|
03-12-26 |
Kurt Kitayama v. Harris English -110 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-110 |
45 h 35 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Harris English -110
Harris English brings a level of consistency to this matchup that Kurt Kitayama simply hasn't shown lately. English has been a machine at avoiding big numbers, ranking inside the top 20 in bogey avoidance over his last three tournaments.
Kitayama has the higher ceiling when his irons are hot, but he is too volatile for a pick-em price right now. His recent form shows a worrying trend with his putter, losing over a stroke to the field on the greens in back-to-back starts.
English excels in Strokes Gained: Total on courses that reward patience and scrambling. TPC Sawgrass is famous for penalizing aggressive mistakes, which plays right into the hands of a grinder like English.
He ranks significantly higher than Kitayama in scrambling percentage from the rough. When these guys miss the green, English is far more likely to save par and keep the scorecard clean.
Kitayama’s driving accuracy has also dipped over the last month. You cannot spray the ball off the tee at this venue and expect to win a head-to-head matchup.
English has finished inside the top 25 in four of his last five starts, showing he has the form to compete with the elite. Kitayama is coming off a missed cut where his approach play completely deserted him on the second day of play.
The statistics favor the more balanced game of English in this specific environment. He doesn't need to be perfect with his irons because his short game acts as a major safety net.
Kitayama is too reliant on elite ball-striking to stay competitive. If his irons are even slightly off, English will cruise to a victory in this pairing.
Bet Harris English ML (-110).
|
|
02-26-26 |
Nicolaj Hojgaard -115 v. Rasmus Hojgaard |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
42 h 40 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Nicolaj Hojgaard -115
Nicolaj Hojgaard is the play here because his ball-striking is currently on another level compared to his brother. He ranks significantly higher in Strokes Gained: Off-the-Tee and brings more raw power to navigate these long par 4s.
Distance is a massive advantage on this layout. Nicolaj is consistently carrying the ball further than Rasmus, which allows him to hit shorter irons into these firm, elevated greens.
His recent tournament form shows a much higher floor than what we are seeing from the other side of the family. While Rasmus has struggled with his consistency with the flat stick, Nicolaj has been a machine when it comes to hitting Greens in Regulation.
This course demands elite bogey avoidance. Nicolaj has been much better at scrambling and saving par when he misses the putting surface over his last several starts.
The stats for SG: Approach heavily favor Nicolaj over the last twelve rounds. He is stuffing his irons closer and giving himself more high-quality looks at birdie while Rasmus is grinding just to make par.
Rasmus has been fighting a minor miss with his driver that is putting him in difficult spots off the fairways. On a course with this much hazard depth, that lack of accuracy off the tee will be a major problem.
Nicolaj is simply the more complete player right now and getting him at this price is a steal. He has the physical tools to win this head-to-head matchup by several strokes.
I like the Nicolaj Hojgaard ML (-115)
|
|
02-26-26 |
Davis Thompson -145 v. Haotong Li |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-145 |
41 h 23 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Davis Thompson -145
Davis Thompson is the much better ball-striker in this matchup. He currently ranks inside the top 20 in Strokes Gained: Tee-to-Green this season.
Haotong Li is too inconsistent to back in a head-to-head format right now. His driving accuracy has been a major liability over his last three starts.
Thompson hits a high percentage of greens in regulation. He keeps the ball in play and avoids the big mistakes that plague Li’s game.
Li relies way too much on his short game to bail him out. You cannot win matchups by constantly scrambling from the thick stuff.
Thompson has been a model of consistency since the start of the 2026 season. He has made every cut and shows up with elite iron play every single week.
Li’s form has been trending the wrong direction. His Strokes Gained: Approach numbers are some of the worst in this week's field.
This course specifically rewards total driving and ball-striking. Thompson has a massive edge in both categories over a volatile player like Li.
Thompson’s bogey avoidance is also a key factor here. He stays out of trouble while Li tends to rack up doubles when his driver goes wayward.
The price on Thompson is surprisingly low given the statistical gap between these two. He is the more polished pro and has the higher floor.
I expect Thompson to pull away early by simply hitting more fairways and giving himself better looks at birdie.
Bet Davis Thompson ML (-145).
|
|
02-19-26 |
Corey Conners +105 v. Ryo Hisatsune |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
105 |
50 h 15 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Corey Conners +105
Corey Conners is the superior ball-striker in this matchup and the gap is wider than the odds suggest.
He consistently ranks near the top of the PGA Tour in Strokes Gained: Approach and Strokes Gained: Off-the-Tee.
His ability to flush irons and find greens in regulation keeps his floor much higher than a high-variance player like Ryo Hisatsune.
Conners is currently hitting over 70% of his greens in regulation over his last five tournaments.
That ball-striking dominance is the ultimate equalizer on a demanding track that requires precision over raw power.
Hisatsune is a talented young player, but he tends to struggle when he misses fairways and has to rely on scrambling to save par.
Conners rarely puts himself in those desperate situations because his tee-to-green game is so disciplined and dialed in.
The Canadian also brings far more experience to this specific course layout and knows exactly where the "safe" misses are.
Hisatsune can get hot with the putter, but putting is the most volatile stat in golf and rarely holds up over a full tournament against elite ball-striking.
I prefer banking on the golfer who is going to give himself 15 to 20 feet for birdie on almost every hole.
Getting an elite iron player like Conners at plus money in a head-to-head matchup is a massive overlay by the books.
The data shows Conners wins this matchup more than 55% of the time, making this +105 price a gift.
Conners has the edge in bogey avoidance and total driving, which are the two most important metrics for this week.
Bet Corey Conners ML (+105).
|
|
02-19-26 |
Akshay Bhatia +110 v. Pierceson Coody |
Top |
0-0 |
Push |
0 |
48 h 2 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Akshay Bhatia +110
Akshay Bhatia is the superior ball-striker in this matchup and getting him at plus money is a massive value play. We are looking at a clear edge in Strokes Gained: Approach which is the most vital metric for success this week.
Bhatia consistently ranks inside the top 30 on Tour in iron proximity while Pierceson Coody remains far more volatile. This course demands precision into small, firm greens that punish any misses from the fairway.
Bhatia has the elite ball-striking profile to keep himself out of trouble and rack up easy pars. Coody has plenty of power off the tee but often lacks the accuracy needed to navigate these tight landing areas.
If Coody is playing from the rough he will have no chance to control his spin into these elevated targets. Bhatia also holds a significant advantage in bogey avoidance over the last six months of tournament play.
He is a more polished tee-to-green player who does not need a hot putter to keep his card clean. Coody relies heavily on scrambling and making long putts which is a dangerous way to live at this venue.
We want the player who hits more greens in regulation and gives himself more looks at birdie. Bhatia’s game is built for this specific layout while Coody is still searching for consistency with his short irons.
The market is giving too much credit to Coody's raw power and not enough to Bhatia’s surgical approach game. I will take the more proven winner and the better overall golfer at a plus price every single time.
Bet Akshay Bhatia ML (+110).
|
|
02-19-26 |
Ryan Gerard v. Taylor Pendrith +110 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
47 h 17 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Taylor Pendrith +110
Taylor Pendrith is a steal at this plus-money price because the market is still stuck on Ryan Gerard’s hot start to the 2026 season.
While Gerard racked up three straight runner-up finishes in January, we finally saw his form dip last week at Pebble Beach where he struggled to a T45 finish.
Pendrith actually outplayed him in that event and now the tour moves to Riviera Country Club, which provides a massive environmental advantage for the Canadian.
Riviera is a legendary ball-striker's course that rewards elite distance off the tee and high, soft-landing approach shots.
Pendrith is one of the most consistent power hitters on the PGA Tour and his strokes gained off-the-tee numbers are built for a long track like this.
Gerard has been leaning heavily on a red-hot putter to mask some mediocre ball-striking stats over the last month.
Putting is the most volatile metric in golf and you cannot count on draining long-range bombs forever when you are missing fairways.
Gerard ranked near the bottom of the field in strokes gained around-the-green last week and lost over four shots to the field with his short game.
If he misses these small, firm greens at Riviera, he is going to be scrambling for his life just to save par.
Pendrith’s profile is much more sustainable for a four-day grind because he creates so many easy looks with his length.
He has the raw power to reach the par 5s in two and the ball flight needed to hold these difficult green complexes.
We are getting the better course fit and the player with the higher ceiling at an underdog price.
Bet Taylor Pendrith ML (+110).
|
|
02-18-26 |
Richard Sterne -140 v. Michael Hollick |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
36 h 4 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Richard Sterne -140
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
02-12-26 |
Akshay Bhatia +115 v. Ryan Gerard |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
115 |
46 h 2 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Akshay Bhatia +115
Akshay Bhatia is catching plus money in this matchup and that is a massive mistake by the books. He is currently one of the premier ball-strikers on the PGA Tour.
Bhatia consistently ranks near the top of every field in Strokes Gained: Approach and Tee-to-Green. His iron play gives him a major edge on a layout that rewards precision into these greens.
Ryan Gerard is a solid grinder, but he does not have the same scoring ceiling as Bhatia. Gerard relies far too much on his scrambling and short game to save his rounds when he misses.
Bhatia creates significantly more birdie opportunities by hitting a higher percentage of Greens in Regulation. When he gets even an average performance from his putter, he is a lock to outperform Gerard over four days.
The recent tournament form also points directly toward Bhatia's consistency in high-pressure spots. He has shown a much better ability to avoid the big numbers and bogeys that ruin a head-to-head matchup.
Bhatia’s driving distance allows him to carry hazards that Gerard often has to play around. This gives Bhatia shorter clubs and more aggressive angles into the pins throughout the round.
We are getting a superior ball-striker at an underdog price because of a few recent decent finishes from Gerard. Bhatia’s ability to find fairways and stick his approach shots inside twenty feet makes him the clear play here.
His ball-striking metrics are trending upward while Gerard is struggling to keep pace with the elite elite ball-strikers. Take the better overall player and the plus price while it is still on the board.
I like the Akshay Bhatia ML (+115)
|
|
02-12-26 |
Sam Burns v. Collin Morikawa +105 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
105 |
49 h 49 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Collin Morikawa +105
Getting Collin Morikawa at plus money in a head-to-head matchup is an auto-bet in this spot. He is the superior ball-striker and that is the specific skill set needed to win this matchup.
TPC Scottsdale rewards players who can consistently hit greens in regulation and give themselves looks. Morikawa is elite when it comes to Strokes Gained: Approach and ranks near the top of the Tour in iron proximity.
Sam Burns is a dangerous player when his putter is hot, but he is far more volatile. His game relies on high-variance putting and he often struggles if his ball-striking isn't perfectly on point.
Morikawa finds more fairways and eliminates the big numbers that can kill a matchup ticket. His precision off the tee and into the greens makes him the much more reliable option over four rounds.
Burns has more distance, but that advantage is negated by Morikawa’s ability to control his ball flight in the desert air. We are getting a world-class talent as an underdog despite him having the higher floor.
The recent form also favors Morikawa, who has been flushing his irons and showing improved consistency with his short game. Burns has been too erratic with his proximity to the hole lately to trust at this price.
Strokes Gained stats show a significant edge for Morikawa in the categories that actually hold up under pressure. I expect Morikawa to lean on his elite iron play to pull away as the tournament progresses.
Taking the better ball-striker at plus money is the sharp play every time. Burns is too dependent on the flat stick to be favored over a player of Morikawa's caliber here.
Bet Collin Morikawa ML (+105).
|
|
02-12-26 |
Aaron Rai -105 v. Max Greyserman |
Top |
0-1 |
Loss |
-105 |
49 h 40 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Aaron Rai -105
Aaron Rai is the more reliable ball-striker in this head-to-head matchup.
He consistently ranks near the top of the PGA Tour in driving accuracy and fairways hit.
Rai avoids the big mistakes that derail rounds by keeping the ball in play off the tee.
Max Greyserman has plenty of upside, but his game relies heavily on a hot putter.
Putting is the most volatile stat in golf and can disappear without warning from one round to the next.
Rai’s edge comes from his elite Strokes Gained: Approach numbers and iron consistency.
He gives himself more looks at birdie by hitting greens in regulation at a much higher clip.
Greyserman spends more time scrambling to save par, which puts a massive strain on his short game.
Rai is also one of the best on tour at bogey avoidance.
His disciplined course management keeps him in every hole and limits the damage on difficult stretches.
Greyserman has a higher ceiling when he is clicking, but his floor is much lower than Rai's.
In a matchup priced near a pick'em, the advantage goes to the golfer with the superior tee-to-green game.
Rai’s ball-striking is a measurable skill that travels well to any course.
I expect Rai to steady the ship while Greyserman battles more variance throughout the round.
Bet Aaron Rai ML (-105).
|
|
02-05-26 |
Kristoffer Reitan v. Jordan Smith +100 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
51 h 0 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Jordan Smith +100
Jordan Smith at even money is a gift in this matchup. Smith is one of the most consistent ball-strikers on any tour he plays.
He consistently ranks near the top in Strokes Gained: Off-the-Tee and SG: Approach. The guy hits fairways and finds greens in regulation at an elite clip.
Kristoffer Reitan does not have that same level of reliability from tee to green. Reitan is a streaky player who relies too much on a hot putter to save his scorecard.
In a head-to-head format, the better iron player almost always wins out over four days. Smith creates far more birdie opportunities and avoids the blow-up holes that often plague Reitan.
The course setup for this tournament rewards precision over raw distance. Smith’s ability to control his flight and distance with his mid-irons is the clear technical advantage here.
Reitan has struggled with his driving accuracy throughout the early part of the 2026 season. You cannot win matchups if you are constantly scrambling for par from the thick stuff.
Smith comes into this Thursday start with great momentum after a top-20 finish in his last outing. He is a high-floor player who rarely beats himself with mental errors or poor course management.
The market is treating this like a coin flip, but the ball-striking data says Smith should be the clear favorite. Take the more consistent performer who hits more greens and avoids the big numbers.
I like the Jordan Smith ML (+100)
|
|
02-05-26 |
Max Homa v. Tony Finau +110 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
47 h 15 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Tony Finau +110
Tony Finau is catching plus-money in this matchup and he is the superior ball-striker for this specific track.
TPC Scottsdale is a second-shot golf course where pure iron play wins out every time.
Finau is coming off a massive performance at the Farmers Insurance Open where he finished T11.
He even carded a hole-in-one during that event which shows his ball-striking is in mid-season form.
Max Homa is a dangerous player when his putter gets hot but he has been fighting his swing for over a year.
Homa has not won a tournament since early 2023 and recently split with his long-time swing coach.
While Homa is trying to find his rhythm with a new coach, Finau is playing with extreme confidence.
Finau currently ranks inside the top 15 in the world and has a stellar history at the Stadium Course.
He was a runner-up here in 2020 and consistently puts himself in the top ten because of his length off the tee.
Homa dealt with a lingering ankle bone spur late last season that hampered his ability to finish rounds.
Finau is healthy, focused, and historically gains more strokes on approach than Homa at this venue.
We are getting the more consistent player with better recent form at an underdog price.
That is a clear value play in a head-to-head matchup over four days.
Max will keep it close if he gets lucky with the flatstick but the tee-to-green gap favors Tony.
Bet Tony Finau ML (+110).
|
|
02-05-26 |
Joel Dahmen v. Brian Harman -115 |
Top |
1-0 |
Loss |
-115 |
47 h 4 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Brian Harman -115
Brian Harman is simply a different caliber of player than Joel Dahmen at this stage of their careers. Harman is coming off a strong 2025 campaign that included a victory at the Valero Texas Open.
Meanwhile, Joel Dahmen is currently fighting to keep his career on track. He lost his full PGA Tour card for the 2026 season and is playing this week purely on conditional status.
The gap in current form is impossible to ignore. Harman remains one of the most consistent grinders on tour, ranking near the top in Bogey Avoidance and Scrambling.
Dahmen has been a mess with his ball-striking for months. He recently made the desperate move of parting ways with his long-time caddie after his game completely fell apart.
TPC Scottsdale is a course that demands precision and clean scorecards. Harman’s accuracy off the tee and world-class putting are the perfect fit for this desert layout.
Dahmen has become too prone to the big number. He famously imploded late last year at the Corales Puntacana Championship, losing a three-shot lead with a flurry of late bogeys.
Harman is a major champion who stays composed when the pressure is on. He isn't going to give away strokes with the kind of loose play we’ve seen from Dahmen recently.
Dahmen might be a fan favorite at the rowdy 16th hole, but his actual stats are ugly. He has been losing significant strokes to the field in iron play over his last ten tournaments.
I am laying the short price on the golfer who actually wins tournaments. Harman has a much higher floor and a significantly higher ceiling in this head-to-head matchup.
Expect Harman to play his usual brand of mistake-free golf while Dahmen continues to struggle with his consistency. This is a classic spot to fade a popular player in a deep slump.
Bet Brian Harman ML (-115).
|
|
01-29-26 |
Mackenzie Hughes +100 v. Sami Valimaki |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
43 h 50 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Mackenzie Hughes +100
Mackenzie Hughes is the much more reliable option in this head-to-head matchup. He brings a world-class short game that allows him to grind out scores on tough tracks.
Hughes consistently ranks as one of the best putters on the PGA Tour. His ability to save par from the thick rough gives him a high floor that Valimaki lacks.
Sami Valimaki has plenty of raw power but is far too volatile for this price. He tends to spray the ball off the tee, and this course penalizes errant drives heavily.
Valimaki struggles with bogey avoidance when he isn't hitting fairways. Hughes is a grinder who stays patient and lets his opponents make the mistakes.
The Canadian has a proven track record during the West Coast swing. He thrives on these specific green complexes where local knowledge and touch matter most.
Valimaki is still searching for consistency in these high-pressure tournament rounds. The statistical edge in Strokes Gained: Around the Green is heavily in favor of Hughes.
Even money is a gift for the more polished and experienced player. I expect Hughes to play a clean round while Valimaki finds too much trouble.
I like the Mackenzie Hughes ML (+100)
|
|
01-29-26 |
Jake Knapp v. Wyndham Clark -105 |
|
66-70 |
Loss |
-105 |
41 h 49 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Wyndham Clark -105
Wyndham Clark is sitting at a bargain price in this opening-round matchup. Getting a major champion at nearly even money against a less experienced opponent is a clear edge.
This tournament is being played at Torrey Pines, which is one of the most demanding tests on the PGA Tour. The South Course rewards pure power and elite long-iron play.
Clark excels in these specific conditions. His strokes gained off-the-tee numbers remain near the top of the category, which is vital for navigating these long par 4s.
Jake Knapp has plenty of distance, but his consistency isn't on the same level as Clark's. Knapp tends to struggle when his driving accuracy dips on these narrow, penal fairways.
Clark also holds a significant advantage in strokes gained approach. He is far more precise with his proximity to the hole from 175 yards and out.
That specific yardage is where this match will be won or lost. Most of the second shots this week will come from that deep range into firm greens.
Clark is also a world-class scrambler when he does happen to miss a green. He has the strength to gouge the ball out of the thick coastal rough and save par.
Knapp’s short game can be a liability when the pressure ramps up. He doesn't have the same level of touch around the greens when the conditions get difficult.
Clark has much more experience in these marquee pairings. He won't be rattled by a slow start or a couple of early bogeys on a tough layout.
The market is giving way too much credit to Knapp’s recent flashes of brilliance. Clark is the more polished professional with both a higher floor and a higher ceiling.
Take the proven winner over the high-variance youngster. Clark’s ball-striking and major-winning pedigree will be the difference-maker in this spot.
I like the Wyndham Clark ML (-105).
|
|
01-22-26 |
Jason Day +115 v. Rico Hoey |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
115 |
46 h 22 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Jason Day +115
Jason Day is a massive steal at plus-money in this matchup. The oddsmakers are giving way too much credit to Rico Hoey's raw power off the tee.
This week at the American Express, success is all about the flat stick and avoiding big numbers. Day remains one of the most elite scramblers and putters on the PGA Tour.
The veteran ranks significantly higher than Hoey in Strokes Gained: Putting and Bogey Avoidance. In a tournament where the winning score is usually 20-under or better, you need a guy who can get hot on the greens.
Day’s short game is his equalizer. He can save par from anywhere, which keeps his momentum alive during a long four-day grind.
Rico Hoey is a high-ceiling talent, but his floor is much lower than Day’s. Hoey tends to struggle with his iron play and distance control on these desert courses.
The data shows Hoey is prone to "blow-up" holes that can ruin a matchup card in one or two swings. Day has the experience to navigate the unique pro-am format and the three-course rotation used this week.
Day’s recent form shows his ball-striking is back to a level that complements his world-class chipping. He is hitting more fairways and giving himself more looks at birdie than he did at this time last year.
Hoey is still learning how to manage his aggression on tracks that reward patience. Day will sit back, make his putts, and let the younger player make the mistakes.
Getting a former world number one as an underdog in a head-to-head against an unproven winner is an easy call. The value is clearly on the veteran at +115 to stay more consistent over the first two rounds.
I like the Jason Day ML (+115)
|
|
01-21-26 |
Rory McIlroy v. Tommy Fleetwood +145 |
Top |
73-73 |
Push |
0 |
32 h 44 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Tommy Fleetwood +145
Rory McIlroy is the biggest name in the field but he is the wrong favorite in this matchup. Tommy Fleetwood is a desert specialist who has dominated these specific conditions for years.
The oddsmakers are pricing Rory based on his star power rather than the current numbers. Fleetwood enters this week with a massive edge in driving accuracy and greens in regulation.
Rory has the advantage in raw distance but that won't help him much on this layout. The fairways are narrower than last year and the rough is much more punishing for anyone missing the short grass.
Fleetwood currently ranks in the top five for strokes gained approach over his last three tournaments. He is hitting his irons pure and giving himself birdie looks on nearly every hole.
McIlroy is making his first competitive start of the season and usually needs a few rounds to shake off the rust. His wedge play and scrambling often lag behind during his first week back on the course.
Tommy is already in a great rhythm and showed last week that his putter is finally heating up. He avoids the big mistakes and double-bogeys that can sink a head-to-head matchup.
You don't often get this kind of value on a course specialist who has multiple wins at this venue. Fleetwood is the more reliable ball-striker right now and should be the one favored in this spot.
I like the Tommy Fleetwood ML (+145).
|
|
01-15-26 |
J.J. Spaun v. Collin Morikawa +107 |
Top |
66-72 |
Loss |
-100 |
45 h 56 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Collin Morikawa +107
Getting Collin Morikawa at plus money in a head-to-head matchup is a gift you don't pass up. The market is giving J.J. Spaun too much credit for recent consistency while overlooking Morikawa’s elite ball-striking ceiling. Morikawa remains one of the premier iron players on the planet. He consistently ranks in the top five on Tour in Strokes Gained: Approach and proximity to the hole. This course rewards precision off the tee and sharp proximity numbers. Morikawa excels at hitting fairways and giving himself looks from the short grass. J.J. Spaun is a solid grinder, but he doesn't have the statistical profile to match Morikawa over four rounds. Spaun struggles to keep pace when the winning score pushes toward twenty-under par. Morikawa’s ability to gain strokes from tee-to-green is much more sustainable than Spaun’s reliance on a hot putter. If Morikawa has even a neutral week on the greens, he wins this matchup comfortably. We are looking at a two-time Major winner against a mid-tier veteran. The gap in talent and Greens in Regulation (GIR) percentage is wider than this line suggests. Morikawa came out of the gate strong last week and his swing looks completely synced up. He is hitting his lines and controlling his flight in the wind better than almost anyone in the field. Expect Morikawa to suffocate Spaun with better ball-striking and fewer mistakes. Taking the superior talent at an underdog price is the sharp play every single time. I like the Collin Morikawa ML (+107)
|
|
11-13-25 |
Seamus Power v. Doug Ghim +100 |
Top |
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
48 h 7 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Doug Ghim +100
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
11-13-25 |
Chad Ramey v. Vincent Whaley -110 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
47 h 27 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Vincent Whaley -110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
11-13-25 |
Rico Hoey v. Min-Kyu Kim +110 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
43 h 47 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Min-Kyu Kim +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
11-06-25 |
Michael Brennan v. Pierceson Coody +100 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
45 h 38 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Pierceson Coody +100
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
11-06-25 |
Sam Ryder v. Patrick Rodgers +105 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
105 |
40 h 26 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Patrick Rodgers +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-23-25 |
Noah Goodwin -120 v. Harry Higgs |
Top |
0-1 |
Loss |
-120 |
48 h 0 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Noah Goodwin -120
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-23-25 |
David Skinns v. David Lipsky -105 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
48 h 37 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on David Lipsky -105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-23-25 |
Greyson Sigg -110 v. Hayden Springer |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
46 h 18 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Greyson Sigg -110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-09-25 |
Daniel Brown -105 v. Thomas Detry |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
34 h 22 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Daniel Brown -105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-08-25 |
William Mouw v. Billy Horschel -115 |
|
68-77 |
Loss |
-115 |
25 h 23 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Billy Horschel -115
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-08-25 |
Max Homa v. Sungjae Im -115 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
25 h 23 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Sungjae Im -115
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-08-25 |
Max Greyserman +100 v. Ryo Hisatsune |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
26 h 29 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Max Greyserman +100
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-02-25 |
Stephan Jaeger +120 v. Alex Smalley |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
120 |
48 h 12 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Stephan Jaeger +120
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-02-25 |
Steven Fisk -110 v. Taylor Montgomery |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
45 h 6 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Steven Fisk -110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
10-02-25 |
Greyson Sigg +105 v. Harry Higgs |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
105 |
44 h 49 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Greyson Sigg +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
09-11-25 |
Patrick Cantlay -110 v. Cameron Young |
Top |
0-1 |
Loss |
-110 |
49 h 17 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Patrick Cantlay -110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
09-11-25 |
Harris English v. Akshay Bhatia +100 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
42 h 7 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Akshay Bhatia +100
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
09-11-25 |
Nick Echavarria v. Mackenzie Hughes -110 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
44 h 50 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Mackenzie Hughes -110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
08-21-25 |
Justin Thomas v. Sam Burns +105 |
Top |
0-0 |
Push |
0 |
48 h 39 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Sam Burns +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
08-15-25 |
Adrian Meronk v. Peter Uihlein -110 |
Top |
1-0 |
Loss |
-110 |
70 h 44 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Peter Uihlein -110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
08-15-25 |
Matthew Jones -102 v. Ben Campbell |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-102 |
65 h 1 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Matthew Jones -102
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
08-14-25 |
J.J. Spaun v. Ben Griffin +100 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
47 h 16 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Ben Griffin +100
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
08-07-25 |
Ryan Gerard v. Si Woo Kim -125 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
48 h 58 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Si Woo Kim -125
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
08-07-25 |
Sungjae Im -110 v. Jake Knapp |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
46 h 38 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Sungjae Im -110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
08-07-25 |
Davis Riley +120 v. Ben Campbell |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
120 |
44 h 5 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Davis Riley +120
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-31-25 |
Max Homa v. Jackson Koivun -130 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
36 h 35 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Jackson Koivun -130
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-25-25 |
Bubba Watson +110 v. Charl Schwartzel |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
110 |
63 h 12 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Bubba Watson +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-24-25 |
Christopher Gotterup -115 v. Wyndham Clark |
|
63-67 |
Win
|
100 |
50 h 52 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Christopher Gotterup -115
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-24-25 |
Max McGreevy +105 v. Tom Kim |
Top |
0-1 |
Loss |
-100 |
46 h 35 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Max McGreevy +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-17-25 |
Viktor Hovland v. Robert Macintyre +110 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
110 |
46 h 20 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Robert Macintyre +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-17-25 |
Matthew Fitzpatrick -125 v. Sepp Straka |
|
67-72 |
Win
|
100 |
40 h 27 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Matthew Fitzpatrick -125
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-17-25 |
Min-Kyu Kim v. Sungjae Im +110 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
110 |
40 h 35 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Sungjae Im +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-17-25 |
Lucas Herbert -130 v. Marc Leishman |
Top |
0-1 |
Loss |
-130 |
37 h 49 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Lucas Herbert -130
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-10-25 |
Harris English +105 v. J.J. Spaun |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
105 |
44 h 2 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Harris English +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-10-25 |
Matthew Fitzpatrick -125 v. Sepp Straka |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
39 h 9 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Matthew Fitzpatrick -125
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-10-25 |
Maverick McNealy v. Si Woo Kim +105 |
Top |
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
39 h 2 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Si Woo Kim +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-03-25 |
Andrew Putnam -105 v. Kevin Roy |
Top |
0-1 |
Loss |
-105 |
34 h 46 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Andrew Putnam -105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-03-25 |
Mark Hubbard -115 v. Keith Mitchell |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
32 h 24 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Mark Hubbard -115
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
07-03-25 |
Tom Kim +110 v. Ryo Hisatsune |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-100 |
32 h 57 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Tom Kim +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-26-25 |
Si Woo Kim v. Harry Hall +110 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
110 |
49 h 12 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Harry Hall +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-26-25 |
Davis Thompson v. Akshay Bhatia +120 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
120 |
45 h 38 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Akshay Bhatia +120
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-26-25 |
Ryan Gerard v. Alexander Noren +105 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
43 h 34 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Alexander Noren +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-19-25 |
Shane Lowry v. Hideki Matsuyama +109 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
109 |
50 h 53 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Hideki Matsuyama +109
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-12-25 |
Sepp Straka +105 v. Viktor Hovland |
Top |
78-71 |
Loss |
-100 |
49 h 57 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Sepp Straka +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-05-25 |
Jesper Svensson v. Victor Perez +115 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
115 |
45 h 45 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Victor Perez +115
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-05-25 |
Keith Mitchell +105 v. Mackenzie Hughes |
|
68-68 |
Push |
0 |
35 h 37 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Keith Mitchell +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
06-05-25 |
Erik Van Rooyen -105 v. Nicolaj Hojgaard |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
42 h 23 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Erik Van Rooyen -105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-29-25 |
Matthias Schmid v. Jhonattan Vegas +115 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
115 |
47 h 14 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Jhonattan Vegas +115
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-29-25 |
Christiaan Bezuidenhout v. Mackenzie Hughes +120 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
120 |
46 h 25 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Mackenzie Hughes +120
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-29-25 |
Adam Hadwin v. Ben Campbell -105 |
Top |
1-0 |
Loss |
-105 |
45 h 60 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Ben Campbell -105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-22-25 |
Martin Couvra v. Brandon Stone +105 |
Top |
0-0 |
Push |
0 |
37 h 51 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Brandon Stone +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-15-25 |
Justin Thomas v. Xander Schauffele -105 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
40 h 25 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Xander Schauffele -105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-15-25 |
Matthew Fitzpatrick +120 v. J.J. Spaun |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
120 |
45 h 59 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Matthew Fitzpatrick +120
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-08-25 |
Andrew Novak v. Brian Harman +105 |
Top |
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
48 h 44 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Brian Harman +105
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-01-25 |
Matt McCarty -135 v. Karl Vilips |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
44 h 38 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Matt McCarty -135
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-01-25 |
Matt Kuchar +110 v. Kurt Kitayama |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-100 |
43 h 21 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Matt Kuchar +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
05-01-25 |
Doug Ghim -135 v. Charley Hoffman |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
42 h 4 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Doug Ghim -135
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-25-25 |
Matthew Wolff v. Henrik Stenson +110 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
110 |
72 h 44 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Henrik Stenson +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-23-25 |
Andrea Pavan v. Kiradech Aphibarnrat +115 |
Top |
0-1 |
Win
|
115 |
29 h 3 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Kiradech Aphibarnrat +115
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-17-25 |
Ludvig Aberg v. Xander Schauffele +100 |
|
69-69 |
Push |
0 |
48 h 49 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Xander Schauffele +100
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-17-25 |
JT Poston v. Brian Harman +110 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
110 |
46 h 29 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Brian Harman +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-17-25 |
Corey Conners -130 v. Shane Lowry |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-130 |
45 h 39 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Corey Conners -130
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-17-25 |
Eric Cole v. Cameron Young +127 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
44 h 54 m |
Show
|
4* VEGAS INSIDER on Cameron Young +127
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-17-25 |
Adam Hadwin +135 v. Ben Campbell |
Top |
0-1 |
Loss |
-100 |
45 h 45 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Adam Hadwin +135
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-16-25 |
Rasmus Neergaard Petersen v. Keita Nakajima +110 |
Top |
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
25 h 39 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Keita Nakajima +110
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-16-25 |
Eugenio Lopez Chacarra v. Jorge Campillo +135 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
24 h 29 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Jorge Campillo +135
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-16-25 |
Matthew Jordan v. Jordan Smith +100 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
24 h 17 m |
Show
|
3* HEAVY HITTER on Jordan Smith +100
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-12-25 |
Hideki Matsuyama -115 v. Ludvig Aberg |
Top |
79-69 |
Loss |
-115 |
6 h 7 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Hideki Matsuyama All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-10-25 |
Ben Campbell v. Thriston Lawrence +105 |
|
1-0 |
Loss |
-100 |
45 h 49 m |
Show
|
4* MAJOR on Thriston Lawrence
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-10-25 |
Viktor Hovland +105 v. Jordan Spieth |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-100 |
39 h 55 m |
Show
|
3* BEST BET on Viktor Hovland
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-10-25 |
Ludvig Aberg +110 v. Justin Thomas |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
110 |
47 h 55 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Ludvig Aberg
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-10-25 |
Laurie Canter -105 v. Max Greyserman |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-105 |
41 h 24 m |
Show
|
4* MAJOR on Laurie Canter
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-10-25 |
Bubba Watson +120 v. Zach Johnson |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-100 |
42 h 52 m |
Show
|
3* BEST BET on Bubba Watson
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-03-25 |
Kurt Kitayama -110 v. Lee Hodges |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-110 |
49 h 46 m |
Show
|
3* BEST BET on Kurt Kitayama
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-03-25 |
Michael Thorbjornsen -145 v. Aldrich Potgieter |
|
0-1 |
Loss |
-145 |
48 h 52 m |
Show
|
4* MAJOR on Michael Thorbjornsen
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-03-25 |
Gary Woodland +110 v. Matthew Fitzpatrick |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
110 |
47 h 8 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Gary Woodland
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
04-03-25 |
Sami Valimaki v. Ryo Hisatsune -135 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
43 h 26 m |
Show
|
3* BEST BET on Ryo Hisatsune
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
03-27-25 |
Thomas Detry -110 v. Alex Smalley |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
53 h 31 m |
Show
|
3* BEST BET on Thomas Detry
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
03-27-25 |
Tony Finau +100 v. Si Woo Kim |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
53 h 26 m |
Show
|
4* MAJOR on Tony Finau
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
03-27-25 |
Mac Meissner -110 v. Justin Lower |
Top |
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
48 h 54 m |
Show
|
5* NO BRAINER on Mac Meissner
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
03-27-25 |
Adam Hadwin +100 v. Charley Hoffman |
|
1-0 |
Win
|
100 |
45 h 8 m |
Show
|
3* BEST BET on Adam Hadwin
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|
|
03-20-25 |
Charley Hoffman v. Andrew Putnam -135 |
|
0-1 |
Win
|
100 |
42 h 36 m |
Show
|
4* MAJOR on Andrew Putnam
All plays are made using sophisticated machine learning models.
|