Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
03-07-24 | Southern Utah v. Stephen F Austin -8.5 | Top | 60-87 | Win | 100 | 4 h 19 m | Show |
Southern Utah vs SF Austin State
7:30 EST 8-Unit best bet on Sf Austin -9 points and is valid to -10 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced impressive results going 32-5 SU and 18-8-2 ATS (69%) winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: « Bet on favorites between 3.5 and 9.5 points. « The favorite has scored 65 or fewer points in each of their last two games. « The dog has allowed 75 or more points in each of their last two games. « The game takes place after game number 25. |
|||||||
03-06-24 | Indiana +5.5 v. Minnesota | Top | 70-58 | Win | 100 | 6 h 10 m | Show |
Indiana vs Minnesota
9 ET | BTN | Williams Arena 8-Unit Bet on Indiana +5.5 points and is valid to 4.4 points. « From the predictive models we learn that Indiana is 15-4 SU and 14-2-3 ATS when they have scored 74 or more points and had 12 or fewer turnovers facing a conference foe on the road. « From the predictive model we learn that Minnesota is just 8-29 SU and 8-20-2 ATS in lined games when they have allowed 74 or more points and forced 12 or fewer turnovers hosting a conference opponent. « Indiana head coach Woodson is 8-1 ATS in road games after a game in which his team made 78% or more of their free attempts spanning the last three seasons. |
|||||||
03-05-24 | St. John's v. DePaul +19.5 | Top | 104-77 | Loss | -115 | 8 h 2 m | Show |
DePaul vs St. Johns 9 ET | FS1 8-Unit bet on DePaul +19.5 points and is valid to 16.5 points. The following NCAA Basketball betting system has earned a 31-3 SU and 21-12-1 ATS mark good for 64% winning bets since 2012. The requirements are: « Bet on underdogs priced at 11.5 or more points. « That dog has lost their last three games to conference foes. « The favorite is coming off an upset road win « The game number is from 25 on out to the end of the season. If the foe is playing on three or more days of rest (STJ is on 5 days of rest) our inflated underdogs have gone 25-12 ATS for 68% winning bets. |
|||||||
03-05-24 | North Florida v. Austin Peay UNDER 145 | Top | 98-101 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 2 m | Show |
North Florida vs Austin Peay 8 ET | ESPN+ | F&M Bank Arena 8-Unit bet on the Under 146 points and is valid down to 144.5 points. NFU is 27-14 Under in games with a total priced between 140 and 149.5 points spanning the past three seasons; 18-6 Under in road games where the total is priced between 140 and 149.5 points spanning the previous three seasons; 13-4 Under in road games following a game in which they made 13 or more 3-point shots in games played over the past three seasons. From the predictive model, NFU has seen the Under go 10-3 for 77% winning bets when allowing 75 or fewer points and getting between 34 and 39 rebounds in games played over the past 5 seasons. |
|||||||
03-05-24 | Bowling Green v. Western Michigan -1.5 | Top | 73-65 | Loss | -108 | 6 h 3 m | Show |
Bowling Green vs Western Michigan 7 ET | ESPN+ | University Arena (MI) 8-Unit bet on the WMU -1.5 points and is good a 2.5-point favorite. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 49-15 SU record and averaged a –162 wager earning a solid 35% ROI over the past seven seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on home teams priced between the 3’s. · The total is between 143 and 149.5 points/ · The home team has lost to the spread by 55 or more points spanning their previous 10 games. · The road team has seen their last five games play Over the total by 40 or more points. |
|||||||
03-05-24 | Purdue v. Illinois UNDER 164 | Top | 77-71 | Win | 100 | 6 h 1 m | Show |
Purdue vs Illinois 7:00 ET | Peacock | State Farm Center 8-Unit bet on the Under priced at 163.5 points and valid to 161.5 points The following NCAA Basketball betting system has earned 24-14 Under mark good for 64% winning bets since 2007. The requirements are: « Bet the Under when it is priced between 160 and 169.5 points. « The home and road teams are dominant rebounding teams out rebounding their foes by at least 6 boards per game. « The game occurs after game number 15 The following NCAA Basketball betting system has earned an 18-8 Under mark good for 70% winning bets since 2007. The requirements are: « Bet the Under in games with the total priced between 160 and 159.5 points. « One of the teams (Purdue) is on a three-game Over streak. « Both teams’ defenses allow between 67 and 74 PPG. « The game take place in the second half of the season after game number 15. |
|||||||
03-04-24 | Northern Colorado -3.5 v. Northern Arizona | Top | 82-74 | Win | 100 | 8 h 53 m | Show |
Northern Colorado vs Northern Arizona 8 ET | ESPN+ | J. Lawrence WalkupSkydome 8-Unit bet on Northern Colorado –3.5 points and is valid to –5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 42-8 SU and 37-13 ATS record good for 74% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on favorites that are coming off a win by three or fewer points. The dog has allowed 85 or more points in each of their last two games. |
|||||||
03-04-24 | Maryland-Eastern Shore v. Norfolk State -11.5 | Top | 50-69 | Win | 100 | 7 h 23 m | Show |
Maryland Eastern Shore vs Norfolk State 7:30 ET | 8-Unit bet on Norfolk State minus the 11.5 points and is valid to –13.5 points. I fully expect NFST’s head coach Robert Jones to be fully prepared to play a dominant game and earn their 20th win of the regular season. They sit atop the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference with a 9-3 record, but just one game ahead of the South Carolina State Bulldogs. So, a win keeps them in the bid for the top-seed in the Tournament too. The following NCAA Basketball betting system has earned a 31-3 SU and 21-12-1 ATS mark good for 64% winning bets since 2012. The requirements are: Bet on a team that has won 60% or more of their games. That team has lost eight or more of their last 9 games to the spread. That team is a double-digit favorite hosting a conference opponent. The total is priced between 130 and 139.5 points. |
|||||||
03-03-24 | Evansville +11 v. Belmont | Top | 66-83 | Loss | -107 | 5 h 38 m | Show |
Evansville vs Belmont 5 :00 PM ET | ESPN+ 8-Unit bet on Evansville +10.5 points and is valid to 10 points. The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 12-125 SU record and 85-52 ATS mark good for 62% winning bets since 2013. The requirements are: · Bet on underdogs priced between 10 and 19.5 points. · That road team has lost three consecutive games against conference foes. · The current opponent is coming off a road upset win. If the total is between 150 and 155 points, these road dogs have produced a 2-18 SU record and 13-7 ATS mark good for 65% winning bets. |
|||||||
03-03-24 | Michigan +12 v. Ohio State | Top | 61-84 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 38 m | Show |
Michigan vs Ohio State 4 ET | CBS | Value Center Arena 8-Unit bet on Michigan plus the 11.5 points and is valid to 10 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 168-105-6 ATS record good for 62% winning bets over the past 25 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on double-digit road underdogs. · That dog is coming off three consecutive games forcing no more than 11 turnovers in each game. · The host has gone five consecutive games forcing no more than 14 turnovers in each game. |
|||||||
03-03-24 | Siena +17.5 v. Quinnipiac | Top | 57-71 | Win | 100 | 2 h 39 m | Show |
Siena vs Quinnipiac 2 ET | 8-Unit bet on Siena +16.5 points and is valid to 14.5 points. The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 12-125 SU record and 85-52 ATS mark good for 62% winning bets since 2013. The requirements are: · Bet on underdogs priced between 10 and 19.5 points. · That road team has lost three consecutive games against conference foes. · The current opponent is coming off a road upset win.
|
|||||||
03-02-24 | Gonzaga v. St. Mary's -2 | Top | 70-57 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 53 m | Show |
Gonzaga vs St. Mary’s10 PM EST | University Credit Union Pavilion10-Unit bet on St. Mary’s -2.5 points and is valid to -3.5 points.
Consider betting 60% preflop on SMU and then look to add 20% more at pick-em and 20% more at +3.5 points during the first half of action. The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 17-6 SU record and a 15-8 ATS mark good for 65% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on home favorites. · The favorite is ranked higher in the latest AP poll than the foe. · The favorite won the first meeting of the season on the road by five or fewer points. The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 172-44 SU record and a 135-77 ATS mark good for 64% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on home favorites including pick-em. · The home favorite is a very strong defensive team allowing 63 or fewer points on the season. · The road team has won their last three games by double-digits. · The road team is averaging 76 or more PPG.
From my predictive models, SMU is 27-1 SU for 96% and 21-5-1 ATS for 81% winning bets over the past two seasons when scoring 74 or more points. 86% probability that SMU will score 74 or more points based on the predictive models’ projections. |
|||||||
03-02-24 | Pacific +10 v. San Diego | Top | 69-81 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 42 m | Show |
Pacific vs San Diego 10 ET | EDSPNM+ | Jenny Craig Pavilion 8-Unit bet on Pacific +9.5 points and is valid to 7.5 points. The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 66-543 SU record and a 359-222 ATS mark good for 62% winning bets over the past 25 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on Bet on road underdogs of 9 or more points. · Our road team has lost their last two games by double-digits to conference foes. · Our road team is avenging a same-season loss.
|
|||||||
03-02-24 | Penn State +6.5 v. Minnesota | Top | 70-75 | Win | 100 | 4 h 57 m | Show |
Penn State vs Minnesota 8-Unit bet on Penn State +6.5 points and is valid to 4.5 points. This line is more likely to increase ahead of the tip-off, so patience may be rewarded with a 7.5 or even 8.5 point betting line. Penn State is 20-10 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games have been played in each of the last two seasons; 19-8 ATS when facing good shooting teams making 45% or more of their shots after 15 or more games over the last three seasons; 27-13 ATS when facing a team that averages 14 or fewer forced turnovers per game after game number 15 of each of the past three seasons; 18-4-1 ATS after losing four or five of their previous six games spanning the last three seasons. Minnesota is just 4-24 SATS in home games following a game in which they allowed 55% or higher shooting. From the predictive models., we learn that PSU is 35-7 SU and 29-7-2 ATS good for 81% winning bets over the past five seasons when scoring 75 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers. |
|||||||
03-02-24 | Towson +4 v. NC-Wilmington | Top | 64-75 | Loss | -110 | 3 h 44 m | Show |
Towson State vs UNC-Wilmington2 ET | CBSSN8-Unit Bet on Towson State +3.5 points and is valid to +1.5 points.
The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 19-14 SU record and a 23-10 ATS mark good for 70% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on underdogs that won their previous game on the road by 15 or more points · The foe is coming off a game in which they scored 59 or fewer points in a home loss
|
|||||||
03-02-24 | North Carolina-Asheville v. Radford +1 | Top | 71-62 | Loss | -110 | 3 h 43 m | Show |
UNC-Ashville vs Radford2:00 PM EST | ESPN+8-Unit Bet on Radford using the money line if the4 spread has them priced as no more than a 2-point favorite. If the spread moves to -2.5 or greater favorite then bet the spread number.
The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 73-43 SU record and a 72-41-3 ATS mark good for 64% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on a team priced between a 3.5-point dog and a 3.5-point favorite. · That same team has led at the half by 7 or more points in each of their last three games. · That same team is facing a foe that scored 75 or more points in each of their last three games. |
|||||||
03-02-24 | Villanova +2.5 v. Providence | Top | 71-60 | Win | 100 | 1 h 42 m | Show |
Villanova vs Providence Noon Fox Amica Mutual Pavilion 8-Unit bet on Villanova +2.5 points and is valid if Nova remains the dog. The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 33-10 SU record and a 34-8-1 ATS mark good for 80%% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on teams priced between the three’s. · The game features two teams scoring between 67.5 and 74 PPG on the season. · The game occurs after the 15th game of the season. · Our team (Villanova) led by the half by 20 or more points at the half of their previous game. Villanova goes for the season sweep in a very difficult venue to play at in Providence. However, Nova is playing their best basketball of the season and certainly can win this game. From my predictive models, Villanova is 21-3 SU and 16-5-3 ATS since 2021 wqhen they have scored 77 or more points and committed 12 or fewer turnovers.
|
|||||||
03-01-24 | Harvard +2.5 v. Brown | Top | 68-71 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 19 m | Show |
Harvard vs Brown 7 ET 8-Unit bet on Harvard +2.5 points and is valid down to pick-em The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a highly profitable 55-72 SU record and a 86-39 ATS mark good for 69% winning bets over the past 25 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on road underdogs including pick-em. · That road team is avenging a same-season loss as a favorite to the host. · Host is coming off two wins by 5 or fewer points in each one, From my predictive models we learn that Cal Baptist is 15-0 SU and ATS when scoring 74 or more points, having fewer turnovers, and committing no more than 13 turnovers in games played since 2017. |
|||||||
02-29-24 | Stephen F Austin v. California Baptist -1 | Top | 62-60 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 14 m | Show |
SF Austin vs Cal Baptist 10 ET 8-Unit bet on Cal Baptist using the money line up to -135. If the money line is higher than -135 bet Cal Baptists using the spread. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a highly profitable 184-114 SU record good for 62% winning bets over the past 25 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on home teams that have lost to the spread by 42 or more points over their previous seven games. · Facing a foe that has seen their last seven games play Under the total by 42 or more points. · The home team is favored by not more than 4 points and includes Pick-em. From my predictive models we learn that Cal Baptist is 15-0 SU and ATS when scoring 74 or more points, having fewer turnovers, and committing no more than 13 turnovers in games played since 2017. Last day to get March Madness Subscription at 50% off the regular price. Do not miss out getting on board our 4th-rtanked college basketball capper today.
|
|||||||
02-29-24 | Michigan +8 v. Rutgers | Top | 52-82 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 44 m | Show |
Michigan vs Rutgers From my predictive models we learn that Michigan is 20-5 SU and 19-4-1 ATS when scoring 70 or more points and committing no more than 12 turnovers in games played since 2017. My model calls for an 84% probability that Michigan will meet or exceed these measures, which also implies a 16% chance they will not. Last day to get March Madness Subscription at 50% off the regular price. Do not miss out getting on board our 4th-rtanked college basketball capper today. |
|||||||
02-28-24 | California +13.5 v. Colorado | Top | 78-88 | Win | 100 | 3 h 18 m | Show |
Cal vs Colorado 8 ET 8-Unit bet on Cal plus the 13.5 points and is valid down to 11.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a highly profitable 144-78-4 ATS record good for 65% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on road underdogs priced between 11.5 and 17 points. · Conference matchup. · After game number 15 · The total is 140 or more points. · The dog has forced 13 or fewer turnovers in five consecutive games. · The foe has forced 10 or fewer turnovers in each of their last three games. |
|||||||
02-27-24 | Northern Illinois +15 v. Toledo | Top | 75-72 | Win | 100 | 6 h 36 m | Show |
Northern Illinois vs Toledo 8-Unit bet on Northern Illinois (NIU) +15 points and is valid if they remain a double-digit underdog, which obviously they will. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a highly profitable 144-78-4 ATS record good for 65% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on road underdogs between 10 and 19.5 points. · Our road team is avenging a same-season double-digit loss. · Our road team is coming off a double digit loss to a conference rival. |
|||||||
02-26-24 | Texas A&M Corpus Christi v. Houston Christian +13 | Top | 91-79 | Win | 100 | 7 h 33 m | Show |
Texas A&M Corpus Christie vs Houston Christian The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a highly profitable 83-51 ATS for 62% winning bets since 2013. The requirements are: · Bet on underdogs between 10 and 19.5 points. · That dog has lost three consecutive games to conference foes. · The foe is coming off an upset road win. If the opponent is playing on one day of rest exact their record soars to 15-4 ATS for 79% winning bets. |
|||||||
02-25-24 | Minnesota v. Nebraska -6.5 | Top | 55-73 | Win | 100 | 9 h 20 m | Show |
Minnesota vs Nebraska 6:30 ET | BTN 8-Unit Bet on Nebraska -6.5 points and is valid to -7.5 points. The following NCAAB algorithm has earned a 80-18 SU and 65-33 ATS record for 66.3% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on home favorites including pick-em. · Home team led at the half of their previous game by 5 or more points. · The Visitor has scored 75 or more points in each of their three previous games. |
|||||||
02-25-24 | Iona v. Mt. St. Mary's UNDER 145.5 | Top | 65-72 | Win | 100 | 5 h 50 m | Show |
Iona vs Mount St. Mary’s 2:00 ET | ESPN+ 8-Unit Bet on the Under priced at 145.5 points and is valid to 143.5 points. The following NCAAB algorithm has earned a n 85-53 record good for 62% over the past five seasons. The requirements are: · Bet the under when priced between 143 and 152 points. · The home team has lost the spread by 52 or more points spanning their previous 10 games. · The visitor has seen their last five games play Over the total by 30 or more points. |
|||||||
02-24-24 | Loyola Marymount v. Pacific +8.5 | Top | 86-63 | Loss | -105 | 11 h 21 m | Show |
Loyola-Marymount vs Pacific 10 ET | ESPN+ | Alex G Spanos Center 8-Unit Bet on Pacific +7 points and is valid to 6 points The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 90-42 Under for 69% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on underdogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. · The dog has lost three straight games to conference foes. · The opponent is coming off a terrible road loss in which they scored fewer than 60 points. Loyola is 3-12 ATS in road games with a total priced between 140 and 149.5 points; 1-10 ATS after four consecutive games getting outrebounded by 6 or more boards. |
|||||||
02-24-24 | Villanova +12 v. Connecticut | Top | 54-78 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 32 m | Show |
Villanova vs UCONN 8 PM EST | FOX | Gampel Pavillion 10-UNIT Bet on the Villanova Wildcats plus 11.5 points and is valid to 10-points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 4-38 SU and 30-9-3 ATS for 77% winning bets over the past 20 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on double-digit underdogs. · The dog has seen their last seven games play Under the total by 42 or more points. · The favorite was defeated by 18 or more points to the spread in their previous game. Nova is 7-1 ATS when facing a team that is shooting 45% or higher in games played this season. Nova has done well in the month of February and has generated a ton of momentum heading in to the Conference and NCAA Tournaments. Head coach Neptune is 17-5 ATS in February games and 34-17-1 ATS when playing their second game spanning a week. From the predictive model we are looking for Nova to make 10 or more 3-pointers, commit 12 or fewer turnovers and make 85% of their free throws. In past games in which they met these performance hurdles has seen them produce an exceptional 31-5 SU record and 23-9 ATS mark good for 72% winning bets. |
|||||||
02-24-24 | Georgetown v. DePaul UNDER 150.5 | Top | 77-76 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 20 m | Show |
Georgetown vs DePaul 8-Unit Bet on the Under priced at 150 points and is valid to 148.5 points The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 90-42 Under for 69% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet the Under in a game priced between 145 and 150 points. · The home team has lost to the spread by 50 or more points spanning their last 10 games. · The opponent has seen their last five games play Over the total by 35 or more points. Georgetown is 18-7 Under when facing a team that is allowing 45% shooting in games played in the second half spanning the past 10 seasons. DePaul is 29-12-1 Under after having three consecutive games in which they forced 11 or fewer turnovers in each game. |
|||||||
02-24-24 | North Carolina -2.5 v. Virginia | Top | 54-44 | Win | 100 | 5 h 22 m | Show |
(10) North Carolina vs Virginia 8-Unit bet on UNC -2.5 points and is valid to -3.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 59-15 SU and 46-26-2 ATS for 64% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on road favorites. · The game is a conference matchup. · The road team covered the spread as a double-digit favorite in their previous game. · The road team is playing on 5 or 6 days of rest. The No. 10 North Carolina Tar Heels (20-6, 12-3 ACC) will face the Virginia Cavaliers (20-7, 11-5 ACC) in a crucial ACC showdown on Saturday, February 24th at 4 p.m. ET at John Paul Jones Arena in Charlottesville. The game will be televised on ESPN and streamed on fuboTV1. Both teams are coming off losses in their previous games. North Carolina fell to Syracuse 81-75 on the road, snapping a four-game winning streak. Virginia suffered a humiliating 75-41 defeat at the hands of rival Virginia Tech, their worst loss in the Tony Bennett era. The Tar Heels and the Cavaliers have contrasting styles of play. North Carolina is one of the most explosive offensive teams in the country, averaging 82.8 points per game, second in the ACC and 14th in the nation. They also lead the nation in rebounding margin (+11.5) and offensive rebounding percentage (40.8%). Virginia is known for its stifling defense, holding opponents to 59.8 points per game, first in the ACC and fifth in the nation. They also rank first in the nation in turnover percentage (12.9%) and second in three-point percentage (40.7%). The key players to watch for North Carolina are senior guard RJ Davis, who leads the team in scoring (21.3 ppg) and assists (3.6 apg), and senior forward Armando Bacot, who averages a double-double of 14.6 points and 10.3 rebounds per game. For Virginia, senior guard Reece Beekman is the team’s top scorer (13.9 ppg) and playmaker (5.8 apg), while senior forward Jay Huff is a dominant presence in the paint, averaging 12.8 points, 7.1 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. The all-time series between the two teams is heavily in favor of North Carolina, who leads 134-62. However, Virginia has won eight of the last 10 meetings, including a 68-58 victory in the quarterfinals of the ACC Tournament last season. The Cavaliers have also won eight straight home games against the Tar Heels, dating back to 2012. |
|||||||
02-24-24 | Stephen F Austin +4 v. Utah Valley | Top | 62-71 | Loss | -108 | 5 h 21 m | Show |
SF Austin State vs Utah Valley State 8-Unit Bet on SF Austin +4.5 points and is valid if they remain the underdog. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 59-15 SU and 46-26-2 ATS for 64% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on road favorites. · The game is a conference matchup. · The road team covered the spread as a double-digit favorite in their previous game. · The road team is playing on 5 or 6 days of rest. Road underdogs that have lost 10 or more games against the spread are 7-4 ATS for 64% winning bets. |
|||||||
02-23-24 | Fairfield v. Quinnipiac -3 | Top | 85-81 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 42 m | Show |
Quinnipiac vs. Fairfield 8-Unit bet on Quinnipiac -3 points and is valid to -4 points. On Friday, February 23, 2024, the Quinnipiac Bobcats (19-6, 11-3 MAAC) will host the Fairfield Stags (16-10, 10-5 MAAC) in a Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference (MAAC) clash at M&T Bank Arena in Hamden, Connecticut. Let’s dive into the details: Team Notes:· Fairfield Stags (16-10, 10-5 MAAC): The Stags are coming off a 94-80 victory over Mount Saint Mary’s, with Caleb Fields leading the way with 26 points.Fairfield has won four of its last five games.On offense, the Stags are scoring an average of 76.3 points per game (ranked 108th nationally).Their shooting percentages are 45.3% overall and 37.4% from beyond the arc.Caleb Fields is the top scorer, averaging 16.0 points per game, followed closely by Jalen Leach with 15.8 points per game.Jasper Floyd facilitates the offense with an average of 4.6 assists per game.Defensively, Fairfield allows an average of 71.3 points per game (ranked 164th).Peyton Smith protects the rim with an average of 0.8 blocked shots per game.· Quinnipiac Bobcats (19-6, 11-3 MAAC): Despite losing their last two games, the Bobcats maintain a 1 ½-game lead atop the MAAC standings over Fairfield and Niagara.Quinnipiac was defeated by Niagara 80-66 in their most recent outing.Offensively, the Bobcats score an average of 78.3 points per game (ranked 68th nationally).Their shooting percentages are 44.6% overall and 34.6% from three-point range.Free throw shooting is a strength for Quinnipiac, ranking 13th nationally at 78%.The game pace for Quinnipiac is relatively high, contributing to their offensive output.Basket Assisted Points per Game:Quinnipiac relies on ball movement and teamwork to create scoring opportunities.Their style of play emphasizes assisted baskets rather than individual heroics.Look for players like Jalen Pickett and Seth Pinkney to facilitate ball movement and find open teammates.Prediction:My predictive model is expecting Quinnipiac to score 77 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers. In past games played over the past five seasons, Quinnipiac is 23-2 SU and 15-3-1 ATS for 83% winning bets when meeting these performance measures. Fairfield is 2-14 SU and 4-1 ATS when allowing 77 or more points and have the same or more turnovers in games played over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
02-23-24 | Iona v. Rider -1.5 | Top | 75-78 | Win | 100 | 3 h 40 m | Show |
Iona vs Rider 7:00 Est | ESPN+ | Alumni Gymnasium 8-Unit bet on Rider -1.5 points and is valid to -3.5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 31-10 SU record and 31-10 ATS good for 76% winning bets over the past five seasons The requirements are: · Bet on any team priced between the 3’s. · Both teams average 67 to 74.5 PPG on the season. · The game takes place after the 15th one. · That team is coming off a game in which they led at the half by 20+ points. |
|||||||
02-22-24 | Elon +10 v. Northeastern | Top | 58-61 | Win | 100 | 3 h 38 m | Show |
Elon vs Northeastern 7 ET | Matthews Arena, Boston 8-Unit bet on Elon+9.5 points and is valid to 8.5 points The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a highly profitable 17-20 SU record and a 28-9 ATS record for 76% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: § Bet on dogs priced between a 3.5 and 9.5 point dog. § That dog is avenging a same season loss. § That Dog is coming off an upset win where they were priced as a 12.5 point or greater dog.
|
|||||||
02-21-24 | Navy -1.5 v. Loyola Maryland | Top | 69-62 | Win | 100 | 5 h 31 m | Show |
Navy vs Loyola-Maryland 7 EST Navy has lost their last 8 games and is on a remarkable 0-10-1 ATS losing streak, but according to the predictive models, this will change tonight. Loyola split their road trip to the Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton area in PA (ABE) defeating and covering against Lafayette and losing, but covering against Lehigh. Navy skipper DeChellis is a solid 48-21 ATS following four straight games committing no more than 14 turnovers in each game; 18-6 ATS after five such games. From the predictive models we are expecting a slow pace to this game with neither team attempting more than 55 shots and with Loyola committing three or more turnovers than Navy. In past games matching these measures, Navy has gone 15-3 SUATS. Bet Navy. |
|||||||
02-19-24 | Iowa State v. Houston -9 | Top | 65-73 | Loss | -109 | 7 h 58 m | Show |
(10) Iowa State vs (1) Houston 9 ET | ESPN | Fertitta Center 10-Unit Bet on Houston minus the 9 points and is valid to 10.5 points.
Remember, these 10-UNIT MAX plays win at 67% ATS of the time, but that also means they lose 33% of the time. I am a 100% no hype person when it comes to trading the financial markets and sports betting opportunities. Yes, no doubt, I am quite confident when these plays are identified with my pre3dictive models, but please do yourself a favor and remind yourself there are NO LOCKS and I do not possess psychic powers or even a crystal ball (smile). Bet smartly always whether a 10-UNIT or an 8-Unit or even a 5-Unit best bet. Currently 77% of the handle is on ISU and this may be enough pressure to move the line down throughout the afternoon ahead of the 9 PM ET tipoff. The price as a dog is deflated on ISU meaning the models see this line fairly priced at -13.5 points. So, anything south of 9.5 points is a great betting opportunity. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 81-47-2 ATS record good for 63% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: ü Bet on any team ü Facing a foe that has covered five or more consecutive games ATS. ü That foe has won 80% or more of their games on the season. If the team is playing at home and facing a conference foe, their record soars to 23-15 SU and 29-8-1 ATS for 78% winning bets over the past five seasons. Drilling down a bit farther, if our home team is favored, they are a perfect 11-0 SU and 10-1 ATS for 91% winning bets over the past five seasons. The No. 10 Iowa State Cyclones (20-5, 9-3 Big 12) will face the No. 3 Houston Cougars (22-3, 9-3 Big 12) on Monday night at Fertitta Center in a battle for the top spot in the conference. Both teams are coming off impressive wins over ranked opponents on Saturday and have split their two previous meetings this season. Iowa State: Seeking More than Just the Big-12 Championship The Cyclones have won seven of their last eight games and have covered the spread in five straight, including an 82-74 victory over No. 15 Texas Tech on Saturday. Iowa State is led by freshman guard Tamin Lipsey, who averages 13.2 points, 5.5 assists, and 2.9 steals per game. Lipsey is shooting 43.6 percent from the field and 36.3 percent from beyond the arc. He scored 18 points and dished out seven assists in the win over the Red Raiders. Iowa State also has a balanced scoring attack, with four other players averaging double figures. Sophomore guard Keshon Gilbert is second on the team with 14.2 points per game, followed by senior forward Curtis Jones (10.1), freshman forward Milan Momcilovic (12.0), and junior center Robert Jones (8.6). The Cyclones are a potent offensive team, averaging 78.7 points per game on 47.6 percent shooting, including 35.3 percent from three-point range. They also rank 24th in the nation in assists per game (16.5) and third in steals per game (10.7). On the defensive end, Iowa State is one of the best teams in the country, allowing only 62.5 points per game on 40.5 percent shooting. The Cyclones are especially effective at forcing turnovers, as they rank second in the nation in turnover margin (+6.3) and third in turnover percentage (25.4). Iowa State also has a solid rebounding margin (+2.9) and blocks per game (3.0). Houston: Dominant on both ends of the floor The Cougars have won three straight games, including an 82-61 rout of No. 9 Texas on Saturday. Houston is led by senior guard Jamal Shead, who averages 12.8 points, 5.8 assists, and 2.3 steals per game. Shead is shooting 44.1 percent from the field and 34.1 percent from three-point range. He had 16 points, six assists, and four steals in the win over the Longhorns. Houston also has a deep and talented roster, with four other players averaging at least 9.1 points per game. Senior guard LJ Cryer leads the team with 15.3 points per game, followed by senior forward J’wan Roberts (9.1), sophomore guard Emanuel Sharp (12.3), and junior center Ja’Vier Francis (6.0). The Cougars are a solid offensive team, averaging 73.9 points per game on 43.4 percent shooting, including 34.6 percent from three-point range. They also rank fifth-best in the nation in turnovers per game (8.7) and 13th in offensive rebounds per game (14.9). However, Houston’s main strength is its defense, which ranks first in the nation in points allowed per game (55.0), field goal percentage defense (37.2), and defensive efficiency (86.3). The Cougars are also among the best in the country in three-point percentage defense (28.8), rebounding margin (+8.2), steals per game (10.0), and blocks per game (5.0). Houston has held 19 of its 25 opponents to 60 or fewer points, and has not allowed more than 70 points in any game this season. They Houston defense has held 14 opponents to season scoring lows so far in 2023. Iowa State is one of those 14 teams, who defeated the Cougars 57-53. I see the Cougars reestablishing the ISU scoring low tonight. The Cougars will look to extend their home dominance and sweep the season series against Iowa State on Monday. Houston has not lost at Fertitta Center since Feb. 22, 2023, when it fell to Cincinnati 69-68. The Cougars have won by an average of 19.6 points per game at home this season, and have held their opponents to 51.1 points per game on 35.2 percent shooting. Houston will need to continue its defensive excellence and exploit Iowa State’s weaknesses on the boards and at the free-throw line. |
|||||||
02-18-24 | Rutgers +4.5 v. Minnesota | Top | 70-81 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 24 m | Show |
Rutgers vs Minnesota 6:30 ET | Big Ten network | Williams Arena The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 163-68 SU record and 138-64 ATS record good for 62% winning bets since 1996. The requirements are: ü Bet on road team. ü That road team is coming off a win but failed to cover the spread. ü The home team is coming off a conference loss allowing 80 or more points. |
|||||||
02-18-24 | Niagara v. Quinnipiac -5.5 | Top | 80-66 | Loss | -110 | 3 h 52 m | Show |
Niagara vs Quinnipiac 8-Unit Bet on Quinnipiac minus the 6 points and is valid to 7.5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 26-15 SU record and 31-8 ATS record good for 80% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: ü Bet on teams with 7 or more days of rest. ü That team is coming off a horrid loss by 15 or more3 points and was priced as the favorite. From the predictive models, we are looking for Quinnipiac to score 80 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers. In past games when they have met these performance measures has led them to a 17-1 SU record and 15-2-1 ATS mark good for 89% winning bets since 2019. |
|||||||
02-18-24 | Purdue v. Ohio State UNDER 147 | Top | 69-73 | Win | 100 | 2 h 53 m | Show |
Purdue vs Ohio State 1 ET | CBS | Value City Arena 8-Unit Best Bet on the Under currently priced at 145.5 points and is valid down to 142.5 points. This game is expected to feature scoring runs by both teams and there will be intervals where the teams are combining to score 5 or more points per minute spanning three minutes. Consider betting 70% Under preflop and then look to add 15% at 149.5 points and 15% more at 153.5 points during the first half of action. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 26-21 SU record and 24-23 ATS record and 31-16 Under good for 66% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: ü Bet the under with a price between 143 and 152. ü The home team has failed to cover the spread by 55 to 65 points over their previous 10 games. ü The visitor has seen their last five games play Over by 35 or more points. If the game occurs after the 15th of the season, the Under has produced a 28-11 record good for 72% winning bets since 2006. |
|||||||
02-17-24 | Portland +6 v. Pepperdine | Top | 70-91 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 50 m | Show |
Portland vs Pepperdine 10:00 ET | ESPN+ 8-Unit bet on Portland +5.5 points and valid down to 4.5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 35-61 SU record and 63-32-1 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: ü Bet on Underdogs between 3.5 and 9.5 points. ü The dog has lost three straight games to conference foes. ü The dog is coming off a horrid road loss in which they scored 60 or fewer points. Game Notes: The Portland Pilots are heading to the Firestone Fieldhouse on Saturday night to face off against the Pepperdine Waves in West Coast Conference action. Here’s a preview of the game: Portland Pilots (9-18, 3-9 WCC):The Pilots are on a three-game losing streak after a 71-66 road loss against the San Diego Toreros.Freshman guard Tyler Harris played well in their last game, recording 19 points, 10 rebounds, and contributing defensively.The Pilots’ defense has struggled throughout the year, giving up an average of 80.3 points per game, but Harris’ defensive presence will be a positive factor for them in this gameInjury Report:Guard Vincent Delano: Redshirt (OUT)Guard Jude Harris: Redshirt (OUT)Forward Cyprian Hyde: Redshirt (OUT)Forward Alimamy Koroma: Undisclosed (OUT)Pepperdine Waves (10-17, 3-9):The Waves are coming off a brutal 103-59 road loss against the Saint Mary’s Gaels.Sophomore forward Jevon Porter stepped up in their last game, posting 13 points and contributing defensively. |
|||||||
02-17-24 | LSU +7.5 v. South Carolina | Top | 64-63 | Win | 100 | 3 h 20 m | Show |
LSU vs South Carolina 3:30 ET | SECN The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 11-11 SU record and 18-4 ATS record good for 82% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: ü Bet on Underdogs after game number 15. ü The matchup is two teams shooting 32 to 36.5% form beyond the arc. ü The favorite is coming off a game shooting 38% or worse and allowing at least 60% shooting in their previous game. The No. 11 South Carolina Gamecocks (21-4, 9-3 SEC) will host the LSU Tigers (12-12, 4-7 SEC) in a conference matchup at Colonial Life Arena in Columbia. The game will tip off at 3:30 PM ET and will be broadcasted on SEC Network1. South Carolina is coming off a blowout loss at Auburn, where they scored only 61 points and allowed 101. The Gamecocks will look to bounce back and extend their four-game home winning streak. South Carolina is led by junior guard Meechie Johnson Jr., who averages 14.4 points per game and shoots 33.6% from three-point range. The Gamecocks also have a balanced scoring attack, with four other players averaging at least nine points per game. South Carolina ranks 35th in the nation in points allowed per game (65.4) and 63rd in assists per game (15.2). LSU has lost three straight games and five of their last six, falling to the bottom of the SEC standings. The Tigers have struggled defensively, giving up 74.8 points per game, which ranks 265th in the country. LSU also has a negative turnover margin, averaging 12.8 turnovers per game while forcing only 11.6. The Tigers are led by senior guard Jordan Wright, who averages 15 points per game and 1.8 steals per game. Wright is also a threat from beyond the arc, shooting 33.9% from three-point range. LSU also has a talented big man in sophomore center Will Baker, who averages 12.6 points per game and 53.9% from the field. This game could have implications for the SEC tournament seeding, as South Carolina is currently tied for second place in the conference, while LSU is in 12th place. Both teams will try to end their losing streaks and gain some momentum heading into the final stretch of the regular season. |
|||||||
02-17-24 | Samford v. Mercer +10.5 | Top | 84-88 | Win | 100 | 2 h 50 m | Show |
Samford vs Mercer 2 ET | 8-Unit Bet on Mercer +10 points and is good to 9.5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 38-119 SU record and 85-55-3 ATS record good for 61% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: ü Bet on losing record home teams ü The visitor has seen their last five games play Under the posted total by a combined 30 or more points. ü The visitor has 80% or more of their games on the season. If the game occurs after game number 20 of the season, our home teams have gone 16-64 SU and 49-27-1 ATS for 65% winning bets. If our team is priced as a double-digit dog has improved their record to 6-32 SU and 25-12-1 ATS for 68% winning bets since 2006. |
|||||||
02-16-24 | Brown +13.5 v. Princeton | Top | 63-72 | Win | 100 | 4 h 3 m | Show |
Brown vs Princeton 7:00 ET | ESPN+ | Jadwin Gymnasium The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a SU record and 118-86-3 ATS record good for 58% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: ü Bet on road dogs priced between 11.5 and 17 points. ü The game takes place after game number 15 and is a conference showdown. ü The total is 140 or more points. ü Our road team has forced |
|||||||
02-15-24 | Utah Valley v. California Baptist -2.5 | Top | 69-46 | Loss | -105 | 7 h 11 m | Show |
Utah Valley State vs Cal Baptist 10:00 ET | 8-Unit bet on Cal Baptist -3.5 points and is valid to -4.5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 112-31 SU record and 89-54 ATS record good for 62% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: ü Bet on favorites between 2.5 and 9.5 points. ü The favorite is coming off an upset road loss. ü The underdog is coming off a huge home win by 20 or more points. If the game is after game number 15 of the regular season, these favorites have gone 70-11 SU and 55-26 ATS for 68% winning bets. If the line drops below -2.5 it remains a valid bet since my predictive models have them on the radar if they do not become a favorite. |
|||||||
02-15-24 | Pacific +16.5 v. Santa Clara | Top | 53-79 | Loss | -115 | 7 h 10 m | Show |
Pacific vs Santa Clara 10:00 ET | 8-Unit bet on Pacific +17 points and is valid to 14.5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 15-116 SU record and 83-46-2 ATS record good for 64% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: ü Bet on road underdogs between 10 and 19.5 points. ü The road team is avenging a same season double-digit loss at home. ü That road dog is coming off three consecutive losses to conference foes. |
|||||||
02-15-24 | Gonzaga v. Loyola Marymount +16 | Top | 91-74 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 12 m | Show |
Gonzaga vs Loyola Marymount Gersten Pavillion | 9:00 ET | CBSSN The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 13-194 SU record and 118-86-3 ATS record good for 58% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: ü Bet on underdogs between 10 and 19.5 points. ü That underdog has lost their last three games all to conference foes. ü The favorite is coming off an upset road win. If the host has won 33 to 45% of their games, their record improves to 29-17-1 ATS for 63% winning bets since 2006. The Gonzaga Bulldogs (18-6, 8-2 WCC) will look to extend their four-game road winning streak when they face the Loyola Marymount Lions (10-14, 3-7 WCC) on Thursday, February 15, 2024, at the Gersten Pavilion in Los Angeles. The game will be televised on CBS Sports Network at 9:00 PM ET. The Bulldogs are coming off an impressive 89-85 victory over the Kentucky Wildcats on Saturday, where they overcame a 15-point deficit in the second half. Anton Watson led the way with 23 points and 10 rebounds, while Graham Ike added 21 points and nine boards. Ryan Nembhard and Nolan Hickman also scored in double figures, with 16 and 14 points respectively. Gonzaga shot 51.6% from the field and 40.0% from the three-point line, while holding Kentucky to 42.9% and 31.6%. The Lions have lost four straight games, including a 77-64 defeat to the San Francisco Dons on Saturday. Alex Merkviladze was the only Lion to score in double digits, with 16 points and six rebounds. Dominick Harris, Justin Wright, and Will Johnston combined for 27 points, but shot just 9-of-28 from the field. Keli Leaupepe, who averages 9.9 points per game, was held to just four points on 2-of-9 shooting. Loyola Marymount shot 38.5% from the field and 26.1% from the three-point line, while allowing San Francisco to shoot 50.0% and 40.0%. Gonzaga has dominated the series against Loyola Marymount, winning 24 of the last 25 meetings. The last time the Lions beat the Bulldogs was on February 18, 2010, when they pulled off a 74-66 upset at home. The Bulldogs have won the last 12 games at the Gersten Pavilion by an average margin of 19.8 points. The last time the Lions came within single digits of the Bulldogs at home was on January 31, 2015, when they lost 72-55. Nevermind the history lesson as this is simply too many points to give the Lions and the projections from my predictive models show a reasonable probability that they can keep the final deficit to 10 or fewer points. |
|||||||
02-15-24 | Minnesota v. Purdue -16.5 | Top | 76-84 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 41 m | Show |
Minnesota vs Purdue 8:30 ET | 8-Unit bet on Purdue -16.5 points and is valid to -17.5 points.
The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 112-31 SU record and 89-54 ATS record good for 62% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: ü Bet on home favorites including pick-em. ü The favorite has scored 75 or more points in three consecutive games. ü The underdog is coming off a huge offensive game scoring 85 or more points. If the game is after game number 15 of the regular season, these favorites have gone 70-11 SU and 55-26 ATS for 68% winning bets. If the line drops below -2.5 it remains a valid bet since my predictive models have them on the radar if they do not become a favorite. From the predictive model, Purdue is 83-3 SU and 40-13-1 ATS for 76% winning bets when scoring 80 or more points and committing the same or fewer turnovers than their foe in home games. |
|||||||
02-15-24 | Seattle University -3.5 v. Southern Utah | Top | 78-68 | Win | 100 | 6 h 40 m | Show |
Seattle vs Southern Utah 8:30 ET | 8-Unit bet on Seattle -4 points and is valid to -5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 45-8 SU record and 39-13-1 ATS record good for 75% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: ü Bet on favorites between 3.5 and 9.5 points. ü The favorite is allowing 67 to 74 points per game. ü The game occurs after the 15th game of the season. ü The favorite is coming off game in which they allowed 45 or more points in the first half. ü The dog is scoring between 74 and 78 points per game. |
|||||||
02-14-24 | Western Carolina +7.5 v. Samford | Top | 62-88 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 21 m | Show |
Western Carolina vs Samford 8-Unit bet on Western Carolina +7.5 points and is valid to 6.5 points. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 21-29 SU and 35-15 ATS (70%) record since 2019. The requirements are: ü Bet on road underdogs including pick-em. ü The road team has committed 11 or fewer turnovers in each of their last four games. ü The host is coming off a game committing 8 or fewer turnovers. ü The host is coming off a double-digit SUATS win. From the predictive model we learn that WCU is 24-17 SU and 28-7-1 ATS for 80% winning bets in road games in which they scored 75 or more points and had the same or fewer turnovers in games played over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
02-14-24 | Oakland +1.5 v. IUPU Ft Wayne | Top | 71-63 | Win | 100 | 3 h 22 m | Show |
Oakland vs Purdue Fort Wayne 7 ET | ESPN+ |Allen County War Memorial Coliseum 8-Unit bet on Oakland using the money line if the spread is priced between -1.5 and +1.5. If Oakland is priced as a 2 or more-point favorite or dog then use that line instead of the money line. Oakland is likely to remain the underdog in this matchup. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 52-26 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: ü Bet on road underdogs including pick-em. ü The road team held their previous opponent to 35% or worse shooting. ü The host has shot 50% or higher from the field in each of their last three games. From my predictive models, we learn that Oakland is 40-9 SU and 34-10-1 ATS for 77% winning bets when they have scored 75 or more points and had 15 or fewer turnnovers in games played over the past five seasons.
|
|||||||
02-13-24 | Michigan +16.5 v. Illinois | Top | 68-97 | Loss | -115 | 6 h 50 m | Show |
Michigan vs Illinois 7 ET | Peacock | State Farm Center 8-Unit Bet on Michigan plus the 15.5 points and is valid to 13.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 5-38 SU record and 30-13 ATS record for 70% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: ü Bet on road dogs priced between 11.5 and 17 points. ü The game takes place after game number 15 and is a conference showdown. ü The total is 140 or more points. ü Our road team has forced 13 or fewer turnovers in each of their last five games. ü The host has forced 10 or fewer turnovers in each of their last three games. |
|||||||
02-13-24 | Iowa State +2 v. Cincinnati | Top | 68-59 | Win | 100 | 6 h 49 m | Show |
(10) Iowa State vs Cincinnati 7 ET | ESPN2 | Fifth Third Arena 8-Unit Bet on Iowa State plus 1.5 points and is valid to a -1.5-point favorite. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 42-74 SU record and 71-45 ATS record for 61% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: ü Bet on road dogs including pick-em. ü Our road team has committed 11 or fewer turnovers in each of their last four games. ü The host committed 8 or fewer turnovers in their previous game. ISU is 7-1 ATS after allowing 25 or fewer first half points in their previous game; 12-4 ARS after winning 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season. ISU head coach Otzelberger is 23-13 ATS after allowing 25 or fewer points in the first half of their previous game. Cincinnati head coach Miller is just 4-13 AZTS following a game in which his team got two or fewer steals. From the predictive model, we are looking for ISU to score 74 or more points and commit 12 or fewer turnovers. In this role they have earned a 26-4 SU mark and 22-8 ATS record good for 73% winning bets over the past five seasons. Cincinnati is 8-21 SU and 11-17-1 ATS (39%) when allowing 74 or more points and forcing 12 or fewer turnovers over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
02-12-24 | Texas A&M Corpus Christi v. Nicholls State +3.5 | Top | 63-67 | Win | 100 | 9 h 39 m | Show |
Texas A&M CC vs. Nicholls State 8-Unit Bet on Nicholls State +3.5 points and is valid if the remain the underdog. TAMCC is on a 7-game ats win streak and note that teams like them that are playing on the road and coming off a road loss have gone just 9-23 SUATS for 28% winning bets. From my predictive models we are looking for Nicholls State to score 72 or more points and shoot at least 45% from the field. In past games since 2019, Nicholls State is 60-7 SU and 19-10-1 ATS for 66% winning bets since 2019. The reason the SU record has far more games listed than the ATS record is that Nicholls State was not lined often in years past. |
|||||||
02-11-24 | Minnesota v. Iowa -6.5 | Top | 85-90 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 15 m | Show |
Minnesota vs Iowa 3 PM EST Consider betting 75% of your 8-Unit amount preflop on Iowa and then look to add 25% more at -3.5 points during the first half of action. Minnesota is 19-40-1 ATS as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9.5 points; 37-59 ASTS in road games after a combined score of 125 or fewer points in their previous game. Iowa head coach McCaffery is 23-10 ATS in home games after allowing 85 or more points in the last game; 28-10 ATS in home games and having lost the previous game by double-digits. From the predictive model we learn that Iowa is 56-7 SU and 44-14 ATS for 76% winning bets when scoring at least 78 points and getting at least 17 assists in games played over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
02-10-24 | St. John's v. Marquette -7.5 | Top | 75-86 | Win | 100 | 7 h 59 m | Show |
St. Johns vs Marquette For Live in-game netting strategies consider betting on Marquette preflop and then look to add 15% more at -4.5 points and 15% more at 2.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 162-122 ATS for 57% winning tickets sine 2015. The requirements are: Ø Bet on home favorites. Ø That favorite has scored 75 or more points in three consecutive games. Ø The dog is coming off a game in which they scored 85 or more points. From the predictive model we learn that Marquette is 91-3 SU and 62-30-2 ATS for 67.4% winning bets when scoring 80 or more points and getting at least 15 assists in home games. |
|||||||
02-10-24 | Tarleton State +8 v. Seattle University | Top | 82-77 | Win | 100 | 7 h 58 m | Show |
Tarleton State vs Seattle 6 ET | ESPN+ | Redhawk Center Consider betting 75% of your 8-Unit amount preflop and then look to add 25% more at 11.5 points during the first half of action. TS is just 7-1 ATS following a game that played Under. Seattle is 12-28 ATS after winning three of their last four games; 3-12 ATS after winning four of their last five games. Tarleton head coach Gillispie is 14-5 ATS in road games with a total between 130 and 139.5 points. From the predictive model we learn that Tarleton is a jaw-dropping 35-0 SU and 17-1-1 ATS for 94% winning bets when scoring 70 or more -points and holding their foes to less than 45% shooting. |
|||||||
02-10-24 | NC State v. Wake Forest -7.5 | Top | 79-83 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 59 m | Show |
NC State vs Wake Forest Lawrence Joel Veterans Memorial Coliseum 5-Unit Best Bet on Wake Forest -7.5 points and is valid to -8.5 points The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 162-122 ATS for 57% winning tickets sine 2015. The requirements are: Ø Bet on home favorites between 3.5 and 9.5 points. Ø That favorite is outscoring their opponents buy double-digits. Ø That favorite led by 20 or more points at the half of their last game. From the predictive model we learn that Wake Forest is 95-10 SU and 68-20-1 ATS for 77% winning bets when scoring 80 or more points in home games. Wake Forest is 61-4 SU and 43-8-1 ATS for 84% winning bets when scoring 80 or more points and having the same or fewer turnovers. For Live in-game netting strategies consider betting on Wake Forest preflop and then look to add 15% more at -4.5 points and 15% more at 2.5 points. |
|||||||
02-09-24 | San Jose State v. Colorado State -15.5 | Top | 47-66 | Win | 100 | 6 h 14 m | Show |
San Jose State vs Colorado State 9:30 PM EST 8-Unit bet on CSU -15.5 point and is valid to 16.5 points San Jose State is just 0-6 ATS when facing solid shooting teams making at least 45% of their shots after 15 or more games this season; 2-10 ATS when facing excellent ball handling teams committing 12 or fewer turnovers per game this season; 1-10 ATS in road games after two straight games making 53% of their free throws or worse. From my predictive models, CSU is expected to score 80 or more points (85% probability) and when they have in past games, they have earned a 30-10 ATS record good for 75% winning bets over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
02-08-24 | Texas-Arlington v. California Baptist -3 | Top | 63-64 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 20 m | Show |
Texas-Arlington vs Cal Baptist 10 ET 8-Unit Bet on Cal Baptist minus the 3.5 points and is valid to -5 points. Cal Baptists is 35-19 SU and 23-13 ATS for 63% winning bets following a game in which they shot 42% or worse form the field. From the predictive model, Cal Baptists is 14-2 SUATS when scoring 74 or more points and committing 12 or fewer turnovers over the past 5 seasons. |
|||||||
02-08-24 | Queens NC v. Lipscomb UNDER 168 | Top | 88-90 | Loss | -105 | 4 h 19 m | Show |
Queens NC vs Lipscomb 8 ET 8-Unit bet on the Under currently at 168 points and is valid to 165.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced an exception record going 21-5 UNDER for 71% winning bets. The requirements are: Ø Bet the Under in a game with a total of 165 points. Ø One of the teams (Lipscomb) has had 33 or fewer turnovers over their last four games. If that team is favored and the total is 160 or more points the Under has produced a 26-14 record for 65% winning bets. |
|||||||
02-07-24 | Bradley v. Evansville UNDER 144 | Top | 70-73 | Win | 100 | 4 h 45 m | Show |
Bradley vs Evansville 8-Unit bet Under the posted total of 143.5 points and is va.id to 141.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 90-55 Under record good for 62% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: Ø Bet the Under in games with a total between 143 and 151 points. Ø The home team has lost to the spread by 50 or more points spanning their last 10 games. Ø The road team, has seen the total play Over by 30 or more points spanning their previous five games. |
|||||||
02-07-24 | Georgia Southern v. South Alabama UNDER 152.5 | Top | 65-78 | Win | 100 | 4 h 43 m | Show |
Georgia Southern vs South Alabama 8 ET | ESPN+ | Mitchell Center, Mobile, AL 8-Unit Bet on the Under 151.5 points and is valid to 149.5 points. Here is a Free glance at type of unique and highly profitable research my subscribers get every day for every play I release. Check it out and then check the special discounted subscription I started offering today for the rest of the College Basketball season covering you through the NCAA Championship game. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 90-55 Under record good for 62% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: Ø Bet the Under in games with a total between 143 and 151 points. Ø The home team has lost to the spread by 50 or more points spanning their last 10 games. Ø The road team, has seen the total play Over by 30 or more points spanning their previous five games. If the game is taking place in the second half of the regular season, the Under has produced a 76-43 record good for 64% winning bets. From my predictive mode, we are looking to see South Alabama to shoot 45% or lower from the field and with both teams making fewer than 10 3-point shots. In lined games, the Under has gone 9-2 when South Alabama and GS has seen the Under go 9-0.when they have met or exceeded these performance measures.
|
|||||||
02-07-24 | Western Kentucky v. Louisiana Tech -9.5 | Top | 81-76 | Loss | -115 | 3 h 45 m | Show |
Western Kentucky vs Louisiana Tech 7 ET | ESPN+ | Thomas Assembly Center 8-Unit bet on Louisiana Tech minus the 9.5 points and is valid up to -10.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced an exception record going 218-72 SU 162-121-7 ATS for 57.2% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Ø Bet on home favorites of 3 to 10.5 points. Ø The home team is outscoring their opponents by 10 or more PPG. Ø The home led by 20 or more points at the half of their previous game. If our home favorite has posted an assist-to-turnover ratio of not more than 1.00 and the total is between 135 and 150 points they have earned an outstanding 43-18 SU record and 38-21 ATS for 64.4% winning tickets since 2015. From the predictive model we learn that WKY is 35-1 SU since 2006 and 10-3 ATS for 77% winning tickets since 2016 when scoring 77 or more points and with the opponent having committed three or more turnovers than they did. |
|||||||
02-07-24 | Loyola Maryland +9.5 v. American | Top | 44-43 | Win | 100 | 3 h 44 m | Show |
Loyola – Maryland vs American Bender Arena | 7 ET | ESPN+ 8-Unit bet on Loyola- Maryland +9.5 points and is valid to 8.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced an exceptional record going 340-230-5 ATS for 60% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Ø Bet on road teams that are priced at pick-em or as an underdog. Ø The road team is avenging a double-digit home loss. Ø The road team has lost 80% or more of their games on the season. American is just 9-18 ATS in each of the last two seasons after game number 15 and facing a foe that is forcing 14 or fewer turnovers per game. Loyola is 30-10 ATS for 75% in home games in which they seek to avenge a loss where they scored 60 or fewer points. Bet Loyola. |
|||||||
02-06-24 | Michigan State -3 v. Minnesota | Top | 56-59 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 45 m | Show |
Michigan State vs Minnesota Williams Arena | 9 ET | Peacock 8-Unit Bet on Michigan State -3.5 points and is valid to -4.5 points. Here are a few of the situational trends that are supporting this bet on MSU. MSU is 155-110 ATS after having won four of their last five games. Minnesota is 23-44 ATS after covering the the spread in four of their last five games. MSU is coming off a two-game home stand and under their head coach Tom Izzo they have gone 96-60 ATS when coming off a two home games in which they were priced as the favorite. From my predictive model, MSU is 19-6 SU and 16-5 ATS for 8-% when scoring 75 or more points and committing 12 or fewer turnovers when facing a conference foe under Tom Izzo. |
|||||||
02-06-24 | Ole Miss v. South Carolina -3 | Top | 65-68 | Push | 0 | 3 h 16 m | Show |
South Carolina vs Mississippi Colonial Life Arena, Columbia 8-Unit bet on South Carolina -3.5 points and is valid to -4.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has produced a 27-9 SU and 22-13-1 ATS record for 63% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Ø Bet on home favorites between 3 and 6.5 points. Ø The home team has covered the spread by a total of 48 or more points over their last 7 games. Ø The home te4am has won 75% or more of their games on the season. Ø The Total is between 130 and 145 points. |
|||||||
02-05-24 | Morgan State +8.5 v. North Carolina Central | Top | 79-72 | Win | 100 | 8 h 5 m | Show |
Morgan State vs NC Central McDougal-McLendon Arena, Durham | 7:30 ET 8-Unit bet on Morgan State +7.5 points and is valid to 6.5 points. The following NCAAB betting algorithm has gone 41-20-3 for 67% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are: Ø Bet on underdogs between 10 and 19.5 points. Ø The team is a terrible shooting from beyond the arc making 32% or fewer of those shots. Ø The foe allows 32% or lower 3-point shooting. Ø The game takes place after game number 15. Ø The team averages 14.5 to 17 turnovers per game. Ø The guest averages 14.5 or fewer turnovers per game. If the total is 220 or more points, the Under has gone an impressive 45-17-2 for 73% winning bets. |
|||||||
02-04-24 | Nebraska +10 v. Illinois | Top | 84-87 | Win | 100 | 6 h 41 m | Show |
Nebraska vs Illinois 8-Unit bet on Nebraska +9.5 points and is valid down to 7.5 points. Nebraska is a decent 3-popint shooting team and this is something Illinois does struggle defending as evidenced by the fact they are 3-11 ATS when facing a team that is making right or more 3-point shots per game after the 15th game of each of the past three seasons. Illinois is just 6-17 ATS when having lost to the spread in two fo their last three games over the past three seasons; 46-69 ATS following a game in which they committed eight or fewer turnovers. Illinois head coach is 9-19 ATS following a game in which they made 78% or more of their free throws. From the predictive model, Nebraska is 24-4 SU and 20-4-4 ATS for 83% winning bets when they have scored 77 or more points and had 12 or fewer turnovers since 2019. |
|||||||
02-03-24 | Xavier v. DePaul UNDER 150.5 | Top | 93-68 | Loss | -109 | 10 h 5 m | Show |
Xavier vs DePaul 8-Unit best bet on the UNDER 150.5 points and is valid down to 148.5 points. The following College Basketball betting algorithm has produced impressive results going 32-15-1 Under for 68% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: Ø Bet the Under in games with a total of 148 or more points. Ø The home team has lost to the spread by 50 or more points spanning their last 10 games. Ø The guest has seen their last 10 games play OVER by 30 or more points. For live betting considerations place 80% of your 8-unit betting amount on the Under preflop and then look to add 20% more on the Under at 157.5 points during the first half of action. Eastern Michigan vs. Northern Illinois 8-Unit best bet on NIU -6 points and is valid to -8 points.
The line for this game is likely to get cheaper for us, so give this one a bit of patience and monitor it ahead of the tip. The following College Basketball betting algorithm has produced impressive results going 32-15-1 Under for 68% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: Ø Bet the Under in games with a total of 148 or more points. Ø The home team is the underdog. Ø The home team has lost to the spread by 50 or more points spanning their last 10 games. Ø The guest has seen their last 10 games play OVER by 30 or more points. For live betting considerations place 80% of your 8-unit betting amount NIU preflop and then look to add 20% more on NIU at -1.5 points during the first half of action. |
|||||||
02-03-24 | Iowa State v. Baylor -3.5 | Top | 68-70 | Loss | -115 | 9 h 14 m | Show |
(12) Iowa State vs (18) Baylor Foster Pavilion, Waco, TX Betting on ranked teams that are ranked higher in numeric value in the AP poll (Baylor ranked 18th and Iowa State ranked 12th) and are at home facing a conference foe have gone 294-180 SU (62%) and 176-133-8 ATS (57%) since 2006. If the line is between 3.5 and 6.5 points these home ranked teams have gone 7-1 SUATS since 2018. In a ranked matchup of conference foes where the home team is favored between 1.5 and 10.5 points and the total is between 135 and 145 points, the home team has gone 60-17 SU and 47-27-3 ATS for 64% winning bets since 2006. If the home team has won 75% or more of their games on the season, they improve to 44-11 SU and 36-17-2 ATS for 68% winning bets since 2006. If we drill down a bit further into the matchup and include only games after the 15th one of the regular season, these homers have gone 32-5 SU and 24-11-2 ASTS for 69% winning bets. ISU is just 2-12 ATS in road games facing teams that attempt 21 or more 3-point shots per game on the season over the last two seasons. Baylor is 6-0 ATS when facing teams who are called for 3+ less fouls per game than their opponents over the last three seasons.
From the predictive model we expect Baylor to score 77 or more points and shoot 42% or higher form beyond the arc and have no more than 15 turnovers. In past home games when they met or exceeded these performance hurdles, they have gone on to a highly profitable 102-4 SU record and 53-7 ATS mark good for 88% winning bets since 2006. In games in which ISU allowed these measures has seen them go a terrible 12-56 SU and 5-31-1 ATS for 14% winning bets. |
|||||||
02-03-24 | Eastern Michigan v. Northern Illinois -6 | Top | 66-76 | Win | 100 | 5 h 34 m | Show |
Eastern Michigan vs. Northern Illinois 8-Unit best bet on NIU -6 points and is valid to -8 points.
The line for this game is likely to get cheaper for us, so give this one a bit of patience and monitor it ahead of the tip. NIU is 12-3 ATS when facing teams that average 6 or less steals per game on the season after 15 or more games in each of the past three seasons. EMU is a money-burning 0-8 ATS in road games after two or more consecutive UNDER results over the last three seasons. The following College Basketball betting algorithm has produced impressive results going 32-15-1 Under for 68% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: Ø Bet the Under in games with a total of 148 or more points. Ø The home team is the underdog. Ø The home team has lost to the spread by 50 or more points spanning their last 10 games. Ø The guest has seen their last 10 games play OVER by 30 or more points. For live betting considerations place 80% of your 8-unit betting amount NIU preflop and then look to add 20% more on NIU at -1.5 points during the first half of action. |
|||||||
02-03-24 | Morehead State v. Tennessee Tech +11 | Top | 67-60 | Win | 100 | 5 h 33 m | Show |
Morehead State vs Tennessee Tech 8-Unit best bet on Tennessee Tech plus 11 points and is valid of the remain a double-digit underdog. TTECH is not a good basketball team. However, there are solid teams ATS in specific situations. They are 9-1 ATS having lost eight or more of their last 10 games over the last three seasons; 6-0 ATS in home games avenging a loss to the current opponent by double-digits over the last two seasons. TTECH head coach Pelphrey is 28-12 ATS in home games when facing low pressure defensive teams that are forcing 14 or fewer turnovers per game after 15 games in all games he has coached. |
|||||||
02-03-24 | Robert Morris v. Detroit UNDER 144.5 | Top | 75-67 | Win | 100 | 2 h 36 m | Show |
Detroit Mercy vs Robert Morris 8-Unit best bet on the UNDER 144.5 points and is valid down to 143.5 points. The following College Basketball betting algorithm has produced impressive results going 39-23 Under for 63% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: Ø Bet the Under between 143 and 152 points. Ø The home team has lost to the spread by 50 or more points spanning their last 10 games. Ø The guest has seen their last 10 games play OVER by 30 or more points. If the home dog is priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points, the Under has gone 17-8 for 68% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. For live betting considerations place 80% of your 8-unit betting amount on the Under preflop and then look to add 20% more on the Under at 151.5 points during the first half of action. |
|||||||
02-01-24 | Morehead State v. Tennessee State +4.5 | Top | 68-49 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 15 m | Show |
Morehead State vs Tennessee State TS is a solid 11-2 ATS in home games revenging a road loss vs opponent over the last three seasons; 15-4 ATS in home games after a conference game over the last 3 seasons; 24-9 ATS off 3 straight wins against conference rivals. TS head coach Collis is a perfect in home games after scoring 65 points or less 2 straight games. From the predictive model TS is expected to score 70 or more points and for Morehead to have at least four ore turnovers than TS. In past games in which TS has met these projections has seen them go 25-8 ATS for 76% winning bets. |
|||||||
02-01-24 | Old Dominion +9.5 v. Marshall | Top | 83-76 | Win | 100 | 4 h 15 m | Show |
Old Dominion vs Marshall 7:00 EST | 8-Unit Bet on ODU plus the 9 points and is valid down to 7.5 points. Consider adding a sprinkle on the money line that is not more than 0.5 units. If you like the money line more than just a sprinkle then reduce the spread bet to 7 units and add 1.5 units on the money line to make the combination wager a little more aggressive. ODU is on an 11-3 ATS run when facing teams who are called for 17 or fewer fouls per game after 15+ games spanning the last two seasons. Marshall is 3-18 ATS after 2 straight games attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent in each game. From the predictive model, ODU is a perfect 7-0 ATS when scoring 71 or more points and committing 12 or fewer turnovers over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
01-31-24 | Vanderbilt v. Auburn UNDER 143 | Top | 54-81 | Win | 100 | 7 h 15 m | Show |
Vanderbilt vs Auburn Neville Arena, Auburn, AL 8-Unit bet Under the posted total of 142.5 points and is valid to 142.5 points. The following betting algorithm has produced a 62-34 Under record for 65% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: Ø Bet Under the total between 140 and 150. Ø The road team is coming off a double-digit loss. Ø The host is coming off a road upset loss. If our road team is the underdog, the Under improves to a 56-27 record for 68% winning bets over the past five seasons. Consider betting 70% preflop at 142.5 points and then at 15% more at 146.5 points and 15% more at 149.5 points during the first half of action. |
|||||||
01-31-24 | Wichita State v. Tulsa -115 | Top | 68-79 | Win | 100 | 5 h 16 m | Show |
Wichita State vs Tulsa 7 EST | Donald W. Reynolds Center, Tulsa, OK The following betting algorithm has produced a 50-21 SU record and a 38-21-5 ATS mark for 64% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: Ø Bet on any team that is outscoring their opponents by 3.5 to 8 points per game. Ø Game occurs after the 15th one of the season. Ø Our team is coming off five consecutive games in which they allowed 75 or more points in each one. Ø That team is facing a foe that has a scoring differential between -3.5 and +3.5 PPG. If our team has recorded an effective field goal percentage of 50% or better over their last five games, their record improves to 28-6 SU and 18-9-3 ATS for 67% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. |
|||||||
01-31-24 | Richmond v. Fordham +2 | Top | 83-69 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 14 m | Show |
Richmond at Fordham 8-Unit Bet on the Fordham Rams getting 2 points. If this line drops to 1.5 dog and at most 1.5-point favorite use the money line. So, this bet is valid to -1.5-point favorite. The following betting algorithm has produced a 42-19 SU record and a 43-17-1 ATS mark good for 71% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: Ø Bet on home teams priced between a 3-point favorite and a 3-point dog. Ø That home team has earned a win percentage between 40 and 50%. Ø That home team has played Under the total by 30 or more points over their last five games. |
|||||||
01-30-24 | Northern Illinois +3.5 v. Central Michigan | Top | 77-84 | Loss | -109 | 4 h 44 m | Show |
Northern Illinois vs Central Michigan If you like NIU to win this game outright then consider placing 6.5 units on the line and 1.5 units on the money line. The following Money Line College Basketball betting system has gone 99-115 for 46% winners, but by averaging a +158-money line wager has earned 45 units per unit wagered over the past 25 seasons. The requirements are: Ø Bet on any team that has allowed 47% or higher shooting in three consecutive games. Ø That team is facing a foe that has allowed 40% or lower shooting in each of their last three games. |
|||||||
01-29-24 | Boston University v. Holy Cross +3.5 | Top | 63-65 | Win | 100 | 4 h 15 m | Show |
Boston University vs Holy Cross 7 ET | Hart Center, Worcester, MA 8-Unit bet on Holy Cross +3.5 points and is valid if they remain the underdog. Let’s get right to the predictive model that projects Holy Cross will score 69 or more points and commit 12 or fewer turnovers. In past games over the past five seasons when Holy Cross has met or exceeded these performance measures in home games has led to a 4-4 SU record and a 6-1 ATS record good for 86% winning bets over the past two seasons. Boston University is 10-26 ATS for 28% when allowing 69 or more points and forcing 12 or fewer turnovers over the past five seasons. Holy Cross has not been lined to all games over the lifetime as a Division-1 Basketball program. |
|||||||
01-27-24 | Tulsa +3.5 v. Rice | Top | 85-83 | Win | 100 | 8 h 30 m | Show |
Tulsa vs Rice 8-Unit bet on Tulsa plus the 3 points and is valid if they remain the underdog. Consider betting 80% of your 8-unit bet preflop and then look to add the remaining 20% on Tulsa at +7.5 or better during the first half of action. Rice is 2-9 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record this season; 1-8 ATS when facing a foe that is outscoring their opponents by four or more PPG this season; 8-18-1 ATS when facing a conference foe spanning the last two seasons; 0-6 ATS following three consecutive games in which they committed no more than 14 turnovers in each of the three games. From the predictive models we learn that Tulsa is 15-6 SU and 12-6-1 ATS for 67% winning bets when scoring 74 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers in games played over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
01-27-24 | Kentucky v. Arkansas +7 | Top | 63-57 | Win | 100 | 7 h 31 m | Show |
Arkansas vs Kentucky 8-Unit bet on the Razorbacks plus 7.5 points and is valid to 6 points Consider betting 70% of your 8-unit bet preflop and then look to add the remaining 30% on the Razorbacks at +11.5 or better during the first half of action. Supporting this bet on the Razorbacks is the following algorithm that has gone 15-100 SU and 70-44-1 ATS for 61.4% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: · Bet on underdogs of 6 or more points. · Our dog is coming off a double-digit loss to a conference foe. · The opponent is coming off an road upset loss. If our dog is playing at home and their average points plus the foe’s average points per game is more than the posted total, our dog’s record improves to a highly profitable 5-18 SU and 17-6 ATS record for 74% winning bets over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
01-25-24 | Pacific +27.5 v. St. Mary's | Top | 28-76 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 48 m | Show |
Pacific vs St. Mary’s
Consider betting 80% of your 8-unit bet preflop and then look to add the remaining 20% on Pacific at +34.5 points during the first half of action. This is a monster dog and upon occasion the models do identify a great opportunity with these horrible playing teams going up against a top-level conference foe. Supporting this bet on Pacific is the following algorithm that has gone 11-113 SU, bnut a hioghly profitable 81-43 ATS for 65.3% winning bets since 1995. The requirements are: · Bet on double-digit underdogs. · The dog is coming off three consecutive losses to conference foes. · The favorite is coming off an upset win on the road. If the foe is not ranked in the latest Top-25 AP poll our dogs improve to a 64-36 ATS record for 64% winning bets since 1995. |
|||||||
01-25-24 | San Francisco v. Gonzaga -9 | Top | 72-77 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 43 m | Show |
San Francisco vs Gonzaga Consider betting 80% of your 8-unit bet preflop and then look to add the remaining 20% on two parts consisting of 10% on the Zags at -6.5 and 10% on the Zags at -3.5 points during the first half of action. Supporting this bet on the Zags is the following algorithm that has gone 70-20 SU and 52-36-2 ATS for 59% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: · Bet on home favorites between 3.5 and 9.5 points. · The favorite is outscoring their foes by an average 10 or more PPG. · The favorite is playing on four or more days of rest. · The favorite led by 20 or more points at the half of their previous game. If the game is after the 13th game of the regular season our favorites have gone an impressive 24-2 SU and 16-8-2 ATS for 67% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. |
|||||||
01-24-24 | Illinois v. Northwestern +3 | Top | 91-96 | Win | 100 | 5 h 52 m | Show |
Illinois vs Northwestern The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced a 158-91 ATS record for 64% winning bets over the past 27 seasons. The requirements are: · Bet on home teams from pick-em to any size underdog. · Game is after the 15th game of the season. · The home team allows an average of 67 to 74 PPG. · Facing a foe that is averaging 78 or more PPG. · That foe is coming off two straight Over results. Northwestern plays a bit slower style of game than Illinois and having the home court advantage will allow NWU to control the tempo of the game to their advantage. This is a critical game for Northwestern and with a win puts them into the coference champion conversation and off the NCAA bubble chat. |
|||||||
01-24-24 | Jacksonville State v. Middle Tennessee | Top | 67-75 | Win | 100 | 3 h 18 m | Show |
Jax State vs Middle Tennessee State MTST is 40-19 ATS in home games versus good shooting teams making at least 45% of their shots after the 15th game of the regular since 1997; 24-11 ATS when facing solid defensive teams allowing 64 or fewer points per game; 15-4 ATS in home games following a conference game spanning the past three seasons; 26-12 ATS when coming off two or more consecutive road losses. JAX State head coach Harper is just 4-13 ATS when the total has been fewer than 130 points. MTST head coach McDevitt is 12-3 ATS after the 15th game of the season playing at home and facing a foe that is shooting 45% or better from the field. |
|||||||
01-24-24 | Auburn +4 v. Alabama | Top | 75-79 | Push | 0 | 3 h 16 m | Show |
Auburn vs Alabama
The line and total for this game conveys an 83-79 Alabama win. My predictive models show an 84% probability that Auburn will score 78 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers in this game. In past games in which Auburn met or exceeded these performance measures in their road games has seen them go 22-3 SU and 19-4-1 ATS for 83% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. Alabama is 7-9 SU and 2-14 ATS for 13% winners in home games when they allowed 78 or more points and had the same or more turnovers in games played over the past 10 seasons. |
|||||||
01-23-24 | Evansville +13.5 v. Northern Iowa | Top | 63-70 | Win | 100 | 6 h 40 m | Show |
Evansville vs Northern Iowa The following college basketball betting algorithm has gone 27-46 SU, but a highly profitable 45-26-2 ATS for 63.4% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: · Betting on underdogs. · The Dog has failed to cover the spread by 42 or more points over their last five games. · The opponent has seen their last five games play Under by 55 or more points spanning their last five games. If the total in the game is posted at 140 or more points, these dogs improve to 20-23 SU and 29-13-1 ATS for 69% winning bets since 2015.
|
|||||||
01-23-24 | Toledo v. Northern Illinois +5.5 | Top | 89-73 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 39 m | Show |
Toledo vs Northern Illinois 8 EST Here are a few of the situational betting angles supporting NIU in this game. Toledo is 2-9 ATS when facing a team whose defense averages 14 or fewer turnovers per game. NIU is 37-16 AYTS when facing an elite ball handling team committing an average of 12 or fewer turnovers per game after the 15 game the regular season spanning the past 20 seasons. Toledo is 1-11 ATS after having won three of their last four games spanning the past two seasons; 26-13 ATS after two games facing conference foes spanning the past three seasons. NIU is 31-13 ATS following a game in which they scored 75+ points spanning the past 20 seasons. The current lines convey an 82-77 Toledo win and my predictive model project that NIU has an 85% probability of scoring 85 or more points. In past home games in which NIU scored 75 or more points has led them to a highly profitable 84-8 SU record and 41-14 ATS mark good for 75% winning bets over the past 20 seasons and 10-4 ASTS for 71.4% winning bets over the past three seasons. |
|||||||
01-23-24 | Wisconsin -3 v. Minnesota | Top | 61-59 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 39 m | Show |
Wisconsin vs Minnesota 7 EST Wisconsin is 16-5-1 ATS when facing teams averaging 16 or more assists per game in games played over the past three seasons; 8-1 ATS when facing teams that are outscoring their foes by 8+ PPG in games played this season; 14-4-1 ATS following a game in which both teasm scored 75 or more points over the past 15 seasons. From the predictive models, there is an 85% probability that Wisconsin will score 78 or more points and have 12 or fewer turnovers. In past games in which Wisconsin met or exceeded these performance measures they went on to an outstanding 28-1 SU and 20-6 ATS for 77% winning bets over the past five seasons. When Minnesota has allowed these measures they have gone on to a 2-21 SU record and 5-17-1 ATS mark for 22% winning bets over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
01-22-24 | Cincinnati v. Kansas -8 | Top | 69-74 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 44 m | Show |
Cincinnati vs Kansas Cincinnati is 9-19 ATS when facing an elite team shooting 45% or better and allowing 42% or lower in games played over the past three seasons. Kansas is 120-74 ATS when playing only their third game in a week; 70-40 ATS after allowing 80+ points in their previous game; 85-57 ATS following a loss. |
|||||||
01-22-24 | Nicholls State -2.5 v. Incarnate Word | Top | 78-74 | Win | 100 | 2 h 7 m | Show |
Nicholls State vs Incarnate Word Betting on road teams after game number 15 where the line is priced between the 3’s that are averaging 14 or fewer forced turnovers per game and facing a host that is averaging 14.5 to 18 turnovers per game and in matchup where both teams defenses are allowing 42.5 to 45% shooting has earned a 27-7-1 ATS record fot 79% winning bets over the past five seasons. |
|||||||
01-21-24 | Fairfield v. Manhattan UNDER 148.5 | Top | 82-75 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 44 m | Show |
Fairfield vs Manhattan
Consider betting 7 units Under preflop and then look to add 1-Unit at 155.5 points during the first half of action. Betting the Under in a game with a total between 143 and 152 and the home team has failed to cover the spread by 50 or more points over their previous 10 games and facing a foe that has seen the total play OVER by 35 or more points over their previous five games has earned a 56-28 Under record good for 67% winning bets since 2016. |
|||||||
01-20-24 | Northwestern v. Nebraska -2.5 | Top | 69-75 | Win | 100 | 2 h 20 m | Show |
Northwestern vs Nebraska Nebraska is 13-4 ATS in home games when facing a good ball handling teams committing 14 or fewer turnovers per game in games played over the past two seasons; 17-6 ATS in home games against conference opponents over the last 3 seasons; 8-1 ATS in home games off 2 straight losses against conference rivals over the last 3 seasons. Northwestern is an imperfect 0-7 ATS when allowing 75 or more points and the predictive models show an 82% probability that Nebraska will score at least 75 points today. |
|||||||
01-20-24 | Hampton +12.5 v. Monmouth | Top | 77-85 | Win | 100 | 2 h 4 m | Show |
Hampton vs Monmouth 8-Unit bet on Hampton +11.5 points and is valid to +10 points Betting on double-digit road underdogs that have forced 14 or fewer turnovers in five consecutive games and now facing a host that has played three consecutive games facing 11 or fewer turnovers has earned a 114-73-3 ATS record for 61% winning bets over the past 25 seasons. If the total is 145 or more points, these dogs have gone 34-17 ATS for 67% over the past 25 seasons. |
|||||||
01-17-24 | Texas-San Antonio v. Tulsa -6.5 | Top | 78-107 | Win | 100 | 5 h 37 m | Show |
TX-San Antonio vs Tulsa Tulsa is on a 56-31 ATS run when facing offensive-minded teams averaging 77 or more PPG. TXSA is just 4-13 ATS in road games after covering five or six of the past seven games. TXSA head coach Henson is just 13-24 ATS in road games when playing a winning record team after the 15th game of the season. From the predictive model, Tulsa is projected to score 80 or more points and commit no more than 12 turnovers. In past home games when Tulsa has met or e3xceeded these performance measures has led them to a 48-7 SU record and 28-6-3 ATS mark good for 82% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-17-24 | Mississippi State v. Kentucky UNDER 156 | Top | 77-90 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 36 m | Show |
Mississippi State vs Kentucky
10-UNIT Bet Under the posted total of 154 points and is valid to 151.5 points Consider betting 7 units Under preflop and then look to dd the remaining 3 units at 159.5 points during the first half of action. From the predictive models we are looking for MSST to commit no more than 18 turnovers, score 70 or fewer points and hold Kentucky to 38% or worse from beyond the arc. In past games when they have achieved these measures has seen the Under go 41-6 for 87% winning bets over the past five seasons. The Under has gone 33-9 for 79% winning bets when Kentucky has shot no better than 37% from beyond the arc, allowed 70 or fewer points and forced 18 or fewer turnovers spanning the last five seasons. |
|||||||
01-16-24 | Texas A&M v. Arkansas +3.5 | Top | 77-78 | Win | 100 | 6 h 33 m | Show |
Arkansas vs Texas A&M Betting on underdogs that have failed to cover the spread by 42 or more points spanning their last five games and now facing a foe that has gone Under the total by 55 or more points over their previous five games has earned a 26-26 SU record and 44-26-2 Ats mark for 63% winning bets since 2014 (10 seasons). If the total is between 140 and 149.5 points, these dogs have produced a 13-19 SU record and 21-10-1 ATS for 68% winning bets over the past 10 seasons and the Over in these games has been even better at 23-9 for 72% wining bets. The models did not identify a potential OVER bet for this matchup, but if you like it, I suggest betting it LIVE in-game at 137.5 or fewer points and make it no more than 3 units in size. I may put the OVER out on the web site as a free pick with the system featuring just the OVER and not giving away the side. |
|||||||
01-16-24 | Georgia +7.5 v. South Carolina | Top | 74-69 | Win | 100 | 6 h 32 m | Show |
Georgia vs South Carolina Georgia is 13-3 ATS when coming off a home ATS win where the team lost the game; 9-1 ATS after scoring 75 or more points in each of their last five games. Georgia head coach White is 25-10 ATS in road games and facing a host that is averaging six or fewer steals per game after game number 15 for his career. |
|||||||
01-16-24 | Richmond +4.5 v. Duquesne | Top | 63-61 | Win | 100 | 4 h 33 m | Show |
Richmond vs Duquesne Richmond is 9-2 ATS this season when facing a solid ball handling team that averages 14 or fewer turnovers per game. Duquesne is 1-8 ATS this season when playing a team with a winning record; 0-6 ATS this seasons when facing a team making 45% or more of their shots; 1-8 ATS when facing a strong defensive team allowing 42% or less shooting this season. |
|||||||
01-15-24 | Southern v. Bethune-Cookman +5 | Top | 81-83 | Win | 100 | 8 h 30 m | Show |
Southern University vs Bethune-Cookman Southern is 2-12 ATS in road games when facing teams making no better than 31% of their shots from beyond the arc in games played over the past three seasons; 1-9 ATS in road games after the 15th game of the season and facing a foe that has won 20 to 40% of their games, BC is 8-1 ATS in home games when facing a foe that averages three or more fouls per game than their opponents spanning the past three games.
|