistry perspective with Iowa basketball. I know they some how found a way to win vs Indiana last time out, in a controversial affair, but this team has issues and now in an emotional letdown spot today against a Rutgers side that plays their best hoops at home Im betting they the Hawkeyes are in trouble. Add in paayback for being eliminated opening round of the Big Ten tourney at the hands of Iowa we have a strong revenge scenario in play. IOWA is 1-8 ATS in road games vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 12+ points/game over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff registering at -8.8 . RUTGERS is 8-0 ATS in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +13.8. CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (RUTGERS) - an excellent defensive team (63 or less PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG), after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games are 51-20 ATS L/5 seasons for a 72% conversion rate. Play on Rutgers to cover |